Evaluation of HERMES-Coaching Seminar Sample Clauses

Evaluation of HERMES-Coaching Seminar. 3.1. Students’ feedback before - after HERMES Coaching seminar Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxx & Xxxxxxxxx Research questions The aim of the study was to find out how effective was a three day coaching seminar for driving teachers as evaluated by students and teachers.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation of HERMES-Coaching Seminar. 3.1. Students’ feedback before - after HERMES Coaching seminar Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxx & Xxxxxxxxx METHOD SUBJECTS Driving students In total 285 driving students took part in the study (table 1). They formed two groups according to when they participated. The ones who participated before the instructors’ three day coaching seminar served as subjects in the first measurement of this study. The ones who participated after the coaching seminar served as subjects in the second measurement of the study. Table 1. Measurement and the amount of subjects, age & gender Age* Gender** Measurement N M SD Mo Md Male Female 1. 158 21.31 7.14 18 19 76 80 2. 127 20.23 4.86 18 19 70 56 * 17 subjects did not give information about their age in both 1. and 2. measurement ** 2 subjects from the 1. measurement and 1 subject from the 2. measurement did not answer the question about their gender First measurement Driving students (N=158) ranging in age from 15 to 60 years (M=21.3, SD= 7.14) served as subjects in the first measurement of this study (table 1). The gender of the subjects was evenly distributed (male n=76 and female n=80). Male and female subjects had a similar educational background (Table 2). Most of them were employees or students in a school with a matura exam. Subjects completed the questionnaire mainly after a safe driving course (n=50) or a theory lesson (n=96) (table 3). Only five subjects completed it after a driving lesson and seven after a feedback drive. Second measurement 130 driving students took part in the second measurement of the study. Three of them answered the questionnaire without any inner variation and thus they were eliminated from the data. Therefore 127 driving students, 70 male and 56 female, served as subjects in the second measurement of the study (table 1). The age range was 16-48 years (M= 20.2, SD=4.86). The driving students were mostly employees, both male and female subjects (table 2). Most of the subjects completed the questionnaire after a theory lesson or a safe driving course (table 3).
Sample 1

Related to Evaluation of HERMES-Coaching Seminar

  • Evaluation of Teaching 1. All reports on a teacher shall be in writing.

  • Evaluation Cycle: Annual Orientation A) At the start of each school year, the superintendent, principal or designee shall conduct a meeting for Educators and Evaluators focused substantially on educator evaluation. The superintendent, principal or designee shall:

  • EVALUATION OF TEACHERS 1. All reports on the work of a teacher shall be in writing.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • DEVELOPMENT OR ASSISTANCE IN DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS/ STATEMENTS OF WORK Firms and/or individuals that assisted in the development or drafting of the specifications, requirements, statements of work, or solicitation documents contained herein are excluded from competing for this solicitation. This shall not be applicable to firms and/or individuals providing responses to a publicly posted Request for Information (RFI) associated with a solicitation.

  • Evaluation of Proposals 29.1 UNDP shall examine the Proposal to confirm that all terms and conditions under the UNDP General Terms and Conditions and Special Conditions have been accepted by the Proposer without any deviation or reservation.

  • Certification of Meeting or Exceeding Tobacco-Free Workplace Policy Minimum Standards A. Grantee certifies that it has adopted and enforces a Tobacco-Free Workplace Policy that meets or exceeds all of the following minimum standards of:

  • Review by the Association of Procurement Decisions The Procurement Plan shall set forth those contracts which shall be subject to the Association’s Prior Review. All other contracts shall be subject to Post Review by the Association.

  • Evaluation of Students Acknowledging the District’s adopted grading system, the teacher shall maintain the right and responsibility to determine grades and other evaluation of a student. No grade or evaluation shall be changed except by the teacher with the approval of the building administrator.

  • Certification for Federal-Aid Contracts Lobbying Activities A. The CONSULTANT certifies, by signing and submitting this Contract, to the best of its knowledge and belief after diligent inquiry, and other than as disclosed in writing to the LPA prior to or contemporaneously with the execution and delivery of this Contract by the CONSULTANT, the CONSULTANT has complied with Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code, and specifically, that:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.