Common use of STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Clause in Contracts

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. [This section shall apply when the Effective Date is on or after July 1, 2009 and the maximum amount payable to Contractor hereunder is $100,000 or higher] By entering into this Contract, Contractor agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state contracts and inclusion of contract performance information in a statewide contract management system. Contractor’s performance shall be evaluated in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Contract, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation of Contractor’s performance shall be part of the normal contract administration process and Contractor’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of Contractor’s obligations under this Contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of the Statement of Project of this Contract. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established in the Statement of Project and a final review and rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Contract term. Contractor shall be notified following each performance and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance evaluation determine that Contractor demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established under the Statement of Project, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment and showing of good cause, may debar Contractor and prohibit Contractor from bidding on future contracts. Contractor may contest the final evaluation and result by: (i) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (ii) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Contractor, by the Executive Director, upon showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. [This section shall apply when the Effective Date is on or after July 1, 2009 and If the maximum amount payable to Contractor hereunder Grantee under this Grant is $100,000 or higher] By entering into greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this Contract, Contractor §19 applies. Grantee agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §0024-000-000103- 601, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state contracts Grants and inclusion of contract Grant performance information in a statewide contract management systemContract Management System. ContractorXxxxxxx’s performance shall be evaluated subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this ContractGrant, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of ContractorXxxxxxx’s performance shall be part of the normal contract Grant administration process and ContractorXxxxxxx’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of review Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of ContractorXxxxxxx’s obligations under this Contract Grant shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of the Statement of Project of this ContractGrantee’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established in the Statement of Project herein and a final review Evaluation, Review and rating Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Contract Grant term. Contractor Grantee shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance evaluation Evaluation and Review determine that Contractor Xxxxxxx demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established under the Statement of Projecthereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment CDOT and showing of good cause, may debar Contractor xxxxx Xxxxxxx and prohibit Contractor Grantee from bidding on future contractsGrants. Contractor Grantee may contest the final evaluation Evaluation, Review and result Rating by: (ia) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (iib) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of ContractorGrantee, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. [This section shall apply when the Effective Date is on or after July 1, 2009 and If the maximum amount payable to Contractor hereunder Grantee under this Grant is greater than $100,000 either on the Effective Date or higher] By entering into at anytime thereafter, this Contract, Contractor §19 applies. Grantee agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state contracts Grants and inclusion of contract Grant performance information in a statewide contract management systemContract Management System. ContractorXxxxxxx’s performance shall be evaluated subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this ContractGrant, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of ContractorXxxxxxx’s performance shall be part of the normal contract Grant administration process and ContractorXxxxxxx’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of review Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of ContractorXxxxxxx’s obligations under this Contract Grant shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of the Statement of Project of this ContractGrantee’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established in the Statement of Project herein and a final review Evaluation, Review and rating Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Contract Grant term. Contractor Grantee shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance evaluation Evaluation and Review determine that Contractor Xxxxxxx demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established under the Statement of Projecthereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Local Affairs, and showing of good cause, may debar Contractor xxxxx Xxxxxxx and prohibit Contractor Grantee from receiving future grants and bidding on future contracts. Contractor Grantee may contest the final evaluation Evaluation, Review and result Rating by: (ia) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (iib) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of ContractorGrantee, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. [This section shall apply when the Effective Date is on or after July 1, 2009 and If the maximum amount payable to Contractor hereunder Consultant under this Contract is $100,000 or higher] By entering into greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this Contract, Contractor section shall apply. Consultant agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §24-103.5-101 101, 00-000-000, and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state contracts and inclusion of contract performance information in a statewide contract management system. ContractorConsultant’s performance shall be evaluated subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Contract, State law, including CRS §C.R.S 24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of ContractorConsultant’s performance shall be part of the normal contract administration process and ContractorConsultant’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of review Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of ContractorConsultant’s obligations under this Contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of the Statement of Project of this ContractConsultant’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established in the Statement of Project herein and a final review Evaluation, Review and rating Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Contract term. Contractor Consultant shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance evaluation Evaluation and Review determine that Contractor Consultant demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established under the Statement of Projecthereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Principal Representative, and showing of good cause, may debar Contractor Consultant and prohibit Contractor Consultant from bidding on future contracts. Contractor Consultant may contest the final evaluation Evaluation, Review and result Rating by: (ia) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (iib) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of