Using Staff feedback in Educator Evaluation Sample Clauses

Using Staff feedback in Educator Evaluation. ESE will provide model contract language, direction and guidance on using staff feedback in Administrator Evaluation by June 30, 2013. Upon receiving this model contract language, direction and guidance, the parties agree to bargain with respect to this matter.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Using Staff feedback in Educator Evaluation. DESE will provide model contract language, direction and guidance on using staff feedback in Administrator Evaluation by June 30, 2013. Upon receiving this model contract language, direction and guidance, the parties agree to bargain to the extent required by law with respect to this matter.
Using Staff feedback in Educator Evaluation. DESE will provide model contract language, direction and guidance on using staff feedback in Administrator Evaluation. The parties agree to bargain with respect to this matter.
Using Staff feedback in Educator Evaluation. All educators assigned to a school building will complete the relevant LPS Administrator Survey for the principals and assistant principals in their building by the first Friday in April each year. The administrator will use these survey results to inform the conversation with the Superintendent at the summative evaluation meeting by the first Friday in July.
Using Staff feedback in Educator Evaluation. Following receipt of guidance from ESE, the parties will negotiate over using staff feedback in Administrator Evaluation.
Using Staff feedback in Educator Evaluation a. The parties agree to bargain with respect to this matter once the DESE has finalized this process and provided guidance to school districts.
Using Staff feedback in Educator Evaluation. Following receipt of guidance from ESE, the parties will negotiate over using staff feedback in Administrator Evaluation.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Using Staff feedback in Educator Evaluation

  • Using Student feedback in Educator Evaluation ESE will provide model contract language, direction and guidance on using student feedback in Educator Evaluation by June 30, 2013. Upon receiving this model contract language, direction and guidance, the parties agree to bargain with respect to this matter.

  • Program Monitoring and Evaluation (c) The Recipient shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and furnish to the Association not later than six months after the Closing Date, a report of such scope and in such detail as the Association shall reasonably request, on the execution of the Program, the performance by the Recipient and the Association of their respective obligations under the Legal Agreements and the accomplishment of the purposes of the Financing.”

  • Purpose of Educator Evaluation A) This contract language is locally negotiated and based on M.G.L., c.71, § 38; M.G.L. c.150E; the Educator Evaluation regulations, 603 CMR 35.00 et seq.; and the Model System for Educator Evaluation developed and which may be updated from time to time by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. See 603 CMR 35.02 (definition of model system). In the event of a conflict between this collective bargaining agreement and the governing laws and regulations, the laws and regulations will prevail.

  • EMPLOYEE EVALUATION 14.1 The purpose of employee evaluation is to support decisions concerning employee discipline, promotion and improvement. Evaluation shall be the responsibility of the immediate supervisor who shall not be a member of the bargaining unit.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!