Staff Mobility Dispute Resolution Mechanism Sample Clauses

Staff Mobility Dispute Resolution Mechanism. This dispute resolution mechanism shall not be utilized to resolve disputes which could be addressed through the grievance arbitration procedure(s) set out in the applicable collective agreement. Should a dispute(s) arise between a signatory Union(s) and a signatory employer(s) regarding the application, interpretation or alleged violation of this Memorandum of Understanding, the parties concerned shall meet within 20 calendar days and attempt to resolve the dispute(s) through discussion. Should the dispute remain unresolved after such meetings, any party to the dispute may within a further 10 calendar days refer the matter(s) to arbitration. The parties to the dispute shall select a mutually agreed Arbitrator within 10 calendar days following such referral to arbitration. Should the parties fail to agree upon an Arbitrator, either party may forward a request to the Manitoba Labour board. The above time limits may be extended by mutual agreement and shall be confirmed in writing. The Arbitrator shall set his/her own procedures for hearing the dispute and may accept any evidence he/she deems appropriate. The decision of the Arbitrator shall be final and binding upon the parties to the dispute. Any costs incurred by either of the parties to the dispute, preceding or during arbitration proceedings, shall be borne by the parties incurring such costs, but cost of the Arbitrator shall be borne by the parties in equal share. SIGNED THIS DAY OF , 2019. CONCORDIA HOSPITAL INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL 987 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Between Concordia Hospital Health Sciences Centre Misericordia Health Centre Seven Oaks General Hospital Deer Lodge Centre Incorporated The Salvation Army Grace General Hospital - and the - International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 987 RE: IMPLEMENTATION OF STAFF MOBILITY Implementation and Interpretation of the "Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Staff Mobility Within the Nine Facilities of the WRHA System” (hereinafter referred to as "Staff Mobility Agreement"). This Memorandum is attached to and forms part of this Collective Agreement. Where a conflict exists between this Memorandum and the Staff Mobility Agreement, the terms of this Memorandum will supersede those of the aforementioned Memorandum. The parties agree to implement and interpret the Staff Mobility Agreement as follows:
Sample 1See All (8)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Staff Mobility Dispute Resolution Mechanism. This dispute resolution mechanism shall not be utilized to resolve disputes which could be addressed through the grievance arbitration procedure(s) set out in the applicable Collective Agreement. Should a dispute(s) arise between a signatory Union(s) and a signatory employer(s) regarding the application, interpretation or alleged violation of this Memorandum of Understanding, the parties concerned shall meet within twenty (20) calendar days and attempt to resolve the dispute(s) through discussion. Should the dispute remain unresolved after such meetings, any party to the dispute may, within a further ten (10) calendar days, refer the matter (s) to arbitration. The parties to the dispute shall select a mutually agreed Arbitrator within ten (10) calendar days following such referral to arbitration. Should the parties fail to agree upon an Arbitrator, either party may forward a request to the Manitoba Labour Board. The above time limits may be extended by mutual agreement and shall be confirmed in writing. The Arbitrator shall set his/her own procedures for hearing the dispute and may accept any evidence he/she deems appropriate. The decision of the Arbitrator shall be final and binding upon the parties to the dispute. Any costs incurred by either of the parties to the dispute, preceding or during arbitration proceedings, shall be borne by the parties incurring such costs, but cost of the Arbitrator shall be borne by the parties in equal shares. Dated this 20th day of June, 2000. Xxx Xxxxxx, C.E.O. Xxxxx Xxxxxx, President Deer Lodge Centre Inc. The Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Supplementary to the Collective Agreement Between DEER LODGE CENTRE INC. - and – THE PROFESSIONAL INSTITUTE OF THE PUBLIC SERVICE OF CANADA (Health Care Professional Group) Regarding
Sample 1Sample 2
Staff Mobility Dispute Resolution Mechanism. This dispute resolution mechanism shall not be utilized to resolve disputes which could be addressed through the grievance arbitration procedure(s) set out in the applicable collective agreement. Should a dispute(s) arise between a signatory Union(s) and a signatory Employer(s) regarding the application, interpretation or alleged violation of this Memorandum of Understanding, the parties concerned shall meet within twenty (20) calendar days and attempt to resolve the dispute(s) through discussion. Should the dispute remain unresolved after such meetings, any party to the dispute may within a further ten (10) calendar days refer the matter(s) to arbitration. The parties to the dispute shall select a mutually agreed Arbitrator within ten
Sample 1Sample 2
Staff Mobility Dispute Resolution Mechanism. This dispute resolution mechanism shall not be utilized to resolve disputes which could be addressed through the grievance arbitration procedure(s) set out in the applicable Collective Agreement. Should a dispute(s) arise regarding the application, interpretation or alleged violation of this Memorandum, the parties concerned shall meet within twenty
Sample 1
Staff Mobility Dispute Resolution Mechanism. This dispute resolution mechanism shall not be utilized to resolve disputes which could be addressed through the grievance arbitration procedure(s) set out in the applicable Collective Agreement. Should a dispute(s) arise regarding the application, interpretation or alleged violation of this Memorandum, the parties concerned shall meet within twenty (20) calendar days and attempt to resolve the dispute(s) through discussion. Should the dispute remain unresolved after such meetings, any party to the dispute may within a further ten (10) calendar days refer the matter(s) to arbitration. The parties to the dispute shall select a mutually agreed Arbitrator within ten (10) calendar days following such referral to arbitration. Should the parties fail to agree upon an Arbitrator, either party may forward a request to the Manitoba Labour Board. The above time limits may be extended by mutual agreement and shall be confirmed in writing. The Arbitrator shall set his/her own procedures for hearing the dispute and may accept any evidence he/she deems appropriate. The decision of the Arbitrator shall be final and binding upon the parties to the dispute. Any costs incurred by either of the parties to the dispute, preceding or during arbitration proceedings, shall be borne by the parties incurring such costs, but cost of the Arbitrator shall be borne by the parties in equal shares.
Sample 1

