RA Deficiency Determination Sample Clauses

RA Deficiency Determination. Notwithstanding Seller’s obligations set forth in Section 3.4(a)(i)(A) or anything to the contrary herein, the Parties acknowledge and agree that:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (18)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
RA Deficiency Determination. For each RA Shortfall Month, Seller shall pay to Buyer as liquidated damages the RA Deficiency Amount, as set forth in Section 3.8(b), and/or provide Replacement RA, as set forth in Section 3.7(g), in each case, as the sole remedy for Capacity Attributes that Seller fails to convey to the Project Participants from the Facility.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (14)
RA Deficiency Determination. Notwithstanding Seller’s obligations set forth in Section 4.3 or anything to the contrary herein, the Parties acknowledge and agree that if Seller has indicated that the [Generating/Storage] Facility will have Full Capacity Deliverability Status on the Cover Sheet, but has failed to obtain such status for the [Generating/Storage] Facility by the RA Guarantee Date, or if Seller otherwise fails to provide Resource Adequacy Benefits in an amount equal to or greater than the Facility’s Qualifying Capacity as required hereunder, then Seller shall pay to Buyer the RA Deficiency Amount for each RA Shortfall Month as liquidated damages due to Buyer for the Capacity Attributes that Seller failed to convey to Buyer.
Sample 1
RA Deficiency Determination. Notwithstanding Seller’s obligations set forth in Section 4.3 or anything to the contrary herein, the Parties acknowledge and agree that if Seller is unable to obtain the deliverability type selected on the Cover Sheet by the RA Guarantee Date, then Seller shall pay to Buyer the RA Deficiency Amount for each RA Shortfall Month as liquidated damages due to Buyer for the Capacity Attributes that Seller failed to convey to Buyer.
Sample 1
RA Deficiency Determination. Notwithstanding Seller’s obligations set forth in Section 4.3 or anything to the contrary herein, the Parties acknowledge and agree that if Seller has failed to obtain Full Capacity Deliverability Status for the Facility by the RA Guarantee Date, or if Seller otherwise fails to provide Resource Adequacy Benefits in an amount equal to the Facility’s Qualifying Capacity as required hereunder, then Seller shall pay to Buyer the RA Deficiency Amount for each RA Shortfall Month as liquidated damages due to Buyer for the Capacity Attributes that Seller failed to convey to Buyer. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in lieu of any RA Deficiency Amount payable to Buyer, for the first and/or second month of the Delivery Term, to the extent that Seller fails to provide Resource Adequacy Benefits (or Replacement RA in lieu thereof) solely due to the CAISO and/or CPUC registration process for new resources, the Storage Rate during such months for such RA Shortfall shall be fifty percent (50%) of the otherwise applicable Storage Rate.
Sample 1

Related to RA Deficiency Determination

  • Penalty Determination H&SC section 39619.7 requires CARB to provide information on the basis for the penalties it seeks. This Agreement includes this information, which is also summarized here. The provision of law the penalty is being assessed under and why that provision is most appropriate for that violation. The penalty provision being applied in this case is H&SC section 42402 et seq. because IIT sold, supplied, offered for sale, consumer products for commerce in California in violation of the Consumer Products Regulations (17 CCR section 94507 et seq.). The penalty provisions of H&SC section 42402 et seq. apply to violations of the Consumer Products Regulations because the regulations were adopted under authority of H&SC section 41712, which is in Part 4 of Division 26. The manner in which the penalty amount was determined, including aggravating and mitigating factors and per unit or per vehicle basis for the penalty. H&SC section 42402 et seq. provides strict liability penalties of up to $10,000 per day for violations of the Consumer Product Regulations with each day being a separate violation. In cases like this, involving unintentional violations of the Consumer Products Regulations where the violator cooperates with the investigation, CARB has obtained penalties for selling uncertified charcoal lighter material in California. In this case, the total penalty is $7,500 for selling uncertified charcoal lighter material in California. The penalty in this case was reduced because this was a strict liability first-time violation and IIT made diligent efforts to cooperate with the investigation. To come into compliance, IIT no longer offers Safegel BBQ & Fireplace Lighting Gel Fire Starter for commerce in California. Final penalties were determined based on the unique circumstances of this matter, considered together with the need to remove any economic benefit from noncompliance, the goal of deterring future violations and obtaining swift compliance, the consideration of past penalties in similar negotiated cases, and the potential cost and risk associated with litigating these particular violations. The penalty reflects violations extending over a number of days resulting in quantifiable harm to the environment considered together with the complete circumstances of this case. Penalties in future cases might be smaller or larger on a per ton basis. The final penalty in this case was based in part on confidential financial information or confidential business information provided by IIT that is not retained by CARB in the ordinary course of business. The penalty in this case was also based on confidential settlement communications between CARB and IIT that CARB does not retain in the ordinary course of business. The penalty also reflects CARB’s assessment of the relative strength of its case against IIT, the desire to avoid the uncertainty, burden and expense of litigation, obtain swift compliance with the law and remove any unfair advantage that IIT may have secured from its actions. Is the penalty being assessed under a provision of law that prohibits the emission of pollution at a specified level, and, if so a quantification of excess emissions, if it is practicable to do so. The Consumer Product Regulations do not prohibit emissions above a specified level, but they do limit the concentration of VOCs in regulated products. In this case, a quantification of the excess emissions attributable to the violations was not practicable.