ContractorConsultant, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. [This section shall apply when the Effective Date is on or after July 1, 2009 and If the maximum amount payable to Contractor hereunder under this Contract is $100,000 or higher] By entering into greater, either on the Effective Date or at any time thereafter, this Contract, §Statewide Contract Management System applies. Contractor agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state contracts and inclusion of contract performance information in a statewide contract management system. Contractor’s performance shall be evaluated subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Contract, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of Contractor’s performance shall be part of the normal contract administration process and Contractor’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of review Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of Contractor’s obligations under this Contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of the Statement of Project of this ContractContractor’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established in the Statement of Project herein and a final review Evaluation, Review and rating Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Contract term. Contractor shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance evaluation Evaluation and Review determine that Contractor demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established under the Statement of Projecthereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Transportation and showing of good cause, may debar Contractor and prohibit Contractor from bidding on future contracts. Contractor may contest the final evaluation Evaluation, Review and result Rating by: (ia) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (iib) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Contractor, by the Executive Director, upon showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. [This section shall apply when the Effective Date is on or after July 1, 2009 and If the maximum amount payable to Contractor hereunder under this Contract is $100,000 or higher] By entering into greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this Contract, §J applies. Contractor agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §0024-000-000102- 206, §00-000-000, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state contracts and inclusion of contract performance information in a statewide contract management system. Contractor’s performance shall be evaluated subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Contract, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of Contractor’s performance shall be part of the normal contract administration process and Contractor’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of review Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of Contractor’s obligations under this Contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of the Statement of Project of this ContractContractor’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established in the Statement of Project herein and a final review Evaluation, Review and rating Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Contract term. Contractor shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance evaluation Evaluation and Review determine that Contractor demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established under the Statement of Projecthereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Transportation, and showing of good cause, may debar Contractor and prohibit Contractor from bidding on future contracts. Contractor may contest the final evaluation Evaluation, Review and result Rating by: (ia) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (iib) under CRS §24-105-105- 102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Contractor, by the Executive Director, upon showing of good cause.. G:\DENLAW\XXXXX XXXXX\OPEN\SH-120 Xxxxxxxx\18370 - CDOT UPRR- SH 120 Bridge Replacement MLF 10May2013.docx THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE EXECUTED THIS CONTRACT UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY By STATE OF COLORADO XXXX X. XXXXXXXXXXXX, GOVERNOR By Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxx, P.E. Chief Engineer APPROVED: XXXX X. XXXXXXX, Attorney General By Xxxxxxx Xxxxx, Asst. Attorney General CRS 00-00-000 requires that the State Controller approve all state contracts. This Contract is not valid until the State Controller, or such assistant as he may delegate, has signed it. Except for preliminary engineering review performed by the Railroad or a Railroad contractor as set forth in this Contract, the Railroad is not authorized to begin performance until the Contract is signed and dated below. Except for preliminary engineering review performed by the Railroad or a Railroad contractor as set forth in this Contract, if performance begins prior to the date below, the State may not be obligated to pay for goods and/or services provided. State Controller Xxxxxx Xxxxx, CPA, MBA, JD By CDOT Controller

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. [This section shall apply when the Effective Date is on or after July 1, 2009 and If the maximum amount payable to Contractor hereunder under this Contract is $100,000 or higher] By entering into greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this Contract, §19 applies. Contractor agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §00-00- 000-000, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state contracts and inclusion of contract performance information in a statewide contract management system. Contractor’s performance shall be evaluated subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Contract, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of Contractor’s performance shall be part of the normal contract administration process and Contractor’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of review Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of Contractor’s obligations under this Contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of the Statement of Project of this ContractContractor’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established in the Statement of Project herein and a final review Evaluation, Review and rating Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Contract term. Contractor shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance evaluation Evaluation and Review determine that Contractor demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established under the Statement of Projecthereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Revenue, and showing of good cause, may debar Contractor and prohibit Contractor from bidding on future contracts. Contractor may contest the final evaluation Evaluation, Review and result Rating by: (ia) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-105- 102(6)), or (iib) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Contractor, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. [This section shall apply when the Effective Date is on or after July 1, 2009 and If the maximum amount payable to Contractor hereunder under this Contract is $100,000 or higher] By entering into greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this Contract, §19 applies. Contractor agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state contracts and inclusion of contract performance information in a statewide contract management systemContract Management System. Contractor’s performance shall be evaluated subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Contract, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of Contractor’s performance shall be part of the normal contract administration process and Contractor’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of review Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of Contractor’s obligations under this Contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of the Statement of Project of this ContractContractor’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established in the Statement of Project herein and a final review Evaluation, Review and rating Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Contract term. Contractor shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance evaluation Evaluation and Review determine that Contractor demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established under the Statement of Projecthereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment CDOT, and showing of good cause, may debar Contractor and prohibit Contractor from bidding on future contracts. Contractor may contest the final evaluation Evaluation, Review and result Rating by: (ia) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (iib) under CRS §24-105-105- 102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Contractor, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. [This section shall apply when the Effective Date is on or after July 1, 2009 and If the maximum amount payable to Contractor hereunder Grantee under this Grant is $100,000 or higher] By entering into greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this Contract, Contractor §19 applies. Grantee agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state contracts Grants and inclusion of contract Grant performance information in a statewide contract management systemContract Management System. ContractorXxxxxxx’s performance shall be evaluated subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this ContractGrant, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of ContractorXxxxxxx’s performance shall be part of the normal contract Grant administration process and ContractorXxxxxxx’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of review Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of ContractorXxxxxxx’s obligations under this Contract Grant shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of the Statement of Project of this ContractGrantee’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established in the Statement of Project herein and a final review Evaluation, Review and rating Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Contract Grant term. Contractor Grantee shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance evaluation Evaluation and Review determine that Contractor Xxxxxxx demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established under the Statement of Projecthereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by the Colorado Department Division of Public Health Homeland Security and Environment Emergency Management, and showing of good cause, may debar Contractor xxxxx Xxxxxxx and prohibit Contractor Grantee from bidding on future contractsGrants. Contractor Grantee may contest the final evaluation Evaluation, Review and result Rating by: (ia) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (iib) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of ContractorGrantee, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. [This section shall apply when the Effective Date is on or after July 1, 2009 and If the maximum amount payable to Contractor hereunder Grantee under this Grant is greater than $100,000 either on the Effective Date or higher] By entering into at anytime thereafter, this Contract, Contractor §19 applies. Grantee agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §0024- 103-000-000601, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state contracts Grants and inclusion of contract Grant performance information in a statewide contract management systemContract Management System. ContractorGrantee’s performance shall be evaluated subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this ContractGrant, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of ContractorGrantee’s performance shall be part of the normal contract Grant administration process and ContractorGrantee’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of review Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of ContractorGrantee’s obligations under this Contract Grant shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of the Statement of Project of this ContractGrantee’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established in the Statement of Project herein and a final review Evaluation, Review and rating Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Contract Grant term. Contractor Grantee shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance evaluation Evaluation and Review determine that Contractor Grantee demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established under the Statement of Projecthereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Local Affairs, and showing of good cause, may debar Contractor Grantee and prohibit Contractor Grantee from receiving future grants and bidding on future contracts. Contractor Grantee may contest the final evaluation Evaluation, Review and result Rating by: (ia) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-105- 102(6)), or (iib) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of ContractorGrantee, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. [This section shall apply when the Effective Date is on or after July 1, 2009 and If the maximum amount payable to Contractor hereunder Grantee under this Grant is greater than $100,000 either on the Effective Date or higher] By entering into at anytime thereafter, this Contract, Contractor §19 applies. Grantee agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state contracts Grants and inclusion of contract Grant performance information in a statewide contract management systemContract Management System. ContractorGrantee’s performance shall be evaluated subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this ContractGrant, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of ContractorGrantee’s performance shall be part of the normal contract Grant administration process and ContractorGrantee’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of review Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of ContractorGrantee’s obligations under this Contract Grant shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of the Statement of Project of this ContractGrantee’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established in the Statement of Project herein and a final review Evaluation, Review and rating Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Contract Grant term. Contractor Grantee shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance evaluation Evaluation and Review determine that Contractor Grantee demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established under the Statement of Projecthereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Local Affairs, and showing of good cause, may debar Contractor Grantee and prohibit Contractor Grantee from receiving future grants and bidding on future contracts. Contractor Grantee may contest the final evaluation Evaluation, Review and result Rating by: (ia) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (iib) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of ContractorGrantee, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. [This section shall apply when the Effective Date is on or after July 1, 2009 and If the maximum amount payable to Contractor hereunder under this Contract is $100,000 or higher] By entering into greater, either on the Effective Date or at any time thereafter, this Contract, §Statewide Contract Management System applies. Contractor agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state contracts and inclusion of contract performance information in a statewide contract management system. Contractor’s performance shall be evaluated subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Contract, State