Failure to Render a Decision Sample Clauses

Failure to Render a Decision. Failure to render a decision at any step of this procedure within the specified time limits shall permit the grievance to proceed to the next step.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Failure to Render a Decision. Failure to render a response or decision at any step of this procedure within the specified time limits shall permit the appropriate party to proceed to the next step.
Failure to Render a Decision. If the arbitrator fails to render a decision within thirty (30) Days following the final hearing of the arbitration, any party to the arbitration may terminate the appointment of the arbitrator and a new arbitrator shall be appointed in accordance with these provisions. If Nipigon LNG and the Customer are unable to agree on a an arbitrator or if the appointment of an arbitrator is terminated in the manner provided for above, then either Nipigon LNG or the Customer shall be entitled to apply to a judge of Ontario Supreme Court to appoint an arbitrator and the arbitrator so appointed shall proceed to determine the matter mutatis mutandis in accordance with the provisions of this Article 14.

Related to Failure to Render a Decision

  • Failure to Return Failure of the employee to return pursuant to the date determined in this Section will constitute grounds for termination by the School District unless the School District and the employee mutually agree to an extension of the leave.

  • Failure to Respond If you fail to respond by the date given above, your application will be refused under Section 3A(4)(a) of the Registered Designs Act 1949.

  • Notification of Decision The Committee shall consider a Claimant’s claim pursuant to Section 9.1 within a reasonable time, but no later than ninety (90) days after receiving the claim. If the Committee determines that special circumstances require an extension of time for processing the claim, written notice of the extension shall be furnished to the Claimant prior to the termination of the initial ninety (90) day period. In no event shall such extension exceed a period of ninety (90) days from the end of the initial period. The extension notice shall indicate the special circumstances requiring an extension of time and the date by which the Committee expects to render the benefit determination. The Committee shall notify the Claimant in writing:

  • Failure to Reach Agreement If Company and Seller are unable to agree upon and execute a Performance Standards Revision Document within 180 Days of Company's written notice to Seller pursuant to Section 23.4 (Performance Standards Revision Document), Company shall have the option of declaring the failure to reach agreement on and execute such Performance Standards Revision Document to be a dispute and submit such dispute to an Independent Evaluator for the conduct of a determination pursuant to Section 23.10 (Dispute) of this Agreement. Any decision of the Independent Evaluator, rendered as a result of such dispute shall include a form of a Performance Standards Revision Document as described in Section 23.4 (Performance Standards Revision Document). PUC Performance Standards Revision Order. No Performance Standards Revision Document shall constitute an amendment to the Agreement unless and until a PUC Performance Standards Revision Order issued with respect to such Document has become non-appealable. Once the condition of the preceding sentence has been satisfied, such Performance Standards Revision Document shall constitute an amendment to this Agreement. To be "non-appealable" under this Section 23.6 (PUC Performance Standards Revision Order), such PUC Performance Standards Revision Order shall be either (i) not subject to appeal to any Circuit Court of the State of Hawai‘i or the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai‘i, because the thirty (30) Day period (accounting for weekends and holidays as appropriate) permitted for such an appeal has passed without the filing of notice of such an appeal, or (ii) affirmed on appeal to any Circuit Court of the State of Hawai‘i or the Supreme Court, or the Intermediate Appellate Court upon assignment by the Supreme Court, of the State of Hawai‘i, or affirmed upon further appeal or appellate process, and is not subject to further appeal, because the jurisdictional time permitted for such an appeal (and/or further appellate process such as a motion for reconsideration or an application for writ of certiorari) has passed without the filing of notice of such an appeal (or the filing for further appellate process).

  • EVENTS CONSTITUTING MATERIAL BREACH OF AGREEMENT The Applicant shall be in Material Breach of this Agreement if it commits one or more of the following acts or omissions (each a “Material Breach”):

  • Failure to Report No compensation shall be granted for the total period of standby if the employee is unable to report for duty when required.

  • Independence from Material Breach Determination Except as set forth in Section X.D.1.c, these provisions for payment of Stipulated Penalties shall not affect or otherwise set a standard for OIG’s decision that CHSI has materially breached this CIA, which decision shall be made at OIG’s discretion and shall be governed by the provisions in Section X.D, below.

  • Failure to Agree If the Contractor claims entitlement to a change in the Contract, and the Department does not agree that any action or event has occurred to justify any change in time or compensation, or if the parties fail to agree upon the appropriate amount of the adjustment in time or compensation, the Department will unilaterally make such changes, if any, to the Contract, as it determines are appropriate pursuant to the Contract. The Contractor shall proceed with the Work and the Department's directives, without interruption or delay, and shall make a claim as provided in Article 12. Failure to proceed due to a dispute over a change request shall constitute a material breach of the Contract and entitle the Department to all available remedies for such breach, including, without limitation, termination for default.

  • Failure to Remedy If the LHIN has provided the HSP with an opportunity to remedy the breach, and:

  • Failure to Designate a Board Member In the absence of any designation from the Persons or groups with the right to designate a director as specified above, the director previously designated by them and then serving shall be reelected if still eligible to serve as provided herein.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.