Proposed Amendments to the MoP Rules of Procedure Sample Clauses

Proposed Amendments to the MoP Rules of Procedure. 2.2.1 Australia introduced MoP6 Doc 06 that proposes amending Rule 24 of the Rules of Procedure for the MoP to correct an error in paragraph 5 of the rule. The paragraph refers to a ‘time frame’ for responses received by the Secretariat that refers to the time frame specified in ‘paragraph 1’ of Rule 24. The relevant ‘time frame’ for responses is provided in ‘paragraph 3’ of Rule 24.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Proposed Amendments to the MoP Rules of Procedure. The interim Secretariat will present a paper proposing a number of amendments to the Rules of Procedure of the Meeting of the Parties. Parties are invited to give consideration to the adoption of the proposed amendments. 2.3.
Sample 1
Proposed Amendments to the MoP Rules of Procedure. 2.2.1 The Chair of the Intersessional Committee established by Resolution 4.8 tabled the report of the Committee to the MoP (MoP5 Doc 29). The Chair expressed his appreciation for the engagement of Parties in the Committee’s work during the intersessional period. The report summarises matters considered intersessionally and contains a proposal to amend Rule 4 of the MoP Rules of Procedure, to remove a potential ambiguity for some Parties concerning the wording of Rule 4(1) and, to include new sub-rules that would enable applications for participation by any member economy of the Asia Pacific Economic Co-operation Forum whose vessels fish within the range of albatrosses and petrels (‘relevant APEC member economies’) in sessions of the MoP and its subsidiary bodies, unless one-third of Parties objected. An intersessional vote on the proposal had occurred, but consensus was not achieved. Under the MoP Rules of Procedure, the matter was referred to MoP5 for consideration and decision.
Sample 1
Proposed Amendments to the MoP Rules of Procedure. 2.2.1 Australia presented MoP4 Doc 06 noting that, if ACAP is to achieve its conservation objective, it is essential that ACAP promptly develop a close and co-operative relationship with all States and APEC member economies whose vessels fish within the range of albatrosses and petrels listed under Annex 1 of the Agreement. In particular, improved relationships with those States and economies with distant water longlining fleets are a high priority. To this end, Australia welcomed the approach of ACAP Parties to facilitating the participation of a wide range of observers. This is consistent with the provisions of the Agreement which encourage those concerned with the conservation and management of albatrosses and petrels to participate as observers in sessions of the MoP and its subsidiary bodies.
Sample 1

Related to Proposed Amendments to the MoP Rules of Procedure

  • Model Rules of Procedure 1. The procedure before the Panel shall be conducted in accordance with the Model Rules of Procedure set out in Annex 12 (Model Rules of Procedure). Exceptionally, the disputing Parties may agree on different rules to be applied by the Panel. 2. The Model Rules of Procedure are necessary for the good development of all the steps in this Chapter. In addition, these rules shall regulate the development of the procedure, pursuant to the following principles: (a) the procedures shall ensure the right to at least one hearing before the Panel, as well as the opportunity for each disputing Party to provide initial and rebuttal written submissions, and allow the use of any technological means to ensure its authenticity; and (b) the hearings before the Panel, the deliberations, as well as all the submissions and communications submitted during the hearings, shall be confidential. 3. If needed, the Panel shall, apart from the matters set out in this Article and in Annex 12 (Model Rules of Procedure), regulate its own procedures in relation to the settlement of the dispute in consultation with the Parties. 4. Unless otherwise agreed by the disputing Parties within 20 days following the establishment of the Panel, the terms of reference shall be: "To examine, in light of the relevant provisions of this Agreement, the matter referred to in the request for the establishment of a Panel pursuant to Article 177 (Request for a Panel) and to make findings of law and fact together with the reasons therefore for the resolution of the dispute, as well as a recommendation for its implementation, if needed."

  • Rules of Procedure By referring any specific grievance to be dealt with in the expedited arbitration procedure it is understood and agreed that the matter is to be dealt with in accordance with the Rules of Procedure attached to this Agreement as Appendix 1.

  • Lay-off Procedure (a) In the event of lay-off, the Employer shall first lay-off Employees in the reverse order of their seniority within their classification, provided that there remain on the job Employees who have the skills to perform the work.