law, including CRS §2400-103.5000-101000, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of Contractor’s performance shall be part of the normal contract administration process and Contractor’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of review Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of Contractor’s obligations under this Contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of the Statement of Project of this ContractContractor’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established in the Statement of Project herein and a final review Evaluation, Review and rating Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Contract term. Contractor shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance evaluation Evaluation and Review determine that Contractor demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established under the Statement of Projecthereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Transportation and showing of good cause, may debar Contractor and prohibit Contractor from bidding on future contracts. Contractor may contest the final evaluation Evaluation, Review and result Rating by: (ia) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (iib) under CRS §24-105-102(6), by exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 201, 202, or 202204, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Contractor, by the Executive Director, upon showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. [This section shall apply when the Effective Date is on or after July 1, 2009 and ‌ If the maximum amount payable to Contractor hereunder Grantee under this Subgrant is $100,000 or higher] By entering into greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this Contract, Contractor §19 applies. Grantee agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §0024-000-000103- 601, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state contracts Grants and inclusion of contract Subgrant performance information in a statewide contract management system. ContractorXxxxxxx’s performance shall be evaluated subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this ContractGrant, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of ContractorXxxxxxx’s performance shall be part of the normal contract Subgrant administration process and ContractorXxxxxxx’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract contract Management System. Areas of review Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of ContractorGrantee’s obligations under this Contract Subgrant shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of the Statement of Project of this ContractGrantee’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract contract Management System at intervals established in the Statement of Project herein and a final review Evaluation, Review and rating Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Contract Subgrant term. Contractor Grantee shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance evaluation Evaluation and Review determine that Contractor Xxxxxxx demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established under the Statement of Projecthereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and & Administration (Executive Director), upon request by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment DNR, and showing of good cause, may debar Contractor xxxxx Xxxxxxx and prohibit Contractor Grantee from bidding on future contractsGrants. Contractor Grantee may contest the final evaluation Evaluation, Review and result Rating by: (ia) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (iib) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of ContractorGrantee, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. [This section shall apply when the Effective Date is on or after July 1, 2009 and If the maximum amount payable to Contractor hereunder by State Ordering Entities under this Price Agreement is $100,000 or higher] By entering into greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this Contract, §19 applies. Contractor agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §0024-000-000103- 601, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state contracts and inclusion of contract performance information in a statewide contract management system. Contractor’s performance shall be evaluated subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this ContractPrice Agreement, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of Contractor’s performance shall be part of the normal contract administration process and Contractor’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of review Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of Contractor’s obligations under this Contract Price Agreement shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of the Statement of Project of this ContractContractor’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established in the Statement of Project by State Ordering Entities and a final review Evaluation, Review and rating Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Contract Price Agreement term. Contractor shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance evaluation Evaluation and Review determine that Contractor demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established under the Statement of Projecthereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment State Purchasing Office, and showing of good cause, may debar Contractor and prohibit Contractor from bidding on future contracts. Contractor may contest the final evaluation Evaluation, Review and result Rating by: (ia) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (iib) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Contractor, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. [This section shall apply when the Effective Date is on or after July 1, 2009 and If the maximum amount payable to Contractor hereunder under this Contract is $100,000 or higher] By entering into greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this Contract, §19 applies. Contractor agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §0024-000-000103- 601, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state contracts and inclusion of contract performance information in a statewide contract management system. Contractor’s performance shall be evaluated subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Contract, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of Contractor’s performance shall be part of the normal contract administration process and Contractor’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of review Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of Contractor’s obligations under this Contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of the Statement of Project of this ContractContractor’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established in the Statement of Project herein and a final review Evaluation, Review and rating Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Contract term. Contractor shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance evaluation Evaluation and Review determine that Contractor demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established under the Statement of Projecthereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment State Purchasing Office, and showing of good cause, may debar Contractor and prohibit Contractor from bidding on future contracts. Contractor may contest the final evaluation Evaluation, Review and result Rating by: (ia) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (iib) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Contractor, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. [This section shall apply when the Effective Date is on or after July 1, 2009 and If the maximum amount payable to Contractor hereunder Borrower under this Loan Agreement is greater than $100,000 100,000, either on the