PDS2 Sample Clauses

PDS2. Residents queried the need for hotel and commercial development at the “CDA” site and object hotel development above the proposed PTT. Some suggested that an open-air PTT would be more preferable instead of enclosed design. - Apart from retail, commercial and hotel uses, they called for alternatives land use proposals (e.g. open space for leisure and recreation uses, G/IC for community uses, other innovative land use proposals and etc.) for the public to comment and choose. Simply presenting variations in development parameters of the same land use proposal was not adequate. - They generally considered the proposed plot ratio and building height of PDS2 was too high and suggested the development density and building height should be lower than that of Whampoa Garden. - Their proposed plot ratio ranged from 0 to 4.5. - They suggested to impose stepping down profile of both building height and plot ratio towards waterfront. - The public supported the provision of urban park but considered that the proposed size was not adequate. They suggested extending the proposed urban park to cover the whole or part of the “CDA” site. - They suggested the Government to include conditions relating to disposition and allocation of buildings in the Conditions of Sale / OZP to avoid “wall-like” development and preserve the view corridor.