Research Questions. This research addresses the following questions:
Research Questions. If applicable, the research question can be described in greater detail. ................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Prior knowledge Describe the prior knowledge required of the student. ................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................................................................................... ...................................................................................................................................................................
Research Questions. The research questions for the systematic review are:
Research Questions. This present study will use data collected from Tanzanian EFL learners who were enrolled in 3different levels of education. The data were scored by 2 raters who possessed different language backgrounds. The study addressed the following research questions:
Research Questions. The first group of research questions is hence related to the allocation and transfer of cases among hearing locations: - How are cases allocated to the various hearing locations within a judicial district? Is there a possibility for parties or for court managers to choose the hearing location for a case (within or outside the court district)? And if yes, to what extent and how is this process supported by ICT? The experiences and approaches of the reform efforts aimed at ensuring a balanced distribution of cases in Latvia will provide interesting perspectives on these issues.Not all court cases require judicial work. In some cases, what is really required are just the authority of the court and its capacity to issue enforceable decisions. It may be useful for Spain, while reorganising the work of all of its first instance courts, to consider the possibility to introduce, after looking at good practices, mechanisms that may take out from judges’ workload all repetitive cases with little or no judicial content. New working processes can be designed to automate as much as possible the treatment of these cases. Under certain circumstances, it may be convenient even to create an ad-hoc court, whose greater inflow of cases may both justify and simplify the adoption of more sophisticated technological solutions.
Research Questions. The need for this research has risen from a design rule as specified in Xxxxxxxx et al. (2010). In this research, a control framework for maintenance of spare parts is given for an environ- ment like that of NedTrain. In this framework, it is stipulated that the interface agreement between inventory control and a repair shop should be based on lead-times. At NedTrain, there is an R&D program that is dealing with maintenance development. Currently at Xxx- Train, a Min-max control mechanism is used. The steering committee of the maintenance development research program at NedTrain is wondering which interface agreement has a better performance under which conditions. One of the aims of this research is to com- pare both interface agreement with related different control mechanisms and decide which interface agreement holds promise for further implementation. Before the two interface agreements can be compared, for both agreements, close to op- timal values for the turn-around stock, minimum level or threshold has to be determined. This has to be done because otherwise the comparison is not fair. Obtaining the optimal configuration of the Min-max interface agreement is also very useful for NedTrain, because when doing this, it can be seen whether it is possible to improve the perfromance of the currently used Min-max interface agreement. This is the second aim of this research. These aims lead to the following research questions:
Research Questions. The demand for censoring or banning a publication with a religious subject can be based on different grounds: feeling of offense, hate, vilification, discrimination, or threat experienced by individuals belonging to the target religious groups, or the feeling of any disruption or interruption in the enjoyment of the constitutionally guaranteed freedom of religion; it can also occur when government on its own decides to prohibit certain types of speech on the pretext that such speech may hurt sentiments and pose a threat to public order (tools like censorship of books, banning of books under Customs Act etc.). In such controversies it becomes the responsibility of the state to balance contradictory claims and at the same time to ensure that the fundamental rights of citizens are protected. Further, any such case is open to scrutiny by the judiciary, whereby a rational assessment of the executive’s action and its legality is undertaken. The response, both from government and the judiciary, is largely based on their interpretations of the provisions laid down under the Constitution, as well as other legal resources. As legal scholars have pointed out, the executive often takes the easy course by either banning the publication or arresting the accused writer/publisher, citing the threat of public disorder.18 As a result, it falls upon the judiciary to play the role of defender of the right to freedom of speech and expression.
Research Questions. With respect to research question 1—What are appropriate success criteria to evaluate a high school–community college linkage program?—we must first identify the attributes of success criteria. First, the criteria must be actionable, in that they provide clear standards by which to judge the success or failure of the program. Second, the criteria must be grounded in data, and while not necessarily numerical, that data must be as objective as possible. Next, the criteria must also address affective dimensions, such as motivation, focus, and a sense of belonging. This condition opens the criteria to some level of subjectivity or bias, since affective variables are often self-reported and may be influenced by social desirability bias, whereby students report more positive results based on the desire for acceptance by peers or teachers (e.g., Xxxxxxxxxx, 2004; Xxxxxx, 2012). Finally, the success criteria must be specified in the articulation agreement, to ensure clarity for all stakeholders at both institutions. The success criteria used in the program described in this paper—namely, percentage of students who proceed to their second year in community college, and anecdotal reports of increased self esteem, self confidence, motivation, and greater focus in their studies—include several of these attributes. However, it is clear that the faculty and administrators involved in the program must value such success criteria, and that the latter should be explicitly included in the articulation agreement to enable objective evaluation of the program. Research question 2—What attributes of such a program promote or ensure sustainability?—is more problematic. The program described in this paper ultimately failed due to deficiencies in areas that could have enabled or supported sustainability, including: regular evaluation of the program using success criteria contained in the articulation agreement; a focus on data (including data beyond the first year of community college) and information that could be used to modify the program, such as reasons for student failure or withdrawal; active involvement of school administration at both institutions, and support by senior administrative personnel (e.g., superintendents of education, college vice presidents or deans); faculty liaisons or transfer champions (Xxxxx, 2016) to provide support to both faculty and students; ongoing curriculum alignment, pedagogical coordination, and interfaculty collaboration; and a xxxxxxxx xxxx ...
Research Questions. The research question that guides this study is the following: How do teachers in Kazakhstan understand ‘teacher autonomy’? Subsidiary Questions:
Research Questions. [Insert Research Questions]