Effective Date or higher] By entering into at anytime thereafter, this Contract, Contractor §19 applies. Borrower agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §0024-000-000103- 601, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state contracts Loans and inclusion of contract Loan Agreement performance information in a statewide contract management systemContract Management System. ContractorBorrower’s performance shall may be evaluated subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this ContractLoan Agreement, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of ContractorBorrower’s performance shall be part of the normal contract Loan Agreement administration process and ContractorBorrower’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of review Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of ContractorBorrower’s obligations under this Contract Loan Agreement shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of the Statement of Project of this ContractBorrower’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established in the Statement of Project herein and a final review Evaluation, Review and rating Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Contract Loan Agreement term. Contractor Borrower shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance evaluation Evaluation and Review determine that Contractor Borrower demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established under the Statement of Projecthereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Energy Office, and showing of good cause, may debar Contractor Borrower and prohibit Contractor Borrower from receiving future grants and bidding on future contracts. Contractor Borrower may contest the final evaluation Evaluation, Review and result Rating by: (ia) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (iib) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of ContractorBorrower, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. [This section shall apply when the Effective Date is on or after July 1, 2009 and If the maximum amount payable to Contractor hereunder under this Contract is $100,000 or higher] By entering into greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this Contract, §Statewide Contract Management System applies. Contractor agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state contracts and inclusion of contract performance information in a statewide contract management system. Contractor’s performance shall be evaluated subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Contract, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of Contractor’s performance shall be part of the normal contract administration process and Contractor’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of review Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of Contractor’s obligations under this Contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of the Statement of Project of this ContractContractor’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established in the Statement of Project herein and a final review Evaluation, Review and rating Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Contract term. Contractor shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance evaluation Evaluation and Review determine that Contractor demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established under the Statement of Projecthereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Transportation and showing of good cause, may debar Contractor and prohibit Contractor from bidding on future contracts. Contractor may contest the final evaluation Evaluation, Review and result Rating by: (ia) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (iib) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Contractor, by the Executive Director, upon showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. [This section shall apply when the Effective Date is on or after July 1, 2009 and ‌‌ If the maximum amount payable to Contractor hereunder Grantee under this Grant is $100,000 or higher] By entering into greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this Contract, Contractor §18 applies. Grantee agrees to be governed, and to abide, by comply with the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §24-24- 103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state contracts Grants and inclusion of contract Grant performance information in a statewide contract management system. ContractorThe State is required to conduct Evaluation and Review of Xxxxxxx’s performance shall be evaluated in accordance with the terms and conditions of this ContractGrant, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of ContractorXxxxxxx’s performance shall be part of the normal contract Grant administration process and ContractorXxxxxxx’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of review Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of ContractorXxxxxxx’s obligations under this Contract Grant shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of the Statement of Project of this ContractGrantee’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established in the Statement of Project herein and a final review Evaluation, Review and rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Contract Grant term. Contractor Grantee shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance evaluation Evaluation and Review determine that Contractor Xxxxxxx demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established under the Statement of Projecthereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and & Administration (Executive Director), upon request by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment HC, and showing of good cause, may debar Contractor xxxxx Xxxxxxx and prohibit Contractor Grantee from bidding on future contractsGrants. Contractor Grantee may contest the final evaluation Evaluation, Review and result rating by: (ia) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (iib) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of ContractorGrantee, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. [This section shall apply when the Effective Date is on or after July 1, 2009 and If the maximum amount payable to Contractor hereunder Grantee under this Grant is $100,000 or higher] By entering into greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this Contract, Contractor §19 applies. Grantee agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state contracts Grants and inclusion of contract Grant performance information in a statewide contract management systemContract Management System (CMS). ContractorXxxxxxx’s performance shall be evaluated subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this ContractGrant, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of ContractorXxxxxxx’s performance shall be part of the normal contract Grant administration process and ContractorXxxxxxx’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Grant Management System. Areas of review Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of ContractorXxxxxxx’s obligations under this Contract Grant shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of the Statement of Project of this ContractGrantee’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established in the Statement of Project herein and a final review Evaluation, Review and rating Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Contract Grant term. Contractor Grantee shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance evaluation Evaluation and Review determine that Contractor Xxxxxxx demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established under the Statement of Projecthereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and & Administration (Executive Director), upon request by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Safety, and showing of good cause, may debar Contractor xxxxx Xxxxxxx