No Probable Solution prescribed Sample Clauses

No Probable Solution prescribed. Not applicable. Advertising Devices O15 Advertising Devices within the Detailed Planning Area are: (a) compliment, or at least do not unreasonably detract from the desirable characteristics of the natural and built environment; (b) designed and integrated so as to minimise visual clutter; and (c) constructed to satisfactory standards of public safety. S15.1 Advertising Devices are designed and located in accordance with Local Planning Policy PDLPP 7.0/01 – Siting and Design of Advertising Devices (Caloundra City Planning Scheme 1996). S15.2 Assessment level to be determined by applicable Site Development Plan. The Supplementary Table of Development Assessment nominates a number of signage options as being self-assessable, where designed in accordance with PDLPP 7.0/01. Acoustic Quality
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
No Probable Solution prescribed. A bin storage area is located proximal to the site entry, screened by adjacent landscaping. On-site refuse collection is therefore able to be achieved with the engineering plans demonstrating adequate space for refuse collection vehicles to manoeuvre on-site (refer Callibre drawing 16-000432-DA09). A combination of bulk bins is proposed to cater to the varying forms of waste generated by the use and to encourage opportunities for recycling and waste minimisation.
No Probable Solution prescribed. The planting types identified indicatively on the Landscape Plans forming part of this site development plan have been selected to address the functional, character and privacy needs of the development.
No Probable Solution prescribed. Complies. The proposed basement has been designed and will be constructed as a water excluding structure. Advertising Devices
No Probable Solution prescribed. Complies. Separate bin stores are provided at ground level to allow for the separate collection and containment of refuse generated by the residential and retail components of the development, including separation of recyclate materials. The bin store areas have been located to allow for on-site collection by Council’s refuse contractor. O25 Adequate provision is made for refuse collection for all lots. S25.1 Lots that do not have a frontage readily serviceable by a refuse collection vehicle or have an irregular frontage are allocated concrete bin pads to Complies. The proposed development allows for on-site refuse collection, as demonstrated by the Specific Outcome Probable Solution Site Development Plan Compliance enable ease of access by refuse collection vehicles swept path analysis undertaken by TTM provided as Supporting Information to this SDP.
No Probable Solution prescribed. Complies. The podium and tower element projects toward the Bokarina Boulevard frontage of the site, as required by Maps 13A & 13B of the DPAP. O3 Where adjacent to land within Land Use Area 1 (Residential A), Precincts 5 – 7 are to provide a distinct and recognisable transition down to 3 storeys of residential development along that non-principal (southern) frontage in accordance with Map 13C (Precincts 5-10 – Height Controls) and Map 13D (Precincts 5-10 – Setback Controls) of this document. S3.1 No Probable Solution prescribed. Not applicable. Building Setbacks
No Probable Solution prescribed. Complies. The proposed building setbacks comply with the dimensions nominated on Map 13D of the DPAP. For the tower element, a 9m setback is achieved to the western façade, a 4.6m setback to the northern and 3.76m to the eastern façade. Specific Outcome Probable Solution Site Development Plan Compliance At the ground plane, the retail tenancies and lobby areas vary in their setback to allow for a direct interface with the northern and eastern footpaths ins sections, whilst allowing for the creation of a plaza at the prominent north-eastern corner of the site by having an increased building setback. A varying setback between 1.95m and 2.9m has been provided to the south-eastern corner of the site to allow for deep planting opportunities along the non-active sections of the Longboard Parade frontage, whilst allowing for a continuation of the curved façade treatment that characterises the balance of the northern and eastern frontages (internal to the awning).
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
No Probable Solution prescribed. Complies. A significant setback is provided to the southern boundary of Precinct 8, well in excess of that nominated on Map 13D of the DPAP. O6 In the event Precincts 5 – 10 (or part thereof) are amalgamated, the boundary setbacks nominated for podium and tower elements on Map 13D (Precincts 5-10 – Setback Controls) of this document are to be maintained. S6.1 No Probable Solution prescribed. Not applicable. O7 Development encourages overlooking and passive engagement between S7.1 Balconies orientated to a Primary Active Frontage, as notated on Map 11 (Active Complies. Specific Outcome Probable Solution Site Development Plan Compliance residential dwelling units and the principal site frontage to streets, public spaces, the beach and Village Park. Frontages) of this document, may extend beyond the minimum setback dimension nominated on Map 13D (Precincts 5-10 – Setback Controls) (i.e. beyond 3 metres and up to the front property alignment). The balconies presenting toward Bokarina Boulevard are setback approximately 2.76m from the northern boundary (OMP), while the balconies presenting toward Longboard Parade are setback approx. 2.5m from the eastern frontage. O8 Adequate separation is maintained between tower balconies, to ensure appropriate levels of privacy and amenity for visitors and residents. S8.1 Balconies to adjacent towers are not to be located closer than 15 metres. Complies. The westernmost balconies achieve a minimum setback of 9m, thereby ensuring a comparable setback to the balconies on Precinct 7 will achieve a combined separation in excess of 15m. Building Height, Siting and Design
No Probable Solution prescribed. Complies. The proposed development comprises an eight (8) storey building measuring a maximum of 28m in height, with 25m from ground level to the ceiling of the 8th storey in accordance with Local Planning PolicyBuilding Height PDLPP 3.7/01.
No Probable Solution prescribed. Complies. The proposed site coverage of the tower element is significantly less than that permitted by Map 13A of the DPAP, given the proposal to deliver a building on an east- west axis.
Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.