New Locks Pursuant to Court Order Sample Clauses

New Locks Pursuant to Court Order. Any Tenant who has obtained an order (excluding ex parte orders) granting such Tenant possession of the Dwelling Unit to the exclusion of one or more other Tenants or authorized occupants in accordance with the provisions of Section 55-248.18:1 of the VRLTA may request Landlord to install new locks or other security devices on all exterior doors of the Dwelling Unit. Tenant will reimburse Landlord’s actual costs for such new locks or security devices. All such costs will be paid by Tenant as additional rent with the next monthly payment of Rent by Tenant after receipt by Tenant of an invoice from Landlord
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to New Locks Pursuant to Court Order

  • Court Order By Seller or Buyer if consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby shall violate any nonappealable final order, decree or judgment of any court or governmental body having competent jurisdiction;

  • Final Approval Order and Judgment 68. Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Approval of the Settlement will include a request to the Court for a scheduled date on which the Final Approval Hearing will occur. Plaintiff shall file her Motion for Final Approval of the Settlement, and application for attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses and for Service Award for the Class Representative, no later than 45 days before the Final Approval Hearing. At the Final Approval Hearing, the Court will hear argument on Plaintiff’s Motion for Final Approval of the Settlement, and on Class Counsel’s application for attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses, and for the Service Award for the Class Representative. In the Court’s discretion, the Court also will hear argument at the Final Approval Hearing from any Settlement Class Members (or their counsel) who object to the Settlement or to Class Counsel’s application for attorneys’ fees, costs, expenses, or the Service Award application, provided the objector(s) submitted timely objections that meet all of the requirements listed in the Agreement.

  • Final Order If the Interim Order is obtained and the Arrangement Resolution is approved at the Company Meeting in accordance with the terms of the Interim Order, the Company shall take all steps necessary to submit the Arrangement to the Court and diligently pursue an application for the Final Order pursuant to section 182 of the OBCA, as soon as reasonably practicable, but in any event not later than three Business Days, after the Arrangement Resolution is passed at the Company Meeting as provided for in the Interim Order.

  • Court Orders ICANN will respect any order from a court of competent jurisdiction, including any orders from any jurisdiction where the consent or non-­‐objection of the government was a requirement for the delegation of the TLD. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, ICANN’s implementation of any such order will not be a breach of this Agreement

  • THE COURT’S FINAL APPROVAL HEARING The Court will hold a hearing to decide whether to approve the settlement. You may attend and you may ask to speak, but you don’t have to.

  • Limitation on Out-of-State Litigation Texas Business and Commerce Code § 272 This is a requirement of the TIPS Contract and is non-negotiable. Texas Business and Commerce Code § 272 prohibits a construction contract, or an agreement collateral to or affecting the construction contract, from containing a provision making the contract or agreement, or any conflict arising under the contract or agreement, subject to another state’s law, litigation in the courts of another state, or arbitration in another state. If included in Texas construction contracts, such provisions are voidable by a party obligated by the contract or agreement to perform the work. By submission of this proposal, Vendor acknowledges this law and if Vendor enters into a construction contract with a Texas TIPS Member under this procurement, Vendor certifies compliance.

  • MAGISTRATE’S COURT JURISDICTION The Parties hereto consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrates' Court in terms of Section 45 read with Section 28 of the Magistrates’ Court Act of 1944 as amended. Notwithstanding the aforementioned, this shall not preclude either Party from approaching the High Court of South Africa for any relief sought. This Agreement shall further be governed in terms of the law of the Republic of South Africa.

  • Limitation on Out-of-State Litigation - Texas Business and Commerce Code § 272 This is a requirement of the TIPS Contract and is non-negotiable. Texas Business and Commerce Code § 272 prohibits a construction contract, or an agreement collateral to or affecting the construction contract, from containing a provision making the contract or agreement, or any conflict arising under the contract or agreement, subject to another state’s law, litigation in the courts of another state, or arbitration in another state. If included in Texas construction contracts, such provisions are voidable by a party obligated by the contract or agreement to perform the work. By submission of this proposal, Vendor acknowledges this law and if Vendor enters into a construction contract with a Texas TIPS Member under this procurement, Vendor certifies compliance.

  • Disclosure Statement to Consumer Please read this statement before you acknowledge it. Before you enter into a marketing contract for the supply of Energy you should understand the following:

  • LAW APPLICABLE AND COMPETENT COURT 6.1 The Agreement is governed by [insert the national law of the NA].

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.