and prohibit Contractor Grantee from bidding on future contractsGrants. Contractor Grantee may contest the final evaluation Evaluation, Review and result Rating by: (ia) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (iib) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of ContractorGrantee, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. [This section shall apply when the Effective Date is on or after July 1, 2009 and If the maximum amount payable to Contractor hereunder under this Contract is $100,000 or higher] By entering into greater, either on the Effective Date or at any time thereafter, this Contract, §Statewide Contract Management System applies. Contractor agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of concerningthe monitoringof vendor performance on state contracts and inclusion of onstate contractsand inclusionof contract performance information in a statewide contract management system. Contractor’s performance shall be evaluated subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Contract, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of Contractor’s performance shall be part of the normal contract administration process and Contractor’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of review Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of Contractor’s obligations under this Contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to tailoredto match the requirements of the Statement of Project of this ContractContractor’s obligations. Such performance information shall informationshall be entered into enteredinto the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established in the Statement of Project herein and a final review Evaluation, Review and rating Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Contract term. Contractor shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance evaluation Evaluation and Review determine that Contractor demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established under the Statement of Projecthereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Transportation and showing of good cause, may debar Contractor and prohibit Contractor from bidding on future contracts. Contractor may contest the final evaluation Evaluation, Review and result Rating by: (ia) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (iib) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Contractor, by the Executive Director, upon showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. [This section shall apply when the Effective Date is on or after July 1, 2009 and the maximum amount payable to Contractor hereunder is $100,000 or higher] By entering into this Contract, Contractor Contractor(s) agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state contracts and inclusion of contract performance information in a statewide contract management system. Contractor’s performance shall be evaluated in accordance with the terms and conditions provisions of this Contract, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation of Contractor’s performance shall be part of the normal contract administration process and Contractor’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of Contractor’s obligations under this Contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of the Statement of Project Work of this Contract. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established in the Statement of Project and a final review and rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Contract term. Contractor Contractor(s) shall be notified following each performance and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance evaluation determine that Contractor Contractor(s) demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established under the Statement of ProjectWork, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment and showing of good cause, may debar Contractor Contractor(s) and prohibit Contractor Contractor(s) from bidding on future contracts. Contractor Contractor(s) may contest the final evaluation and result by: (i) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (ii) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of ContractorContractor(s), by the Executive Director, upon showing of good cause.. OPTION LETTER Exhibit C Date: State Fiscal Year: Option Letter No. CMS Routing # CORE Encumbrance #

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. [This section shall apply when the Effective Date is on or after July 1, 2009 and If the maximum amount payable to Contractor hereunder Local Agency under this contract is $100,000 or higher] By entering into greater, either on the Effective Date or at any time thereafter, this Contract, Contractor §Statewide Contract Management System applies. Local Agency agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §0024-000-000103- 601, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor Local Agency performance on state contracts and inclusion of contract performance information in a statewide contract management system. ContractorLocal Agency’s performance shall be evaluated subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Contractcontract, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of ContractorLocal Agency’s performance shall be part of the normal contract administration process and ContractorLocal Agency’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract contract Management System. Areas of review Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of ContractorLocal Agency’s obligations under this Contract contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of the Statement of Project of this ContractLocal Agency’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established in the Statement of Project herein and a final review Evaluation, Review and rating Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Contract contract term. Contractor Local Agency shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance evaluation Evaluation and Review determine that Contractor Local Agency demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established under the Statement of Projecthereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Transportation, and showing of good cause, may debar Contractor Local Agency and prohibit Contractor Local Agency from bidding on future contracts. Contractor Local Agency may contest the final evaluation Evaluation, Review and result Rating by: (ia) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (iib) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of ContractorLocal Agency, by the Executive Director, upon showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. [This section shall apply when the Effective Date is on or after July 1, 2009 and If the maximum amount payable to Contractor hereunder Consultant under this Contract is $100,000 or higher] By entering into greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this Contract, Contractor section shall apply. Consultant agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §24-103.5-101 101, §00-000-000, and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state contracts and inclusion of contract performance information in a statewide contract management system. ContractorConsultant’s performance shall be evaluated subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Contract, State law, including CRS C.R.S §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of ContractorConsultant’s performance shall be part of the normal contract administration process and ContractorConsultant’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of review Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of ContractorConsultant’s obligations under this Contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of the Statement of Project of this ContractConsultant’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established in the Statement of Project herein and a final review Evaluation, Review and