Termination Due to Adverse Environmental Impact Sample Clauses

Termination Due to Adverse Environmental Impact. This Award Agreement will terminate at the conclusion of the environmental review process if SUBRECIPIENT or the City determines that the project would have a significant adverse impact on the quality of the human environment and that this impact cannot be avoided or sufficiently mitigated by reasonable, cost-effective means.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (30)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Termination Due to Adverse Environmental Impact. This Agreement is conditioned on the City’s determination to proceed with, modify or cancel the project based on the results of a subsequent environmental review. This Agreement will terminate at the conclusion of the environmental review process if the results of the review indicate that the project would have a significant adverse impact on the environment and that this impact cannot be feasibly eliminated or mitigated.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (14)
Termination Due to Adverse Environmental Impact. This Agreement will terminate if the Grantee or the City determines that the project would have an adverse impact on the quality of the human environment and that this impact cannot be avoided or sufficiently mitigated by reasonable, cost-effective means.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Termination Due to Adverse Environmental Impact. This Contract will terminate at the conclusion of the environmental review process if the Grantee or the Department determines that the project would have a significant adverse impact on the quality of the human environment, and that this impact cannot be avoided or sufficiently mitigated by reasonable means.
Sample 1Sample 2
Termination Due to Adverse Environmental Impact. This Loan Agreement will terminate at the conclusion of the environmental review process if AWARDEE or the City determines that the project would have a significant adverse impact on the quality of the human environment and that this impact cannot be avoided or sufficiently mitigated by reasonable, cost-effective means.
Sample 1
Termination Due to Adverse Environmental Impact. This MOA will terminate at the conclusion of the environmental review process if the Grantee or the OPG determines that the project would have a significant adverse impact on the quality of the human environment and that this impact cannot be avoided or sufficiently mitigated by reasonable, cost-effective means.
Sample 1

Related to Termination Due to Adverse Environmental Impact

  • ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS No implications identified.

  • Responsibility for Environmental Contamination 5.20.1 Neither Party shall be liable to the other for any costs whatsoever resulting from the presence or release of any Environmental Hazard that either Party did not introduce to the affected Work Location. Both Parties shall defend and hold harmless the other, its officers, directors and employees from and against any losses, damages, claims, demands, suits, liabilities, fines, penalties and expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees) that arise out of or result from (i) any Environmental Hazard that the Indemnifying Party, its contractors or agents introduce to the Work Locations or (ii) the presence or release of any Environmental Hazard for which the Indemnifying Party is responsible under Applicable Law.

  • Environmental Condition Except as set forth on Schedule 5.12 to the Information Certificate, (a) to each Loan Party’s knowledge, no properties or assets of any Loan Party or any of its Subsidiaries have ever been used by a Loan Party, its Subsidiaries, or by previous owners or operators in the disposal of, or to produce, store, handle, treat, release, or transport, any Hazardous Materials, where such disposal, production, storage, handling, treatment, release or transport was in violation, in any material respect, of any applicable Environmental Law, (b) to each Loan Party’s knowledge, after due inquiry, no Loan Party’s nor any of its Subsidiaries’ properties or assets have ever been designated or identified in any manner pursuant to any environmental protection statute as a Hazardous Materials disposal site, (c) no Loan Party nor any of its Subsidiaries has received notice that a Lien arising under any Environmental Law has attached to any revenues or to any Real Property owned or operated by a Loan Party or its Subsidiaries, and (d) no Loan Party nor any of its Subsidiaries nor any of their respective facilities or operations is subject to any outstanding written order, consent decree, or settlement agreement with any Person relating to any Environmental Law or Environmental Liability that, individually or in the aggregate, could reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Change.

  • Environmental Contamination Neither Party shall in any event be liable to the other Party for any costs whatsoever resulting from the presence or release of any environmental hazard such Party did not cause or contribute to causing. Each Party shall, at the other Party's request, indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the other Party, each of its officers, directors and employees from and against any losses, damages, claims, demands, suits, liabilities, fines, penalties and expenses (including reasonable attorneys fees) that arise out of or from (i) any environmental hazard that such Party, its contractors or agents caused in the work locations or (ii) the presence or release of any environmental hazard for which such Party is responsible under Applicable Law. In the event both Parties contribute to such environmental hazard, they shall each proportionately bear such liability.

  • Environmental Conditions A Phase I environmental site assessment (or update of a previous Phase I and or Phase II environmental site assessment) and, with respect to certain Mortgage Loans, a Phase II environmental site assessment (collectively, an “ESA”) meeting ASTM requirements conducted by a reputable environmental consultant in connection with such Mortgage Loan within 12 months prior to its origination date (or an update of a previous ESA was prepared), and such ESA (i) did not identify the existence of Recognized Environmental Conditions (as such term is defined in ASTM E1527-05 or its successor, hereinafter “Environmental Condition”) at the related Mortgaged Property or the need for further investigation, or (ii) if the existence of an Environmental Condition or need for further investigation was indicated in any such ESA, then at least one of the following statements is true: (A) an amount reasonably estimated by a reputable environmental consultant to be sufficient to cover the estimated cost to cure any material noncompliance with applicable Environmental Laws or the Environmental Condition has been escrowed by the related Mortgagor and is held or controlled by the related lender; (B) if the only Environmental Condition relates to the presence of asbestos-containing materials, radon in indoor air, lead based paint or lead in drinking water, the only recommended action in the ESA is the institution of such a plan, an operations or maintenance plan has been required to be instituted by the related Mortgagor that can reasonably be expected to mitigate the identified risk; (C) the Environmental Condition identified in the related environmental report was remediated, abated or contained in all material respects prior to the date hereof, and, if and as appropriate, a no further action, completion or closure letter or its equivalent, was obtained from the applicable governmental regulatory authority (or the Environmental Condition affecting the related Mortgaged Property was otherwise listed by such governmental authority as “closed” or a reputable environmental consultant has concluded that no further action or investigation is required); (D) an environmental policy or a lender’s pollution legal liability insurance policy that covers liability for the Environmental Condition was obtained from an insurer rated no less than “A-” (or the equivalent) by Xxxxx’x, S&P and/or Fitch; (E) a party not related to the Mortgagor was identified as the responsible party for the Environmental Condition and such responsible party has financial resources reasonably estimated to be adequate to address the situation; or (F) a party related to the Mortgagor having financial resources reasonably estimated to be adequate to address the situation is required to take action. To Seller’s knowledge, except as set forth in the ESA, there is no Environmental Condition at the related Mortgaged Property.

  • NON-SEXIST ENVIRONMENT 1. A non-sexist environment is defined as that in which there is no discrimination against females or males by portraying them in gender stereotyped roles or by omitting their contributions.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.