Scope of Review of Subsequent Approvals Sample Clauses

Scope of Review of Subsequent Approvals. City will use its reasonable best efforts to anticipate and communicate to Developer issues and concerns that may arise in connection with any application prior to the application submittal if possible and as early as feasible in the permit process. Developer will use its reasonable best efforts to keep City informed of development applications as they mature, and anticipate and communicate issues of mutual concern prior to submittal of permit applications. By approving the Project Approvals, City has made a final policy decision that the Project is in the best interests of the public health, safety and general welfare. Accordingly, City shall not use its authority in considering any application for a discretionary Subsequent Approval to change the policy decisions reflected by the Project Approvals or otherwise to prevent or delay development of the Project as set forth in the Project Approvals. Instead, the Subsequent Approvals shall be deemed to be tools to implement those final policy decisions. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, City not impose requirements or conditions upon Project development and construction that are inconsistent with the Project Approvals and the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Further, except as expressly provided herein, City shall not exercise discretion in determining whether or how to grant Subsequent Approvals in a manner that would prevent development of the Project for the uses and to the maximum intensity of development set forth in the Project Approvals. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement shall not prevent the City, in acting on Subsequent Approvals, from applying land use regulations which do not conflict with the Vested Elements and the intent of this Agreement.
Sample 1See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Scope of Review of Subsequent Approvals. City shall not use its authority in considering any application for a Subsequent Approval to change the policy decisions reflected in the Existing Approvals and this Agreement. Instead, the scope of review of applications for Subsequent Approvals shall be limited to review of substantial conformity with the Existing OAK #4843-3885-9090 v10 36 Approvals and Applicable Law and compliance with CEQA. City shall not impose conditions or Exactions on Subsequent Approvals that exceed the requirements of, or are otherwise inconsistent with, the Existing Approvals, except as expressly permitted by this Agreement or otherwise required by Applicable Law. At such time as any Subsequent Approval applicable to the Property is approved by City, then such Subsequent Approval shall become subject to all the terms and conditions of this Agreement applicable to Project Approvals and shall be treated as a “Project Approval” under this Agreement.
Sample 1
Scope of Review of Subsequent Approvals. By approving the Project Approvals, City has made a final policy decision that the Project is in the best interests of the public health, safety and general welfare. Accordingly, City shall not use its authority in considering any application for a discretionary Subsequent Approval to change the policy decisions reflected by the Project Approvals or otherwise to prevent or delay development of the Project as set forth in the Project Approvals. Instead, the Subsequent Approvals shall be deemed to be tools to implement those final policy decisions. The scope of the review of applications for Subsequent Approvals shall be limited to a review of substantial conformity with the Vested Elements and the Applicable Rules (except as otherwise provided by Section 2.4), and compliance with CEQA. Where such substantial conformity/compliance exists, City shall not deny an application for a Subsequent Approval for the Project.
Sample 1

Related to Scope of Review of Subsequent Approvals

  • Review and Approval Documents specified above must be submitted for review and approval by CITY Purchasing and Contracts prior to the commencement of work by CONTRACTOR. Neither approval by CITY nor failure to disapprove the insurance furnished by CONTRACTOR shall relieve CONTRACTOR of CONTRACTOR’S full responsibility to provide the insurance required by this Contract. Compliance with the insurance requirements of this Contract shall not limit the liability of CONTRACTOR or its sub-contractors, employees or agents to CITY or others, and shall be in addition to and not in lieu of any other remedy available to CITY under this Contract or otherwise. CITY reserves the right to request and review a copy of any required insurance policy or endorsement to assure compliance with these requirements.

  • County Review and Approval of Insurance Requirements The County reserves the right to review and adjust the Required Insurance provisions, conditioned upon County’s determination of changes in risk exposures.

  • FAA APPROVAL This Agreement may be subject to approval of the FAA. If the FAA disapproves this Agreement, it will become null and void, and both Parties will bear their own expenses relative to this Agreement, up to the date of disapproval.

  • Final Approval Order 62. The Parties shall jointly seek entry of a Final Approval Order, the text of which the Parties shall agree upon. The dismissal orders, motions or stipulation to implement this Section shall, among other things, seek or provide for a dismissal with prejudice and waiving any rights of appeal.

  • ROAD WORK PHASE APPROVAL Purchaser shall obtain written approval from the Contract Administrator upon completion of each of the following phases of road work:  Drainage installation  Subgrade compaction  Rock compaction SUBSECTION RESTRICTIONS

  • Seller’s Approval Buyer must obtain Seller’s approval, in writing, to any change to the letter described in Section IV(c) regarding the financial institution, type of financing, or allocation of closing costs; and

  • State Approval of Replacement Personnel The Engineer may not replace the project manager or key personnel without prior consent of the State. The State must be satisfied that the new project manager or other key personnel is qualified to provide the authorized services. If the State determines that the new project manager or key personnel is not acceptable, the Engineer may not use that person in that capacity and shall replace him or her with one satisfactory to the State within forty-five (45) days.

  • Environmental Inspection at End of Agreement Term A. At Authority’s discretion, at least one hundred and twenty (120) days before the expiration or early termination of the Term as provided herein, Company will conduct an environmental inspection and examination of the Company Premises. At its discretion, Authority may complete environmental reviews to determine if recognized environmental conditions exist that could warrant soil and groundwater sampling. If warranted by the findings of Company or Authority’s inspection or if requested by Authority, a compliance audit or site assessment will be performed within the aforementioned time period by a qualified professional acceptable to Authority who will report the findings to Authority. The cost for professional consulting or engineering services required for such audit will be at the expense of Company. If a site assessment is conducted, Company agrees to pay all associated laboratory and testing fees incurred to test and analyze samples collected during the site assessment process. The Authority may also choose to conduct the compliance audit or site assessment. If the results of the assessment indicate that the Company Premises have been impacted by the release of Hazardous Substances, Company will immediately take such action as is necessary and will provide a substantial guaranty in a form and content acceptable to Authority that Company will clean up the contamination at its own expense, at no expense to Authority, and in accordance with Applicable Laws to the extent that it is obligated to do so by virtue of the foregoing provisions of this Article.

  • REGULATORY FILINGS AND CAISO TARIFF COMPLIANCE 3.1 Filing

  • Necessity for Written Approvals All approvals and decisions of the Regional Water Board under the terms of this Stipulated Order shall be communicated to the Settling Respondent in writing. No oral advice, guidance, suggestions, or comments from Regional Water Board employees or officials regarding submissions or notices shall be construed to relieve the Settling Respondent of its obligation to obtain any final written approval this Stipulated Order requires.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.