rating Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Contract term. Contractor Consultant shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance evaluation Evaluation and Review determine that Contractor Consultant demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established under the Statement of Projecthereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Principal Representative, and showing of good cause, may debar Contractor Consultant and prohibit Contractor Consultant from bidding on future contracts. Contractor Consultant may contest the final evaluation Evaluation, Review and result Rating by: (ia) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (iib) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of ContractorConsultant, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. [This section shall apply when the Effective Date is on or after July 1, 2009 and If the maximum amount payable to Contractor hereunder Grantee under this Grant is $100,000 or higher] By entering into greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this Contract, Contractor §19 applies. Grantee agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state contracts Grants and inclusion of contract Grant performance information in a statewide contract management systemContract Management System. ContractorGrantee’s performance shall be evaluated subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this ContractGrant, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of ContractorGrantee’s performance shall be part of the normal contract Grant administration process and ContractorGrantee’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of review Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of ContractorGrantee’s obligations under this Contract Grant shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of the Statement of Project of this ContractGrantee’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established in the Statement of Project herein and a final review Evaluation, Review and rating Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Contract Grant term. Contractor Grantee shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance evaluation Evaluation and Review determine that Contractor Grantee demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established under the Statement of Projecthereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by the Colorado Department Division of Public Health Homeland Security and Environment Emergency Management, and showing of good cause, may debar Contractor Grantee and prohibit Contractor Grantee from bidding on future contractsGrants. Contractor Grantee may contest the final evaluation Evaluation, Review and result Rating by: (ia) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (iib) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of ContractorGrantee, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. [This section shall apply when the Effective Date is on or after July 1, 2009 and If the maximum amount payable to Contractor hereunder Grantee under this Grant is $100,000 or higher] By entering into greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this Contract, Contractor §19 applies. Xxxxxxx agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state contracts Grants and inclusion of contract Grant performance information in a statewide contract management systemContract Management System (CMS). ContractorXxxxxxx’s performance shall be evaluated subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this ContractGrant, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of ContractorXxxxxxx’s performance shall be part of the normal contract Grant administration process and ContractorXxxxxxx’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of review Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of ContractorXxxxxxx’s obligations under this Contract Grant shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of the Statement of Project of this ContractGrantee’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established in the Statement of Project herein and a final review Evaluation, Review and rating Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Contract Grant term. Contractor Grantee shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance evaluation Evaluation and Review determine that Contractor Xxxxxxx demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established under the Statement of Projecthereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and & Administration (Executive Director), upon request by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Safety, and showing of good cause, may debar Contractor xxxxx Xxxxxxx and prohibit Contractor Grantee from bidding on future contractsGrants. Contractor Grantee may contest the final evaluation Evaluation, Review and result Rating by: (ia) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (iib) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-00- 000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of ContractorGrantee, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. [This section shall apply when the Effective Date is on or after July 1, 2009 and ‌ If the maximum amount payable to Contractor hereunder under this Contract is $100,000 or higher] By entering into greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this Contract, §23 applies. Contractor agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, C.R.S., §00-000-000, C.R.S., §00-000-000, C.R.S., §24-103.5-101 101, C.R.S. and §00-000-000 000, C.R.S. concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state contracts and inclusion of contract performance information in a statewide contract management system. Contractor’s performance shall be evaluated subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Contract, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, C.R.S. and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of Contractor’s performance shall be part of the normal contract administration process and Contractor’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of review Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of Contractor’s obligations under this Contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of the Statement of Project of this ContractContractor’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established in the Statement of Project herein and a final review Evaluation, Review and rating Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Contract term. Contractor shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance evaluation Evaluation and Review determine that Contractor demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established under the Statement of Projecthereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by the Colorado Department of Public Health Safety, Division of Fire Prevention and Environment Control, and showing of good cause, may debar Contractor and prohibit Contractor from bidding on future contracts. Contractor may contest the final evaluation Evaluation, Review and result Rating by: (ia) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)105- 102(6),C.R.S.), or (iib) under CRS §24-105-102(6), C.R.S. exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, C.R.S. which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Contractor, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. [This section shall apply when the Effective Date is on or after July 1, 2009 and If the maximum amount payable to Contractor hereunder Local Agency under this contract is $100,000 or higher] By entering into greater, either on the Effective Date or at any time thereafter, this Contract, Contractor § 21. Statewide Contract Management System applies. Local Agency agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §0024-000-000103- 601, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor Local Agency performance on state contracts and inclusion of contract performance