Related to Staff Mobility Dispute Resolution Mechanism

  • Dispute Resolution Mechanism a. Any dispute regarding the administration of the Institute at the Company or plant level shall be subject to expedited resolution by the Chairs of the Union and Company Negotiating Committees and the Executive Director of ICD who shall apply the policies, rules and regulations of the Governing Board and the provisions of this Section in ruling on any such dispute. Rulings of the Executive Director may be appealed to the Governing Board, but shall become and remain effective unless stayed or reversed by the Governing Board.

  • Dispute Resolution Mechanisms Registry Operator will comply with the following dispute resolution mechanisms as they may be revised from time to time:

  • Alternative Dispute Resolution Prior to filing of litigation, the parties may select non-binding mediation as a method of conflict resolution for issues arising out of or relating to this procurement process or any contract resulting from or any contemplated transaction. The parties agree that if non-binding mediation is chosen as a resolution process, the parties must agree to the chosen mediator(s) and that all mediation venue shall be at a location in Xxx Xxxxx County, Texas or agreed by the parties. The parties agree to share equally the cost of the mediation process and venue cost.

  • Dispute Resolution; Mediation (a) Either party may commence the dispute resolution process of this Section 8.2 by giving the other party written notice (a “Dispute Notice”) of any controversy, claim or dispute of whatever nature arising out of or relating to or in connection with this Agreement, any Ancillary Agreement or the breach, termination, enforceability or validity thereof (a “Dispute”) which has not been resolved in the normal course of business or as provided in the relevant Ancillary Agreement. The parties shall attempt in good faith to resolve any Dispute by negotiation between executives of each party (“Senior Party Representatives”) who have authority to settle the Dispute and, unless discussions between the parties are already at a senior management level, who are at a higher level of management than the Persons who have direct responsibility for the administration of this Agreement or the relevant Ancillary Agreement. Within fifteen (15) days after delivery of the Dispute Notice, the receiving party shall submit to the other a written response (the “Response”). The Dispute Notice and the Response shall include (i) a statement setting forth the position of the party giving such notice and a summary of arguments supporting such position and (ii) the name and title of such party’s Senior Party Representative and any other Persons who will accompany the Senior Party Representative at the meeting at which the parties will attempt to settle the Dispute. Within thirty (30) days after the delivery of the Dispute Notice, the Senior Party Representatives of both parties shall meet at a mutually acceptable time and place, and thereafter as often as they reasonably deem necessary, to attempt to resolve the Dispute. The parties shall cooperate in good faith with respect to any reasonable requests for exchanges of Information regarding the Dispute or a Response thereto.

