Procedural. Gatekeeping is the programme of work associated with making a decision as to whether to commence an assessment in respect of a country, by reference to numerous policy factors reflecting HMG and UK interests. • Assessment is the programme of work associated with collecting and analysing information relating to the level of data protection in another country. • Recommendation is the programme of work associated with the DCMS UK Adequacy Assessment team making a recommendation to the Secretary of State who will then decide whether to make a finding of adequacy and make UK Adequacy Regulations in respect of another country. • Procedural is the programme of work associated with making the relevant UK Adequacy Regulations, laying these in Parliament, and any subsequent publication of the ICO’s opinion. • The ICO’s role in relation to UK Adequacy Assessment Work – in line with its independent regulatory role and statutory responsibilities – includes: • During the Gatekeeping and Assessment phases in response to being engaged by officials in DCMS: providing comments and advice to DCMS officials, including via provision of relevant factual information that relate to a country’s data protection laws and practices (e.g. the role and effectiveness of the relevant country’s regulator); • During the Recommendation phase: providing a response on the draft conclusions of a DCMS assessment so that the Commissioner’s view can be included in the recommendation to the Secretary of State and factored into their decision making. In forming its view, the ICO will consider, inter alia, the features of a country’s data protection laws and practices in the round, recognising that different countries have different ways of ensuring adequate levels of data protection; and • During the Procedural phase: providing advice and/or an opinion to Parliament, including on the process followed and the factors taken into consideration by the DCMS Adequacy Assessment team and the Secretary of State. • The Parties agree, where appropriate, to provide assistance to each other, in light of their particular roles, as set out below: DCMS ICO Gatekeeping Share factual research Provide comments and and analysis relating to advice, including factual countries’ data protection information to supplement laws and practices. DCMS research and Share information on analysis, especially on which countries are being issues the ICO is well- considered as potential placed to comment on (e.g. candidates for futu...
Procedural. The Joint Management Board will meet at least monthly The Quorum for the Joint Management Group shall be at least three representatives of the Local Authority (which shall include the Chair or such person as the Chair shall nominate to act as chair in his absence) and three representatives of the Trust. The Joint Management Board shall decide all other procedural arrangements under which it operates.
Procedural. 3.1.1. I agree to cooperate with CD in accurately presenting my services and qualifications to the public at large in order to avoid confusion and misrepresentation, and to make every effort to ensure that public media identifies me correctly.
Procedural. During a quarterly meeting, the proposed new member shall be nominated by one existing JIP Team member and that nomination must be seconded by a second existing JIP team member. Once nominated, the JIP team members present at the meeting will consider the applicant’s eligibility based on the services and categories provided in bullet 1, above. Once all considerations have been heard, if the nominated entity is determined to be eligible, JIP Team members will subject the nomination to a vote. Membership will require consensus among the existing membership. If consensus is achieved, then membership will be granted. The new member will commit to supporting JIP development and providing one or more services identified above. Once the new member is elected, their name, role, commitment(s), and date of election to membership shall be added to this document. The undersigned agree to this letter of agreement on behalf of the agency represented: PORT OF ANACORTES
Procedural. On May 5, 2020, THR filed the Complaint. ECF 1. On December 18, 2020, the government filed the Answer, with the Settlement Agreement attached as an exhibit. ECF 11. On February 4, 2021, the government moved for judgment on the pleadings based on the Settlement Agreement. ECF 12. T.
Procedural. All meetings are open to the public. Please note that the meetings may close early if all business is finished. At the Chairs’ discretion, members of the public may make oral presentations during the meetings. If you would like to make an oral presentation at a meeting, please notify the Executive Director no later than April 10, 2002. Written material for distribution at a meeting should reach the Coast Guard no later than April 10, 2002. If you would like a copy of your material distributed to each member of the committee or subcommittee in advance of a meeting, please submit 25 copies to the Executive Director no later than April 10, 2002. Information on Services for Individuals with Disabilities For information on facilities or services for individuals With disabilities or to request special assistance at the meetings, contact the Executive Director as soon as possible. Dated: March 25, 2002. Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxx, Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Director of Operations Policy. [FR Doc. 02–7829 Filed 4–1–02; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–15–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration [Summary Notice No. PE–2002–25] Petitions for Exemption; Dispositions of Petitions Issued AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of dispositions of prior petitions. SUMMARY: Pursuant to FAA’s rulemaking provisions governing the application, processing, and disposition of petitions for exemption part 11 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), this notice contains a summary of dispositions of certain petitions previously received. The purpose of this notice is to improve the public’s awareness of, and participation in, this aspect of FAA’s regulatory activities. Neither publication of this notice nor the inclusion or omission of information in the summary is intended to affect the legal status. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Xxxxxx Xxxxxx (202) 267–5174, Office of Rulemaking (ARM–1), Federal Aviation Administration, 000 Xxxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx, XX., Xxxxxxxxxx, XX 00000. This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85 and 11.91. Issued in Washington, DC, on March 27, 2002. Xxxx X. Xxxxxx, Acting Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations. Dispositions of Petitions Docket No.: FAA–2002–11716. Petitioner: Falcon Aviation Consultants, Inc.
Procedural a. Gatekeeping is the programme of work associated with making a decision as to whether to commence an assessment in respect of a country, by reference to numerous policy factors reflecting HMG and UK interests.
Procedural. 1. The procedure to be followed by the offeree if he wishes to accept the offer.
Procedural. 1) The discussions will take place in the style of a book club, where we’ll discuss set reading based around a few questions or discussion points provided in advance.
Procedural. 17.1 A Bondholders' meeting shall be held at the request