information in a statewide Statewide contract management system. ContractorLocal Agency’s performance shall be evaluated subject to evaluation and review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Contractcontract, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rulesfiscal rules, Policies policies and Guidanceguidance. Evaluation and review of Contractorthe Local Agency’s performance shall be part of the normal contract administration process and ContractorLocal Agency’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management Systemcontract management system. Areas of evaluation and review shall include, but shall not be limited to to, quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of ContractorLocal Agency’s obligations under this Contract contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of the Statement of Project of this ContractLocal Agency’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System Statewide contract management system at intervals established in the Statement of Project herein and a final evaluation, review and rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Contract contract term. Contractor Local Agency shall be notified following each performance evaluation and review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance evaluation and review determine that Contractor Local Agency demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established under the Statement of Projecthereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Transportation, and showing of good cause, may debar Contractor Local Agency and prohibit Contractor Local Agency from bidding on future contracts. Contractor Local Agency may contest the final evaluation evaluation, review and result rating by: (ia) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (iib) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of ContractorLocal Agency, by the Executive Director, upon showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. [This section shall apply when the Effective Date is on or after July 1, 2009 and If the maximum amount payable to Contractor hereunder the Local Agency under this Agreement is $100,000 or higher] By entering into greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this Contract, Contractor §26 applies. The Local Agency agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state agreements/contracts and inclusion of agreement/contract performance information in a statewide contract management system. ContractorThe Local Agency’s performance shall be evaluated subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this ContractAgreement, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of Contractorthe Local Agency’s performance shall be part of the normal contract Agreement administration process and Contractorthe Local Agency’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Agreement Management System. Areas of review Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of Contractorthe Local Agency’s obligations under this Contract Agreement shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of the Statement of Project of this ContractLocal Agency’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established in the Statement of Project herein and a final review Evaluation, Review and rating Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Contract Agreement term. Contractor The Local Agency shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance evaluation Evaluation and Review determine that Contractor the Local Agency demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established under the Statement of Projecthereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment CDOT, and showing of good cause, may debar Contractor the Local Agency and prohibit Contractor the Local Agency from bidding on future contractsAgreements. Contractor The Local Agency may contest the final evaluation Evaluation, Review and result Rating by: (ia) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (iib) under CRS §24-105-105- 102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Contractorthe Local Agency, by the Executive Director, upon showing of good cause. THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE EXECUTED THIS CONTRACT CONTRACTOR: STATE OF COLORADO: CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER XXXX X. XXXXXXXXXXXX, GOVERNOR Legal Name of Contracting Entity By Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxx, P.E., Chief Engineer CDOT Vendor #: for Xxxxxx X. Xxxx, Executive Director 20000018 Department of Transportation Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx, Mayor LEGAL REVIEW: XXXX X. XXXXXXX, ATTORNEY GENERAL Date By CORPORATIONS: (A corporate seal or attestation is required.) Attest (Seal) By Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Clerk and Recorder, City and County of Denver APPROVED AS TO FORM: RECOMMENDED AND APPROVED: City Attorney for the CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER By By Manager of Public Works Assistant City Attorney REGISTERED AND COUNTERSIGNED: By: Manager of Finance CONTRACT CONTROL NUMBER: By: Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, Auditor ALL CONTRACTS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE STATE CONTROLLER CRS 00-00-000 requires that the State Controller approve all state contracts. This contract is not valid until the State Controller, or such assistant as he may delegate, has signed it. The contractor is not authorized to begin performance until the contract is signed and dated below. If performance begins prior to the date below, the State of Colorado may not be obligated to pay for the goods and/or services provided. STATE CONTROLLER: XXXXX X. XXXXXXXXX, CPA By Date Scope of Work

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. [This section shall apply when the Effective Date is on or after July 1, 2009 and If the maximum amount payable to Contractor hereunder the Local Agency under this Agreement is $100,000 or higher] By entering into greater, either on the Effective Date or at any time thereafter, this Contract, Contractor §21 applies. The Local Agency agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state agreements/contracts and inclusion of agreement/contract performance information in a statewide contract management system. ContractorThe Local Agency’s performance shall be evaluated subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this ContractAgreement, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of Contractorthe Local Agency’s performance shall be part of the normal contract Agreement administration process and Contractorthe Local Agency’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Agreement Management System. Areas of review Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of Contractorthe Local Agency’s obligations under this Contract Agreement shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of the Statement of Project of this ContractLocal Agency’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established in the Statement of Project herein and a final review Evaluation, Review and rating Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Contract Agreement term. Contractor The Local Agency shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance evaluation Evaluation and Review determine that Contractor the Local Agency demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established under the Statement of Projecthereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment CDOT, and showing of good cause, may debar Contractor the Local Agency and prohibit Contractor the Local Agency from bidding on future contractsAgreements. Contractor The Local Agency may contest the final evaluation Evaluation, Review and result Rating by: (ia) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (iib) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Contractorthe Local Agency, by the Executive Director, upon showing of good cause.