Loss of Control. 1. Tree work is a controlled task. At no time should work be performed so as to result in a loss of control incident (e.g. free-falling large limbs or trunk sections, hinge cutting, lack of safety apparatus/equipment guards, improper use/loading of equipment).
Loss of Control. If KNOC Korea ceases at any time to have Control of the Borrower without the prior written consent of the Majority Lenders.
Loss of Control. (a) NEG shall fail to (i) directly or indirectly own more than 50% of the equity interests in Borrower and (ii) control the fundamental management decisions of Borrower (whether through direct or indirect control of the governing body of Borrower, through a management services agreement with Borrower or otherwise), provided that the possession by a Person other than NEG of a veto power over material events with respect to Borrower (e.g., dissolution of Borrower, merger or consolidation of Borrower, sale of all or substantially all assets of Borrower, material amendments to Borrower's organizational documents) shall not in and of itself constitute a failure by NEG to control the fundamental management decisions of Borrower, or (b) except as provided in Section 6.4, Borrower shall fail to directly or indirectly own, through the applicable Approved Intermediate Holding Companies, 100% of the equity and voting interests in the Approved Project Companies.
Loss of Control. (a) Calpine shall cease to own directly or indirectly 100% of the partnership interests in Borrower or (b) except for (x) Subsequent Projects approved pursuant to Section 3.3 which are at least fifty percent (50%) owned by Borrower, (y) Unfunded Subsequent Projects or (z) as permitted in Section 6.4.2, Borrower shall cease to own 100% of any Project.
Loss of Control. 12(e)(1)
Loss of Control. (a) All or substantially all of the assets of a Project Company shall be sold, leased, licensed, assigned, pledged, transferred or otherwise disposed of by such Project Company without XLCA's prior written consent (if XLCA is the Controlling Party), other than pursuant to a Permitted Peaker Buyout, or (b) NRG Energy shall fail to directly or indirectly own 100% of the membership interests in the Issuer or any Project Company and control the fundamental management decisions of the Issuer or any Project Company other than in connection with (i) a Permitted Peaker Buyout or (ii) a Permitted Change of Control.
Loss of Control. (a) Calpine shall cease to indirectly own 100% of the ownership interests in Borrower, (b) the Partners shall cease to directly own 100% of the partnership interests in Borrower, (c) Borrower shall cease to directly or indirectly own 100% of the ownership interests in each of the other Portfolio Entities, or (d) except for (i) the Lost Pines 107 Project or Projects approved pursuant to Section 3.3 which are at least 50% owned by a Project Owner, or (ii) as otherwise permitted pursuant to Section 6.4.2, a Project Owner shall cease to directly own or, with respect to Turbines and other equipment leased pursuant to Equipment Leases, lease 100% of its respective Project.
Loss of Control. For software-as-a-service (SaaS) and some platform-as-a-service (PaaS) and infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) solutions, the total control of hardware, software, security policies, etc., is placed in the hands of the external Cloud provider. Integration. Sometimes Public Authorities will need to integrate their internal systems with the external Cloud systems. This integration can be challenging. Availability and reliability of cloud applications. The combination of server performance, configuration errors, network design, and application architecture, may cause performance issues that are difficult to resolve. Cloud service provider lock-in. The concern is that the adoption of a Cloud Solution from a provider might make difficult the switching to a different provider. Governments around the world have started to elaborate strategies in order to harness the benefits of cloud computing. In 2011, Xxxxx Xxxxxx the U.S. Chief Information Officer, presented the Cloud First policy for Federal’s Government bodies [10]. This policy is intended to accelerate the pace at which the government will realize the value of cloud computing by requiring agencies to evaluate safe, secure cloud computing options before making any new investments. In a similar way, Canada and UK Governments have adopted a Cloud First approach to public services provisioning [12,13]. In September 2012, the European Commission adopted a strategy for “Unleashing the Potential of Cloud Computing in Europe”. The strategy is designed to speed up and increase the use of cloud computing across all economic sectors [14]. Despite the existence of the “Cloud First” policies, which mandates Government Agencies to take full advantage of cloud computing benefits to maximize capacity utilization, improve IT flexibility and responsiveness, and minimize cost, Public Authorities worldwide are not yet comfortable using Cloud Solutions. The STORM CLOUDS solutions aim to contribute, both methodologically and technically, to this problem.
Loss of Control. The percentage of Framatomes direct interest in the Securities and voting rights comprising the capital stock of the Borrower falls to 66.67% or less.
Loss of Control. For software-as-a-service (SaaS) and some platform-as-a-service (PaaS) and infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) solutions, the total control of hardware, software, security policies, etc., is placed in the hands of the external Cloud provider. Integration. Sometimes Public Authorities will need to integrate their internal systems with the external Cloud systems. This integration can be challenging. Availability and reliability of cloud applications. The combination of server performance, configuration errors, network design, and application architecture, may cause performance issues that are difficult to resolve. Cloud service provider lock-in. The concern is that the adoption of a Cloud Solution (PaaS or IaaS) of one provider may make difficult the switching to an equivalent cloud solution in a different provider. Governments around the world have started to elaborate strategies in order to harness the benefits of cloud computing. In 2011, Xxxxx Xxxxxx the U.S. Chief Information Officer, presented the Cloud First policy for Federal’s Government bodies [11]. This policy is intended to accelerate the pace at which the government will realize the value of cloud computing by requiring agencies to evaluate safe, secure cloud computing options before making any new investments. In a similar way, Canada and UK Governments have adopted a Cloud First approach to public services provisioning [12,13]. In September 2012, the European Commission adopted a strategy for “Unleashing the Potential of Cloud Computing in Europe”. The strategy is designed to speed up and increase the use of cloud computing across all economic sectors [14]. Despite the existence of the “Cloud First” policies, which mandates Government Agencies to take full advantage of cloud computing benefits to maximize capacity utilization, improve IT flexibility and responsiveness, and minimize cost, Public Authorities worldwide are not yet comfortable using Cloud Solutions. The STORM CLOUDS solutions aim to contribute, both methodologically and technically, to this problem.
