Evaluator and completes Final Written Evaluation Sample Clauses

Evaluator and completes Final Written Evaluation. At the conclusion of the yearly evaluation cycle, evaluation results shall be used by the employee’s evaluator, in accordance with RCW 28A.405.100, to judge the educator’s performance as distinguished, proficient, basic, or unsatisfactory. The overall score shall be derived by a calculation of all criterion scores and the student growth rubric scores to assess the educator’s student growth impact rating. Ratings shall be based upon the preponderance of evidence and its relationship to the state developed rubric. When there is an even number of components within a criterion, a split score, or evidence is unclear, the educator and evaluator may use one or more of the following to determine the criterion score: • Have further discussion about the specific components; or • Provide additional convincing evidence or artifacts, if relevant; or • Conduct additional observations if the criterion can be evaluated by observation.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluator and completes Final Written Evaluation. At the conclusion of the yearly evaluation cycle, evaluation results shall be used by the employee’s evaluator, in accordance with RCW 28A.405.100, to judge the educator’s performance as distinguished, proficient, basic, or unsatisfactory. The overall score shall be derived by a calculation of all criterion scores and the student growth rubric scores to assess the educator’s student growth impact rating. Ratings shall be based upon the preponderance of evidence and its relationship to the state developed rubric. When there is an even number of components within a criterion, a split score, or evidence is unclear, the educator and evaluator may use one or more of the following to determine the criterion score:  Have further discussion about the specific components; or  Provide additional convincing evidence or artifacts, if relevant; or  Conduct additional observations if the criterion can be evaluated by observation. Summative Rating Scoring- the sum of all eight criterion scores.  Unsatisfactory

Related to Evaluator and completes Final Written Evaluation

  • Independent Evaluation Buyer is an experienced and knowledgeable investor in the oil and gas business. Buyer has been advised by and has relied solely on its own expertise and legal, tax, title, reservoir engineering, environmental and other professional counsel concerning this transaction, the Properties, the value thereof and title thereto.

  • Written Evaluation The Superintendent in consultation with the Board shall review and assess the Administrator’s performance on or before February 1 of each year. The Administrator shall be formally evaluated in writing annually by the Superintendent on or before February 1 of each year. The evaluation shall include a description of the Administrator’s duties and responsibilities and the standards to which the Administrator is to perform. It shall consider the Administrator’s specific duties, responsibilities, management and competence as an Administrator; specify the Administrator’s strengths and weaknesses with supporting reasons; align with research based standards established by the Illinois State Board of Education and use data and indicators on student growth as a significant factor in rating performance. The evaluation shall also consist of a review of the Administrator’s progress toward meeting established professional, student performance and academic goals set forth in Appendix A and a review of the Administrator’s leadership and management performance relative to his current assignment. The written evaluation shall be signed by both the Superintendent and the Administrator. The Administrator may respond to the evaluation in writing and such response shall be attached to and included in the Administrator’s personnel file.

  • Evaluation of Contractor Performance of the Contractor under this Agreement will be evaluated. The evaluation shall be prepared on Contract/Contractor Evaluation Sheet (STD 4), and maintained in the Agreement file. For consultant agreements, a copy of the evaluation will be sent to the Department of General Services, Office of Legal Services, if it is negative and over $5,000.

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. Xxxxxxxxx & Xxxxxx will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting Evaluation A. The Project Implementing Entity shall monitor and evaluate the progress of its activities under the Project and prepare Project Reports in accordance with the provisions of Section 5.08(b) of the General Conditions and on the basis of indicators agreed with the Bank. Each such report shall cover the period of one

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.