Compliance of the French Sample Clauses

Compliance of the French system with the RED I and RED II French deputies41 and senators attempted to go back on this rule during the debates on the Energy & Climate Law, but without success.42 According to their amendment, the remuneration related to guarantees of origin could how- ever be deducted from the amount of public subsidies received by producers. This would thus contribute to reducing the global amount of public subsidies granted, such subsidies being in the end borne by final customers. This proposed solution would be in accordance with EU law. RED I indeed laid down as a principle that producers shall not be compensated twice for the same production, but leaves it to Member States to decide the terms of application.43 While RED I only indicated that Member States may choose to decide not to issue guar- antees of origin to producers who already benefit from a support scheme and reciprocally (this is the case in France or in Germany), RED II is less restrictive and details the conditions under which GOs and support schemes can be cumulated. Pursuant to its Article 19.2, Member States shall ensure that when a producer received financial sup- port from a support scheme, the market value of the GO for the same production is taken into account appropri- ately in the support scheme the producer benefits from. It shall be presumed that this market value has been taken into account ‘appropriately’ in any of the following three cases: (1) where the financial support is granted by way of a tendering procedure; (2) where the market value of the guarantees of origin is administratively taken into account in the level of financial support; or (3) where the guaran- tees of origin are not issued directly to the producer but to a supplier or customer who buys the energy produced from renewable sources either in a competitive setting or under a PPA. The application of this last case is not clear in the French context where GOs are issued to producers who then can sell them to third-parties, notably under a PPA. But it may be just a terminology issue. In any case, the objective pursued by the directive is clearly to remove unjustified obstacles to the development of PPA and, through its Article 19.2, it sets the path for France to provide for an exemption to its non-cumulation principle, for GOs trade under a PPA.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Compliance of the French

  • Compliance Officer The Contractor shall employ a Compliance Officer who is accountable to the Contractor’s executive leadership and dedicated full-time to the Contractor’s Indiana Medicaid product lines. This individual will be the primary liaison with the State (or its designees) to facilitate communications between OMPP, the State’s contractors and the Contractor’s executive leadership and staff. This individual shall maintain a current knowledge of federal and state legislation, legislative initiatives and regulations that may impact the Hoosier Healthwise program. It is the responsibility of the Compliance Officer to coordinate reporting to the State as defined in Section 9 and to review the timeliness, accuracy and completeness of reports and data submissions to the State. The Compliance Officer, in close coordination with other key staff, has primary responsibility for ensuring all Contractor functions are in compliance with the terms of the Contract. The Compliance Officer shall meet with the OMPP Surveillance and Utilization Review Unit (SUR) on a quarterly basis.

  • Compliance Monitoring Grantee must be subject to compliance monitoring during the period of performance in which funds are Expended and up to three years following the closeout of all funds. In order to assure that the program can be adequately monitored, the following is required of Grantee:

  • Compliance Audit LEA shall have the right but shall be under no obligation to conduct audit(s), from time to time, of Provider’s records concerning its compliance obligations as set forth in this Article V. Provider shall make such records and other documents available to LEA upon request.

  • Compliance Requirements K. If using volunteers as provided for in this Contract during FY19, which encompasses the Contract term of July 1, 2019 to June 30, 2020, then the Grantee must either:

  • Compliance Plan (1) This paragraph (h) applies to any portion of the contract that—

  • ETHICS COMPLIANCE All Bidders/Contractors and their employees must comply with the requirements of Sections 73 and 74 of the Public Officers Law, other State codes, rules, regulations and executive orders establishing ethical standards for the conduct of business with New York State. In signing the Bid, Bidder certifies full compliance with those provisions for any present or future dealings, transactions, sales, contracts, services, offers, relationships, etc., involving New York State and/or its employees. Failure to comply with those provisions may result in disqualification from the Bidding process, termination of contract, and/or other civil or criminal proceedings as required by law.

  • CONTRACT COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT The HUB requirement on this Contract is 0%. The student engagement requirement of this Contract is 0 hours. The Career Education requirement for this Contract is 0 hours. Failure to achieve these requirements may result in the application of some or all of the sanctions set forth in Administrative Policy 3.10, which is hereby incorporated by reference.

  • Compliance Review During the Term, Developer agrees to permit the GLO, HUD, and/or a designated representative of the GLO or HUD to access the Property for the purpose of performing Compliance-Monitoring Procedures. In accordance with GLO Compliance-Monitoring Procedures, the GLO or HUD will periodically monitor and audit Developer’s compliance with the requirements of this Agreement, the CDBG-DR Regulations, the CDBG Multifamily Rental Housing Guidelines, and any and all other Governmental Requirements during the Term. In conducting any compliance reviews, the GLO or HUD will rely primarily on information obtained from Developer’s records and reports, on-site monitoring, and audit reports. The GLO or HUD may also consider other relevant information gained from other sources, including litigation and citizen complaints. Attachment G GLO Contract No. 19-097-041-B662 5.04 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: INDEMNIFICATION

  • DBE/HUB Compliance The Engineer’s subcontracting program shall comply with the requirements of Attachment H of the contract (DBE/HUB Requirements).

  • Compliance Verification (a) The subrecipient shall periodically interview a sufficient number of employees entitled to DB prevailing wages (covered employees) to verify that contractors or subcontractors are paying the appropriate wage rates. As provided in 29 CFR 5.6(a)(6), all interviews must be conducted in confidence. The subrecipient must use Standard Form 1445 (SF 1445) or equivalent documentation to memorialize the interviews. Copies of the SF 1445 are available from EPA on request.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.