  • Contract Renegotiation, Suspension, or Termination Due to Change in Funding If the funds DSHS relied upon to establish this Contract or Program Agreement are withdrawn, reduced or limited, or if additional or modified conditions are placed on such funding, after the effective date of this contract but prior to the normal completion of this Contract or Program Agreement:

  • Payment in the Event Losses Fail to Reach Expected Level On the date that is 45 days following the last day (such day, the “True-Up Measurement Date”) of the Final Shared Loss Month, or upon the final disposition of all Shared Loss Assets under this Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement at any time after the termination of the Commercial Shared-Loss Agreement, the Assuming Institution shall pay to the Receiver fifty percent (50%) of the excess, if any, of (i) twenty percent (20%) of the Intrinsic Loss Estimate less (ii) the sum of (A) twenty-five percent (25%) of the asset premium (discount) plus (B) twenty-five percent (25%) of the Cumulative Shared-Loss Payments plus (C) the Cumulative Servicing Amount. The Assuming Institution shall deliver to the Receiver not later than 30 days following the True-Up Measurement Date, a schedule, signed by an officer of the Assuming Institution, setting forth in reasonable detail the calculation of the Cumulative Shared-Loss Payments and the Cumulative Servicing Amount.

  • Eligibility Determination The State or its designee will make eligibility determinations for each of the HHSC HMO Programs.

  • Salary Determination 12.5.1 A unit member shall receive a salary not less than the minimum salary nor more than the maximum salary (Articles 12.3 and 12.4) for the rank to which appointed, except as provided in Articles 4.15, 5.6, 10.6.1 or Article 10.6.1.1. The effective dates for salaries shall be the appropriate dates specified in Article 12.2.2.

  • INDEPENDENT PRICE DETERMINATION 6.1 By signing and submitting this bid, the Bidder certifies that the prices in this bid have been arrived at independently, without consultation, communication or agreement, for the purpose of restricting competition, as to any matter relating to such prices with any other Bidder or with any competitor; unless otherwise required by law, the prices which have been quoted in this bid have not been knowingly disclosed by the Bidder prior to bid opening directly or indirectly to any other Bidder or to any competitor; no attempt has been made, or will be made, by the Bidder to induce any person or firm to submit, or not to submit, a bid for the purpose of restricting competition.

  • Failure to Make Good a Deficiency If the Contractor does not make good a deficiency within a reasonable space of time fixed in a Notice of Non-Compliant Work, the Owner may do any of the following:

  • Independence from Material Breach Determination Except as set forth in Section X.D.1.c, these provisions for payment of Stipulated Penalties shall not affect or otherwise set a standard for OIG’s decision that CHSI has materially breached this CIA, which decision shall be made at OIG’s discretion and shall be governed by the provisions in Section X.D, below.

  • Performance Deficiency The Department or Customer may, in its sole discretion, notify the Contractor of the deficiency to be corrected, which correction must be made within a time-frame specified by the Department or Customer. The Contractor must provide the Department or Customer with a corrective action plan describing how the Contractor will address all issues of contract non-performance, unacceptable performance, and failure to meet the minimum performance levels, deliverable deficiencies, or contract non-compliance.

  • TERMINATION DUE TO CHANGE IN FUNDING ‌ 35 In the event funding from HCA, MCO, State, Federal, or other sources is withdrawn, reduced, or limited 36 in any way after the effective date of this Contract and prior to its normal completion, either party may 37 terminate this Contract subject to re-negotiations.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.