Grant Criteria Sample Clauses

Grant Criteria. The criteria used to review applications for grant funds shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Grant Criteria. Grantee shall comply with the following conditions in order to qualify for initial and continuing grant payments pursuant to this Agreement. These conditions shall hereinafter be referred to as the “Grant Criteria.”
Grant Criteria. Within 45 days following entry of the Final Order and Judgment, the DAGP Administrator will develop procedures for the award of grants (“DAGP Grants”) to medical providers (such providers being “DAGP Grantees”), and for the monitoring of the use of DAGP Grant funds by such DAGP Grantees. These procedures shall include grant application contents and contracting protocols meeting the requirements set forth in this Section 8.3. The procedures shall also include guidelines for the selection of DAGP Grantees and the determination of the amount of individual DAGP Grants. The guidelines shall provide for the selection of DAGP Grantees and determination of DAGP Grant amounts consistent with the requirements of this Section 8.3 and in a manner that the DAGP Administrator determines will increase the availability of NHL Diagnostic Evaluation to the greatest number of DAGP Eligible Settlement Class Members in the service areas identified in the List of Service Areas (and elsewhere as consistent with Section 8.3(b)(iii)), taking into account the following criteria, as well as the limitations imposed in Section 8.3(b):
Grant Criteria. In selecting applicants for grants under this section, the Secretary shall consider—
Grant Criteria 

Related to Grant Criteria

  • Award Criteria 40.1 The Procuring Entity shall award the Contract to the successful tenderer whose tender has been determined to be the Lowest Evaluated Tender in accordance with procedures in Section 3: Evaluation and Qualification Criteria.

  • Performance Criteria The Performance Criteria are set forth in Exhibit A to this Agreement.

  • Performance Goals A. The Trust and State Street have developed mutually acceptable performance goals dated March 1, 2011 , and as may be amended from time to time, regarding the manner in which they expect to deliver and receive the services under this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as “Service Level Agreement”). The parties agree that such Service Level Agreement reflects performance goals and any failure to perform in accordance with the provisions thereof shall not be considered a breach of contract that gives rise to contractual or other remedies. It is the intention of the parties that the sole remedy for failure to perform in accordance with the provisions of the Service Level Agreement, or any dispute relating to performance goals set forth in the Service Level Agreement, will be a meeting of the parties to resolve the failure pursuant to the consultation procedure described in Sections V. B. and V.C. below. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties hereby acknowledge that any party’s failure (or lack thereof) to meet the provisions of the Service Level Agreement, while not in and of itself a breach of contract giving rise to contractual or other remedies, may factor into the Trust’s reasonably determined belief regarding the standard of care exercised by State Street hereunder.

  • Selection Criteria for Awarding Task Order The Government will award to the offeror whose proposal is deemed most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment using the evaluation criteria. The Government will evaluate proposals against established selection criteria specified in the task order RFP. Generally, the Government's award decision will be based on selection criteria which addresses past performance, technical acceptability, proposal risk and cost. Among other sources, evaluation of past performance may be based on past performance assessments provided by TO Program Managers on individual task orders performed throughout the life of the contract. The order of importance for the factors will be identified in the RFP for the specified task order.

  • PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES 4.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) sets out-

  • Selection Criteria Each Contract is secured by a new or used Motorcycle. No Contract has a Contract Rate less than 1.00%. Each Contract amortizes the amount financed over an original term no greater than 84 months (excluding periods of deferral of first payment). Each Contract has a Principal Balance of at least $500.00 as of the Cutoff Date.

  • Grant Award On and subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, Triumph hereby agrees to make a grant (the “Grant”) to Grantee in the aggregate maximum amount of up to Two Hundred Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($200,000.00) (the “Maximum Grant Amount”) to provide partial funding for the Project.

  • Key Objectives This Agreement has been jointly developed by X X Xxxxxxxxxx Electrics Pty Ltd and its employees with the purpose of developing and implementing workplace reform strategies so as to produce a continuous improvement environment aimed directly at improving the competitiveness of the Company within the marketplace, thus delivering projects on time and within budget along with job satisfaction and job security for employees. The primary objective of the Company is to provide safe, efficient and highly productive labour and services to its Client. The performance of every employee is critical to achieving the Company’s objectives and the employee agrees to actively co-operate with management and supervisors in order to achieve high levels of safety, productivity and cost efficient operations.

  • General Criteria a) Approved varieties shall be those varieties recommended by the Department, the Corporation, or those listed in the Atlantic Provinces Field Crop Guide, Publication 100A.

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.