Partner Solution Review Clause Samples

Partner Solution Review. The Partner Solution (including any Authorization) must be a Partner Solution that is reviewed and approved by SAP in advance in accordance with SAP’s standard practices before Partner may promote or make it available to its Customers or third parties for use in conjunction with any SAP cloud service or software (“Authorized Scope”). Partner agrees to provide such information about the Partner Solution and/or any Authorization as reasonably requested by ▇▇▇. SAP may deny or withhold approval in its sole discretion. ▇▇▇’s approval of the Partner Solution and/or associated Authorization is not, and will not be construed or represented by Partner to any third party to be a verification of the Partner Solution and/or associated Authorization functionality or any support, preference, warranty or endorsement of such by SAP in any way.

Related to Partner Solution Review

  • Position Review 18.3.1 Either an employee or the University may request an audit of the duties and responsibilities of a position he/she/it believes is not allocated to the proper class. Employees requesting such an audit are expected to notify the Union at the time of their request. 18.3.2 Job audits will be performed and reclassification decisions will be made by the University’s Human Resources Services staff according to the University’s Classification Process. The affected employee(s) and the Union will be notified of the outcome of a job audit in writing. In the event of a reallocation that results in removal of a position from the bargaining unit, the written notice will describe the manner in which the bargaining unit work is being distributed, including the classification and position(s) of any employee(s) absorbing work from the reallocated position. 18.3.3 If an employee disagrees with a classification decision made by the Human Resources staff, the employee may request review of that decision through the Director of OFM/State Human Resources within 30 (thirty) calendar days of receiving the final allocation decision from the University. Should the employee disagree with the Director’s decision, the employee may further appeal the matter to the Washington Personnel Resources Board within 30 (thirty) calendar days of being provided the written decision of the Director. The Board will render a decision, which will be final and binding. Decisions regarding appropriate classification will be reviewed in accordance with this Section and will not be subject to the grievance procedure specified in Article 40 of this Agreement.

  • Program Review The State ECEAP Office will conduct a review of each contractor’s compliance with the ECEAP Contract and ECEAP Performance Standards every four years. The review will involve ECEAP staff and parents. After the Program Review, the State ECEAP Office will provide the contractor with a Program Review report. The contractor must submit an ECEAP Corrective Action Plan for non-compliance with ECEAP Performance Standards. The Plan must be approved by the State ECEAP Office.

  • Transition Review Period In accordance with Article 35, Layoff and Recall, the Employer may require an employee to complete a transition review period.

  • Joint Commercialization Committee Upon a decision by the JSC to activate the joint Commercialization committee, but in no case later than eighteen (18) months prior to the projected First Commercial Sale (the “Joint Commercialization Committee” or “JCC”), the Parties shall establish the JCC. The JCC shall hold its initial meeting within thirty (30) days of its establishment. Following its initial meeting, the JCC will meet in person, by teleconference or by video-teleconference at least [***] per [***] to review and discuss material decisions and key activities that relate to the matters set forth below. The JCC will be responsible for the communication, review and discussion of the Commercialization Plan and other Commercialization matters, including marketing strategy and planning, pricing, commercial manufacture, and [***], in each case in the Territory. Without limiting the foregoing, the JCC shall be responsible for: (a) reviewing and consulting with Coherus on the Commercialization Plan prior to adoption of the Commercialization Plan or changes by Licensee; (b) recommending the Commercialization Plan for approval by the JSC prior to adoption of the Commercialization Plan; (c) communicating with the JDC regarding the interrelationship between Development activities and potential Commercialization activities; (d) reviewing and monitoring the activities and progress against the Commercialization Plan; (e) monitoring and reporting on the competitive landscape for the Product in the Territory; (f) establishing appropriate processes for coordinating review of promotional materials for the Territory to ensure compliance with Applicable Laws and industry best practices; (g) overseeing the trademark and publication strategies for the Territory; and (h) communicating with the Parties regarding all of the foregoing.

  • Local Professional Development Committee A. There shall be a Local Professional Development Committee (LPDC) to oversee, review, and approve individual professional development plans (IPDP) for course work, continuing education units and/or other equivalent activities. 1. The LPDC shall be responsible to recommend for the Superintendent’s approval, all in-service activities and workshops offered in the district during the school year for staff professional development. 2. Recommendations for District Workshops and In-Service activities should be submitted to the LPDC for approval and recommendation no later than the last school day of the year prior to the year it will be implemented. 3. The LPDC chair shall review and approve all “Professional Growth Reimbursement Application” forms. B. The LPDC shall consist of three (3) teachers appointed by the Association President and two (2) members appointed by the Superintendent. One of the Superintendent's appointees will be a Principal employed by the district. C. Appointments shall be for two (2) years with half of the committee members being appointed every other year. 1. Appointments shall be made on or before May 1. 2. The Appointments shall be made by each party outlined above, notifying the other of those appointed. 3. In the event of a vacancy, the committee members shall be replaced in accordance with "B." above. 4. The Association shall name a fourth teacher member and the Superintendent shall name a third administrative member to serve as alternates and attend trainings. These two (2) people shall act as substitutes when a committee member is absent. D. This committee shall meet monthly. 1. The committee may also be convened by the request of two sitting members. 2. A quorum shall consist of five (5) members. When administrative licenses/certificates are reviewed, two (2) sitting teacher members will abstain and the decision will be decided by three (3) members. 3. If the committee determines it is needed, they will be provided two (2) professional release days to meet during regular school hours. Substitutes will be provided for the committee members on these release days. 4. Committee members shall be provided an additional annual stipend of $1,000 for meetings beyond the normal work day or year. This stipend shall be paid in two (2) semi-annual payments. Any member who fails to serve the full year shall have the above compensation prorated on a monthly basis for each month served. 5. Decisions of the LPDC will be made by consensus of the committee members present. 6. The committee minutes shall be prepared and maintained in compliance with the laws governing the operation of committees of public bodies.