  • Layoff Procedure a) In the event of lay-off, the employer shall lay-off employees in the reverse order of their seniority within their classification, provided that there remain on the job employees who have the ability and qualifications as required by law to perform the work.

  • Purpose; Incorporation by Reference of Auction Procedures and Settlement Procedures (a) On each Auction Date, the provisions of the Auction Procedures will be followed by the Auction Agent for the purpose of determining the Applicable Rate for the of APS, for the next Dividend Period therefor. Each periodic operation of such procedures is hereinafter referred to as an "Auction."

  • MANDATORY FORUM SELECTION TO INDUCE LENDER TO MAKE THE LOANS, CREDIT PARTIES IRREVOCABLY AGREE THAT ANY DISPUTE ARISING UNDER, RELATING TO, OR IN CONNECTION WITH, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, THIS AGREEMENT OR RELATED TO ANY MATTER WHICH IS THE SUBJECT OF OR INCIDENTAL TO THIS AGREEMENT ANY OTHER LOAN DOCUMENT, OR THE COLLATERAL (WHETHER OR NOT SUCH CLAIM IS BASED UPON BREACH OF CONTRACT OR TORT) SHALL, EXCEPT AS HEREINAFTER PROVIDED, BE SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION AND VENUE OF THE STATE AND/OR FEDERAL COURTS LOCATED IN BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, LENDER MAY, AT LENDER’S SOLE OPTION, ELECT TO BRING ANY ACTION IN ANY OTHER JURISDICTION. THIS PROVISION IS INTENDED TO BE A “MANDATORY” FORUM SELECTION CLAUSE AND GOVERNED BY AND INTERPRETED CONSISTENT WITH FLORIDA LAW. BORROWER HEREBY CONSENTS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION AND VENUE OF ANY STATE OR FEDERAL COURT HAVING ITS SITUS IN SAID COUNTY (OR TO ANY OTHER JURISDICTION OR VENUE, IF LENDER SO ELECTS), AND WAIVES ANY OBJECTION BASED ON FORUM NON CONVENIENS. CREDIT PARTIES HEREBY WAIVE PERSONAL SERVICE OF ANY AND ALL PROCESS AND CONSENTS THAT ALL SUCH SERVICE OF PROCESS MAY BE MADE BY CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, DIRECTED TO BORROWER, AS SET FORTH HEREIN OR IN THE MANNER PROVIDED BY APPLICABLE STATUTE, LAW, RULE OF COURT OR OTHERWISE.

  • Adoption of Procedures State Street and each Fund may from time to time adopt such procedures as they agree upon, and State Street may conclusively assume that no procedure approved or directed by a Fund, a Fund’s or Portfolio’s accountants or other advisors conflicts with or violates any requirements of the prospectus, articles of incorporation, bylaws, declaration of trust, any applicable law, rule or regulation, or any order, decree or agreement by which the Fund may be bound. Each Fund will be responsible for notifying State Street of any changes in statutes, regulations, rules, requirements or policies which may impact State Street responsibilities or procedures under this Agreement.

  • Governing Law; Forum Selection This contract is governed by the laws of the State of Alaska. To the extent not otherwise governed by Article 3 of this Appendix, any claim concerning this contract shall be brought only in the Superior Court of the State of Alaska and not elsewhere.

  • Amendments to Servicing Agreements, Modification of Standard Provisions (a) Subject to the prior written consent of the Trustee pursuant to Section 3.07(b), the Master Servicer from time to time may, to the extent permitted by the applicable Servicing Agreement, make such modifications and amendments to such Servicing Agreement as the Master Servicer deems necessary or appropriate to confirm or carry out more fully the intent and purpose of such Servicing Agreement and the duties, responsibilities and obligations to be performed by the Servicer thereunder. Such modifications may only be made if they are consistent with the REMIC Provisions, as evidenced by an Opinion of Counsel. Prior to the issuance of any modification or amendment, the Master Servicer shall deliver to the Trustee such Opinion of Counsel and an Officer's Certificate setting forth (i) the provision that is to be modified or amended, (ii) the modification or amendment that the Master Servicer desires to issue and (iii) the reason or reasons for such proposed amendment or modification.

  • Governing Law and Forum Selection This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Nevada. Any action or proceeding concerning the construction, or interpretation of the terms of this Agreement or any claim or dispute between the parties shall be commenced and heard in the Second Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada, in and for the County of Washoe, Reno, Nevada.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.