Table 7a - Statistical targets and milestones Sample Clauses

Table 7a - Statistical targets and milestones relating to your applicants, entrants or student body Reference number Please select target type from the drop-down menu Description (500 characters maximum) Is this a collaborative target? Baseline year Baseline data Yearly milestones (numeric where possible, however you may use text) Commentary on your milestones/targets or textual description where numerical description is not appropriate (500 characters maximum) T16a_10 HESA T1c - Low participation neighbourhoods (POLAR3) (Young, full-time, other undergraduate entrants) No T16a_11 HESA T1a - State School (Young, full-time, first degree entrants) No T16a_12 HESA T1a - State School (Young, full-time, first degree entrants) Work with REACH and NECOM Partnerships to both deliver and participate in College Based HE progression targetted activities at 6th Forms Colleges and School leavers. Yes 2014-15 1 2 4 5 5 6 In planning these, we recognise that the targets might be adjusted as the HEFCE funding for the networks ends in 2 years. T16a_13 Other statistic - Gender (please give details in the next column) Promote and increase at Loughborough College the numbers of women takin technology programmes at HE levels from the current baseline Yes 2014-15 1 10 20 30 35 45 The figures represent actual numbers taking a FT or PT programme including HND/D, FD and Degree top up. T16a_14 HESA T1a - State School (Young, full-time, first degree entrants) Increase the numbers of students progressing from Level 3 FE into Loughborough College Higher Education No 2013-14 2 6% 10% 15% 22% 25% This target is in effect one element of the overall target in our agreement to grow internal progression from the low level of sub 8% in 13/14. T16a_15 HESA T2c - Low participation neighbourhoods (POLAR2) (Mature, full-time, other undergraduate entrants) Increase the number of mature students progressing from Level 3 FE to Loughborough College Higher Education No 2013-14 5.5% 7% 8% 10% 12% 13% This target is in effect one element of the overall target in our agreement to grow internal progression from the low level of sub 8% in 13/14.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Table 7a - Statistical targets and milestones relating to your applicants, entrants or student body Target type Description Baseline year Baseline data Yearly milestones
Sample 1
Table 7a - Statistical targets and milestones relating to your applicants, entrants or student body Reference number Please select target type from the drop-down menu Description (500 characters maximum) Is this a collaborative target? Baseline year Baseline data Yearly milestones (numeric where possible, however you may use text) Commentary on your milestones/targets or textual description where numerical description is not appropriate (500 characters maximum) T16a_01 HESA T1a - State School (Young, full-time, first degree entrants) Young degree entrants No 2011-12 90.1% 91.4% 91.4% 91.4% 91.4% 91.4% T16a_02 HESA T1a - NS-SEC classes 4-7 (Young, full-time, first degree entrants) Young degree entrants No 2013-14 25.2% 27% 28% 28.3% 28.6% 28.9% T16a_03 HESA T1a - Low participation neighbourhoods (POLAR2) (Young, full-time, first degree entrants) Young degree entrants No 2013-14 9.8% 11.5% 12% 12.3% 12.6% 12.9% T16a_04 HESA T3b - No longer in HE after 1 year & in low participation neighbourhoods (POLAR 2) (Young, full-time, first degree entrants) Young degree entrants No 2013-14 6.1% 5.2% 5% 4.8% 4.6% 4.4% Notes Alongside applicant and entrant targets, we encourage you to provide targets around outreach and student success work (including collaborative work where appropriate) or other initiatives to illustrate your progress towards increasing access, student success and progression. These should be measurable outcomes ‐based targets and should focus on the number of beneficiaries reached by a particular activity/programme or the number of schools worked with, and what the outcomes were, rather than simply recording the nature/number of activities.
Sample 1

