PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE RATING AND STUDENT GROWTH RATING Sample Clauses

PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE RATING AND STUDENT GROWTH RATING. The recommended summative rating matrix model does not rely on uniform, prescriptive formulas to calculate the summative effectiveness rating. By default, evaluations of professional practice account for two-thirds of the final rating, and the final one-third of the rating is influenced by evaluations of student growth. However, the matrix design also provides opportunity for professional judgement to be used in cases where the professional practice and student growth ratings appear to conflict. Refer to Appendix H – Professional Practices Rating & Documentation.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE RATING AND STUDENT GROWTH RATING. The recommended summative rating matrix model does not rely on uniform, prescriptive formulas to calculate the summative effectiveness rating. By default, evaluations of professional practice account for two-thirds of the final rating, and the final one-third of the rating is influenced by evaluations of student growth. However, the matrix design also provides opportunity for professional judgement to be used in cases where the professional practice and student growth ratings appear to conflict. Refer to Appendix H – Professional Practices Rating & Documentation. G. OBSERVATION PROCEDURES 1. Observation procedures, according to SDCL 13-42-34, will be as follows:
Sample 1

Related to PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE RATING AND STUDENT GROWTH RATING

  • Performance Rating Describes the Educator’s performance on each performance standard and overall. There shall be four performance ratings:  Exemplary: the Educator’s performance consistently and significantly exceeds the requirements of a standard or overall. The rating of exemplary on a standard indicates that practice significantly exceeds proficient and could serve as a model of practice on that standard district-wide.  Proficient: the Educator’s performance fully and consistently meets the requirements of a standard or overall. Proficient practice is understood to be fully satisfactory.

  • Insurance Company Rating The required insurance must be written by a company approved to do business in the State or Texas with a financial standing of at least an A- rating, as reflected in Best’s insurance ratings or by a similar rating system recognized within the insurance industry at the time the policy is issued.

  • Moody’s Xxxxx’x Investors Service, Inc. and its successors.

  • Ratings No “nationally recognized statistical rating organization” as such term is defined for purposes of Rule 436(g)(2) (i) has imposed (or has informed the Company that it is considering imposing) any condition (financial or otherwise) on the Company’s retaining any rating assigned to the Company or any securities of the Company or (ii) has indicated to the Company that it is considering any of the actions described in Section 7(c)(ii) hereof.

  • Rating Impact on Student Learning Growth ESE will provide model contract language and guidance on rating educator impact on student learning growth based on state and district-determined measures of student learning. Upon receiving this model contract language and guidance, the parties agree to bargain with respect to this matter.

  • Rating The Notes can be issued without the requirement that they have any rating from a nationally recognized statistical rating organization.

  • Industry Ratings The City will only accept coverage from an insurance carrier who offers proof that it:

  • Evaluation Rating The final summative evaluation level that is assigned to a teacher based on the holistic review of all Evaluation Factors, observed during the Evaluation Cycle. The rating shall be “accomplished”, “skilled”, “developing”, or “ineffective”. The final rating shall not be weighted in such a way that one (1) domain or component of the evaluation system has a higher importance than another, except that any area marked N/A shall not negatively impact the evaluation rating.

  • Maintenance of Rating Since the execution of this Agreement, there shall not have been any decrease in or withdrawal of the rating of any securities of the Company or any of its subsidiaries (including the Bank) by any “nationally recognized statistical rating organization” (as defined for purposes of Section 3(a)(62) of the 0000 Xxx) or any notice given of any intended or potential decrease in or withdrawal of any such rating or of a possible change in any such rating that does not indicate the direction of the possible change.

  • Insurance Carrier Rating Coverages provided by Contractor must be underwritten by an insurance company deemed acceptable to the State of Washington’s Office of Risk Management. Insurance coverage shall be provided by companies authorized to do business within the State of Washington and rated A- Class VII or better in the most recently published edition of Best’s Insurance Rating. Enterprise Services reserves the right to reject all or any insurance carrier(s) with an unacceptable financial rating.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.