Validation results Sample Clauses

Validation results. The results of the comparison of the microscale modelling versus measurements are presented individually for each of the four areas.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Validation results external validator The external validator had to deal with the scenarios defined and see if the requirements were fulfilled by answering to questionnaires. Each scenario focuses on several requirements. There are no validation scores: a requirement is either fulfilled or not, according to a certain threshold. This threshold is on a binary scale (yes or no). The validation environment is that of PANACEA and any data can be used to carry out one scenario.
Sample 1
Validation results. 🞎 Green Checks – Your computer passes the minimum requirements to use the application. 🞎 Red Mark – Your computer fails the minimum requirements to use the application. Read and follow the instructions provided and then attempt validation again. ■ If Pop-ups are being blocked, go to the Internet Explorer Tools menu, click Internet Options. On the Privacy tab, click Enable Pop-ups. ■ If the validation again indicates pop-ups are not enabled, check for a pop-up blocker in a third-party toolbar such as Yahoo! or Google. To do this you may need to get tech support from the IT Department within your Organization. ■ For support in validating the workstation, contact the MI E-Grants System Administrator: Xxxxxx Xxxx 000-000-0000 XxxxX@xxxxxxxx.xxx Passed Note: Do NOT contact HTC or the DTMB Helpdesk with MI E-Grants issues. Failed Validate Workstation Validate Workstation cont’d
Sample 1

Related to Validation results

  • Evaluation Results A. Evaluation results shall be used:

  • Mediation Results Any agreements resulting from mediation shall be memorialized in writing. The results of the mediation shall not be final or binding unless otherwise agreed to in writing by the parties. Mediators shall not be subject to any subpoena or liability, and their actions shall not be subject to discovery.

  • Validation Review In the event OIG has reason to believe that: (a) Good Shepherd’s Claims Review fails to conform to the requirements of this CIA; or (b) the IRO’s findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate, OIG may, at its sole discretion, conduct its own review to determine whether the Claims Review complied with the requirements of the CIA and/or the findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate (Validation Review). Good Shepherd shall pay for the reasonable cost of any such review performed by OIG or any of its designated agents. Any Validation Review of Reports submitted as part of Good Shepherd’s final Annual Report shall be initiated no later than one year after Good Shepherd’s final submission (as described in Section II) is received by OIG. Prior to initiating a Validation Review, OIG shall notify Good Shepherd of its intent to do so and provide a written explanation of why OIG believes such a review is necessary. To resolve any concerns raised by OIG, Good Shepherd may request a meeting with OIG to: (a) discuss the results of any Claims Review submissions or findings; (b) present any additional information to clarify the results of the Claims Review or to correct the inaccuracy of the Claims Review; and/or (c) propose alternatives to the proposed Validation Review. Good Shepherd agrees to provide any additional information as may be requested by OIG under this Section III.D.3 in an expedited manner. OIG will attempt in good faith to resolve any Claims Review issues with Good Shepherd prior to conducting a Validation Review. However, the final determination as to whether or not to proceed with a Validation Review shall be made at the sole discretion of OIG.

  • Drug Test Results 1. All records pertaining to department-required drug tests shall remain confidential, and shall not be provided to other employers or agencies without the written permission of the person whose records are sought. However, medical, administrative, and immediate supervisory personnel may have access to relevant portions of the records as necessary to insure the acceptable performance of the officer's job duties.

  • Validation To validate the notice requirements outlined in Section 5.3, the Assuming Institution shall provide the Receiver (i) an Affidavit of Publication to meet the publication requirements outlined in Section 5.3(a) and (ii) the Assuming Institution will prepare an Affidavit of Mailing in a form substantially similar to Exhibit 2.3B after mailing the seven (7) day Notice to Depositors as required under Section 5.3(b).

  • Laboratory Testing All laboratories selected by UPS Freight for analyzing Controlled Substances Testing will be HHS certified.

  • Test Results The employer, upon request from an employee or former employee, will provide the confidential written report issued pursuant to 4.9 of the Canadian Model in respect to that employee or former employee.

  • Random Testing Notwithstanding any provisions of the Collective Agreement or any special agreements appended thereto, section 4.6 of the Canadian Model will not be applied by agreement. If applied to a worker dispatched by the Union, it will be applied or deemed to be applied unilaterally by the Employer. The Union retains the right to grieve the legality of any imposition of random testing in accordance with the Grievance Procedure set out in this Collective Agreement.

  • Protocols Each party hereby agrees that the inclusion of additional protocols may be required to make this Agreement specific. All such protocols shall be negotiated, determined and agreed upon by both parties hereto.

  • Study An application for leave of absence for professional study must be supported by a written statement indicating what study or research is to be undertaken, or, if applicable, what subjects are to be studied and at what institutions.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.