Related to Table 7a - Statistical targets and milestones

  • Targets and Milestones Comparing the relative performance of different groups to the over or under- representation within the institution and taking into account our current performance in our Access Agreement milestones, areas for particular focus include: Low Participating Neighbourhoods; Low income groups; Target groups to include gender, disability and care leavers; Black and minority ethnic (BME) group attainment; Completion rates. As a result of the analysis of our performances, our access, success and progression interventions will concentrate on the following: Continuation of involvement in collaborative outreach activity via the KMPF and the Kent and Medway Collaborative Network (KMCNet) as part of the National Network for Collaborative Outreach (NNCO); Recognition of the importance of carefully targeted activity; The use of serial rather than one-off interventions; The importance of long-term outreach to include the whole student lifecycle; The helpfulness of Higher Education Access Tracker (HEAT) for evaluating the impact of interventions; The importance of a whole institution approach; The importance of student attendance monitoring; Ease of access to information and student welfare support; An increasing emphasis on evaluation of activities across the student lifecycle; Accessibility of employability advice and support. Given our relatively strong record to date for widening access and student success, most of the targets seek to maintain, and where possible improve, this performance within a more challenging financial environment. Such targets may be especially challenging and stretching in relation to the access of those from Low Participating Neighbourhoods (LPNs), given the demographic decline in the number of young people (aged 18-21) in the population and the University’s already high recruitment levels from these groups. We have removed the University’s NS-SEC target in response to the UK Performance Indicator Steering Group announcement that HESA will no longer be publishing the NS-SEC indicator after 2016. As we already have LPN and Household Income targets in place we shall not be replacing this target with an alternative. We have reviewed our success targets and added new progression targets for 2017. There was a concern in the institution that our internal reporting did not allow for national and regionally adjusted benchmark comparison. We have therefore made the following adjustments to our success targets: Non-continuation two years following year of entry: part-time first degree entrants – all entrants: Replacing the OFFA agreement target with the similar data from HESA allows for national benchmarking to be undertaken in order to ensure that the University is maintaining its commitment to these students. We aim to keep our non-continuation rate in this area below our HESA benchmark rate. Non-continuation following year of entry: UK domiciled full-time first degree entrants – mature entrants: Changing the target to clearly focus on mature full-time first degree students (to match the national HESA data) ensures that we focus our efforts on this section of the student population and for the outcomes to be compared with HESA benchmarks rather than internally produced data. We aim to ensure that this student population’s non-continuation rate is at or below the HESA benchmark rate by 2020/21. Non-continuation following year of entry: UK domiciled full-time first degree entrants – all entrants: In order to ensure that young students are not disadvantaged by the focus on mature entrants, the University will also commit to maintaining the overall non-continuation rate for all students at or below the HESA benchmark. BME: the University will replace the current phrasing of the target around BME success with a more explicit aim of reducing the success gap experienced by BME students. Progression: the University has added a progression target that aims to keep us around or above the sector benchmark for the Employment Indicator from the DLHE survey. Combined targets from the collaborative KMPF project (agreed by all partners) are to raise applications and subsequent conversions to higher education from within the target schools and colleges in LPNs. These targets will need to be reviewed in the coming years to reflect changes to GCSE grading in schools. Our institutional and collaborative targets are included in tables 7a and 7b respectively.

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Development Milestones In addition to its obligations under Paragraph 7.1, LICENSEE specifically commits to achieving the following development milestones in its diligence activities under this AGREEMENT: (a) (b).

  • Measuring EPP parameters Every 5 minutes, EPP probes will select one “IP address” of the EPP servers of the TLD being monitored and make an “EPP test”; every time they should alternate between the 3 different types of commands and between the commands inside each category. If an “EPP test” result is undefined/unanswered, the EPP service will be considered as unavailable from that probe until it is time to make a new test.

  • Project/Milestones Taxpayer is a developer, manufacturer, and distributor of dental products for dental laboratories. In consideration for the Credit, Taxpayer agrees to hire full time employees and invest in computer and manufacturing equipment, tenant improvements, software licenses, and furniture and fixtures as part of its expansion in San Diego, California (collectively, the “Project”). Further, Taxpayer agrees to satisfy the milestones as described in Exhibit A (“Milestones”) and must maintain Milestones for a minimum of three (3) taxable years thereafter. In the event Taxpayer employs more than the number of full-time employees, determined on an annual full-time equivalent basis, than required in Exhibit A, for purposes of satisfying the “Minimum Annual Salary of California Full-time Employees Hired” and the “Cumulative Average Annual Salary of California Full-time Employees Hired,” Taxpayer may use the salaries of any of the full-time employees hired within the required time period. For purposes of calculating the “Minimum Annual Salary of California Full-time Employees Hired” and the “Cumulative Average Annual Salary of California Full-time Employees Hired,” the salary of any full-time employee that is not employed by Taxpayer for the entire taxable year shall be annualized. In addition, the salary of any full-time employee hired to fill a vacated position in which a full-time employee was employed during Taxpayer’s Base Year shall be disregarded.

  • Sales Milestones On a Co-Co Product-by-Co-Co Product basis, Celgene shall make the following sales milestone payments to Jounce that are set forth below upon the first achievement by or on behalf of Celgene, its Affiliates or Sublicensees of the sales milestone events (“Sales Milestone Events”) set forth below with respect to sales of such Co-Co Product in the ROW Territory. Sales Milestone Event (Per Co-Co Product, ROW (i.e., ex-U.S.)) Milestone Payments (in $ millions) [***] [***] [***] [***] [***] [***]

  • Target Population The Grantee shall ensure that diversion programs and services provided under this grant are designed to serve juvenile offenders who are at risk of commitment to Department.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.