SPECIFIC THREATS PERCEIVED Sample Clauses

SPECIFIC THREATS PERCEIVED. Much of the concern about privacy one encounters in various investigations of its nature is framed around perceived risks of either having information disclosed to the wrong people or in damaging ways, or else around risks of losing control of personal information in some way so that its use is no longer available to you. Whilst, as noted above, a lot of the research about loss of control is quite general in nature, some research does drill a little more deeply into exactly what kinds of risks people think may confront them if they should lose control of their data in some way. The specific risks people may associate with having their personal information exposed to third parties are diverse. One such concern is with how exposure may result in damage to people’s identities in some way (Xxxxxxx et al, 2013; Xxxxxxx & Xxxxxx, 2007; Xxxxxxxxxxx, 2008; Xxxx et al, 2008), such as identity theft, where a malicious party impersonates a victim (Xxxxx & Xxxxxxx, 2003). Other concerns may be seen to attach to the risk of exposing what might be termed ‘negative information’ or conveying a negative impression, with this in turn being used for various dubious ends such as shame and exposure, retribution, bullying, or even blackmail (Xxxxxxxxx & Xxxxxxxx, 2001; Xxxxx et al, 2012; Xxxx & Xxxxxx, 2013; Xxxxx & Xxxxxxx, 2003; Xxxxx et al, 2012; Sleeper et al, 2013). Xxxxx and Dourish (2003) also suggest that people have concerns about surveillance from a variety of sources (including employers) and unwanted government inspection of their activity. Others such as Xxxxxxx et al (2009) point to concerns people have regarding the risk of financial loss as a result of conducting online transactions and note that a number of people adopt certain strategies such as not undertaking online purchases or online banking in public locations, to try and limit the risk of having their accounts hacked.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to SPECIFIC THREATS PERCEIVED

  • Elements Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Proficient Exemplary IV-A-1. Reflective Practice Demonstrates limited reflection on practice and/or use of insights gained to improve practice. May reflect on the effectiveness of lessons/ units and interactions with students but not with colleagues and/or rarely uses insights to improve practice. Regularly reflects on the effectiveness of lessons, units, and interactions with students, both individually and with colleagues, and uses insights gained to improve practice and student learning. Regularly reflects on the effectiveness of lessons, units, and interactions with students, both individually and with colleagues; and uses and shares with colleagues, insights gained to improve practice and student learning. Is able to model this element.

  • Excellent Above Average Satisfactory Needs Improvement Unsatisfactory 5 4 3 2 1 5. The instructor demonstrates knowledge of the subject matter.

  • Conflict of Interest – Subrecipient’s Personnel The Subrecipient shall exercise reasonable care and diligence to prevent any actions or conditions that could result in a conflict with the best interests of the County. This obligation shall apply to the Subrecipient; the Subrecipient’s employees, agents, and subcontractors associated with accomplishing work and services hereunder. The Subrecipient’s efforts shall include, but not be limited to establishing precautions to prevent its employees, agents, and subcontractors from providing or offering gifts, entertainment, payments, loans or other considerations which could be deemed to influence or appear to influence County staff or elected officers from acting in the best interests of the County.

  • Conflict of Interest Contractor Personnel 2.5.1 The A-E shall exercise reasonable care and diligence to prevent any actions or conditions that could result in a conflict with the best interests of the COUNTY. This obligation shall apply to the A-E; the A-E’s employees, agents, and relatives; sub-tier contractors; and third parties associated with accomplishing work and PROJECTS/SERVICES hereunder.

  • Criminal History Category With regard to determining defendant’s criminal history points and criminal history category, based on the facts now known to the government, defendant’s criminal history points equal zero and defendant’s criminal history category is I.

  • Conflict of Interest Questionnaire Requirement Vendor agrees that it has looked up, read, and understood the current version of Texas Local Government Code Chapter 176 which generally requires disclosures of conflicts of interests by Vendor hereunder if Vendor:

  • Teaching Staff Assigned to More Than One Building Each Educator who is assigned to more than one building will be evaluated by the appropriate administrator where the individual is assigned most of the time. The principal of each building in which the Educator serves must review and sign the evaluation, and may add written comments. In cases where there is no predominate assignment, the superintendent will determine who the primary evaluator will be.

  • Reasonable Suspicion Testing The Employer may, but does not have a legal duty to, request or require an employee to undergo drug and alcohol testing if the Employer or any supervisor of the employee has a reasonable suspicion (a belief based on specific facts and rational inferences drawn from those facts) related to the performance of the job that the employee:

  • Conflict of Interest – Contractor’s Personnel The Contractor shall exercise reasonable care and diligence to prevent any actions or conditions that could result in a conflict with the best interests of the County. This obligation shall apply to the Contractor; the Contractor’s employees, agents, and subcontractors associated with accomplishing work and services hereunder. The Contractor’s efforts shall include, but not be limited to establishing precautions to prevent its employees, agents, and subcontractors from providing or offering gifts, entertainment, payments, loans or other considerations which could be deemed to influence or appear to influence County staff or elected officers from acting in the best interests of the County.

  • Staffing Levels to deal with Potential Violence The Employer agrees that, where there is a risk of violence, an adequate level of trained employees should be present. The Employer recognizes that workloads can lead to fatigue and a diminished ability both to identify and to subsequently deal with potentially violent situations.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.