Agreeing Final Commissioning Sample Clauses

Agreeing Final Commissioning. Programme Not less than [  ] months before the anticipated Certification Date, PPP Co. will provide the Authority’s Representative and the Independent Tester with a draft of the Final Commissioning Programme as developed by PPP Co. in accordance with the provisions of Clauses 12.2 (Standard of Final Commissioning Programme). The Authority’s Representative and the Independent Tester will provide PPP Co. with comments on the draft Final Commissioning Programme submitted to them no later than [  ] months after its receipt. The Parties and the Independent Tester will, within [  ] Business Days of receipt by PPP Co. of the Authority’s Representative’s and the Independent Tester’s comments agree the terms of the Final Commissioning Programme. If the Parties are unable to agree the Final Commissioning Programme the matter will be referred for determination in accordance with the Fast Track Procedure. If the Authority’s Representative and/or the Independent Tester do not issue comments within the required [  ] months period, the draft Final Commissioning Programme will be deemed to be accepted. Standard of Final Commissioning Programme The Final Commissioning Programme will be of a standard consistent with Good Industry Practice and will be consistent with the Tests on Completion. Commissioning Procedure PPP Co. will give to the Authority’s Representative and the Independent Tester [  ] Business Days’ notice in writing of the date when it will be ready to commence activities under the Final Commissioning Programme. The Authority’s Representative and the Independent Tester will be entitled to attend all such activities and PPP Co. will notify the Authority’s Representative of the time and place for the carrying out of such activities. On successful completion of the activities described in the Final Commissioning Programme, PPP Co. will supply the results of all of the relevant tests, commissioning and inspections to the Authority’s Representative and the Independent Tester. The Authority’s Representative and the Independent Tester will within [  ] Business Days of any inspection made pursuant to this Clause 12.3 (Commissioning Procedure) notify PPP Co. of any outstanding matters (including without limitation, the repetition of any activities which are required to be carried out and passed in accordance with the Final Commissioning Programme) which in the reasonable opinion of the Authority’s Representative and the Independent Tester are required to be attend...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Agreeing Final Commissioning. Programme Not less than [ • ] months before the anticipated Certification Date, PPP Co. will provide the Authority’s Representative and the Independent Tester with a draft of the Final Commissioning Programme as developed by PPP Co. in accordance with the provisions of Clauses 12.2 (Standard of Final Commissioning Programme). The Authority’s Representative and the Independent Tester will provide PPP Co. with comments on the draft Final Commissioning Programme submitted to them no later than [ • ] months after its receipt. The Parties and the Independent Tester will, within [ • ] Business Days of receipt by PPP Co. of the Authority’s Representative’s and the Independent Tester’s comments agree the terms of the Final Commissioning Programme. If the Parties are unable to agree the Final Commissioning Programme the matter will be referred for determination in accordance with the Fast Track Procedure. If the Authority’s Representative and/or the Independent Tester do not issue comments within the required [ • ] months period, the draft Final Commissioning Programme will be deemed to be accepted.
Sample 1

Related to Agreeing Final Commissioning

  • Agreement Review If, pursuant to section 25.10 (Review of Agreement) of the Bilateral Agreement, the Bilateral Agreement is reviewed after three or five years, or both, of the effective date of the Bilateral Agreement, and any changes to the Bilateral Agreement are required as a result, the Parties agree to amend the Agreement as necessary and in a manner that is consistent with such changes.

  • Design Professional Contract The Contract between the Owner and the Design Professional for the design of the Project.

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Contractor Certification regarding Boycotting Israel Pursuant to Chapter 2270, Texas Government Code, Contractor certifies Contractor (1) does not currently boycott Israel; and (2) will not boycott Israel during the Term of this Agreement. Contractor acknowledges this Agreement may be terminated and payment withheld if this certification is inaccurate.

  • Joint Review JADRC may, at the request of either party, review issues arising from the application of this Article.

  • Innovative Unit Scheduling Schedules other than those included in Articles 13.01 and 13.02 may be developed in order to improve quality of working life, support continuity of patient care, ensure adequate staffing resources, and support cost-efficiency. The parties agree that such innovative schedules may be determined locally by the Hospital and the Union subject to the following principles:

  • Order Coordination and Order Coordination-Time Specific 2.1.9.1 “Order Coordination” (OC) allows BellSouth and Global Connection to coordinate the installation of the SL2 Loops, Unbundled Digital Loops (UDL) and other Loops where OC may be purchased as an option, to Global Connection’s facilities to limit end user service outage. OC is available when the Loop is provisioned over an existing circuit that is currently providing service to the end user. OC for physical conversions will be scheduled at BellSouth’s discretion during normal working hours on the committed due date. OC shall be provided in accordance with the chart set forth below.

  • Transition Review Period In accordance with Article 35, Layoff and Recall, the Employer may require an employee to complete a transition review period.

  • Post Review With respect to each contract not governed by paragraph 2 of this Part, the procedures set forth in paragraph 4 of Appendix 1 to the Guidelines shall apply.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.