  • Alternative Dispute Resolution Limitations This is a requirement of the TIPS Contract and is non-negotiable. TIPS, a department of Region 8 Education Service Center, a political subdivision, and local government entity of the State of Texas, does not agree to binding arbitration as a remedy to dispute and no such provision shall be permitted in this Agreement with TIPS. Vendor agrees that any claim arising out of or related to this Agreement, except those specifically and expressly waived or negotiated within this Agreement, may be subject to non-binding mediation at the request of either party to be conducted by a mutually agreed upon mediator as prerequisite to the filing of any lawsuit arising out of or related to this Agreement. Mediation shall be held in either Camp or Titus County, Texas. Agreements reached in mediation will be subject to the approval by the Region 8 ESC's Board of Directors, authorized signature of the Parties if approved by the Board of Directors, and, once approved by the Board of Directors and properly signed, shall thereafter be enforceable as provided by the laws of the State of Texas. Does Vendor agree? Yes, Vendor agrees Does Vendor agree? Yes, Vendor agrees No Waiver of TIPS Immunity This is a requirement of the TIPS Contract and is non-negotiable. Vendor agrees that nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as a waiver of sovereign or government immunity; nor constitute or be construed as a waiver of any of the privileges, rights, defenses, remedies, or immunities available to Region 8 Education Service Center or its TIPS Department. The failure to enforce, or any delay in the enforcement, of any privileges, rights, defenses, remedies, or immunities available to Region 8 Education Service Center or its TIPS Department under this Agreement or under applicable law shall not constitute a waiver of such privileges, rights, defenses, remedies, or immunities or be considered as a basis for estoppel. 5 Does Vendor agree? Yes, Vendor agrees

  • Third Party Dispute Resolution The Consulting Firm shall (i) consider only the items that are then disputed by the parties, (ii) shall be bound by the terms of the Agreement and (iii) shall only make a determination of such disputed matters in favor of the proposal made by the Purchasers or the Sellers (as may be presented by each party to the Consulting Firm in writing, which shall be shared with the other party) and shall not make an independent proposal. The Consulting Firm shall prepare a written determination of any disputed matters and deliver the determination to the Purchasers and the Sellers within fifteen (15) Business Days after the date the Consulting Firm is engaged. Each party shall cooperate fully with the Consulting Firm, including by using reasonable best efforts to provide the information, data and work papers to the extent permitted by applicable Law, so as to enable the Consulting Firm to make a determination of the disputed items as quickly as practicable. The Corrective Action Plan shall be finalized in accordance with the Consulting Firm’s determination of the disputed matters.

  • Dispute Resolution Procedure 21.1 All disputes or grievances arising between the Parties shall as far as practical be resolved at the workplace level through consultation. Accordingly the following procedure must be followed:

  • I2 Dispute Resolution I2.1 The Parties shall attempt in good faith to negotiate a settlement to any dispute between them arising out of or in connection with the Contract within twenty (20) Working Days of either Party notifying the other of the dispute and such efforts shall involve the escalation of the dispute to the finance director of the Contractor and the commercial director of the Authority.

  • Dispute Resolution Process Any claim, dispute or other matter in question not resolved by the process identified in Paragraph

  • CENTRAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS The following process pertains exclusively to disputes and grievances on central matters that have been referred to the central process. In accordance with the School Board Collective Bargaining Act, 2014 central matters may also be grieved locally, in which case local grievance processes will apply. In the event that central language is being grieved locally, the local parties shall provide the grievance to their respective central agents.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.