Judgment of the Court Sample Clauses

Judgment of the Court. 1. The Court shall consider and determine every reference made to it pursuant to this Treaty in accordance with the Rules of Court, and shall deliver in public session a reasoned judgment which, subject to the provisions of the said Rules as to review, shall be final and conclusive and not open to appeal: Provided that, if the Court considers that in the special circumstances of the case it is undesirable that its judgment be delivered in open Court, the Court may make an order to that effect and deliver its judgment before the parties privately.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (7)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Judgment of the Court. The present case is an appeal by Alcon International Limited, a limited liability company incorporated in the Republic of Kenya, against the decision of the First Instance Division of the Court in Reference No. 6 of 2010. The Standard Chartered Bank of Uganda; the Attorney-General of the Republic of Uganda; and the Registrar of the High Court of Uganda are the 1st, 2nd and 3rd Respondents, respectively. The substance of the dispute between the Parties as placed before the court below is as follows: The Appellant company was contracted by the National Social Security Fund, Uganda (NSSF) to construct ‘Workers House’, in Kampala. NSSF terminated the agreement and this set in motion arbitration proceedings under the contract. The Appellant was the successful party in the arbitration proceedings and was awarded US $8,858,469.97. This arbitral award is being contested in the courts in Uganda and the matter is now before the Supreme Court as Civil Appeal No. 15 of 2009, in which NSSF wants to set aside the arbitral award. While the matter is being litigated in the courts in Uganda, the Appellant herein instituted Reference No. 6 of 2010 in the First Instance Division against the above-mentioned Respondents seeking the following reliefs –
Sample 1Sample 2
Judgment of the Court. A Leave to appeal is granted (Air New Zealand Limited v New Zealand Air Line Pilots’ Association Incorporated [2016] NZCA 131). B The approved question is should the Court of Appeal have dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction? Solicitors: New Zealand Air Line Pilots’ Association Incorporated, Manukau for Applicant Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Auckland for Appellant
Sample 1
Judgment of the Court. A The respondent must pay the appellant costs in this Court of $22,500 plus usual disbursements. B The costs award made in the Court of Appeal is quashed. The appellant is awarded costs in that Court on a band A basis together with usual disbursements. C The appellant is awarded costs in the High Court on a 2B basis together with reasonable disbursements, to be fixed by the Registrar if necessary. REASONS (Given by Xxxxx Xxxxxx X)
Sample 1
Judgment of the Court. The Parties agree to accept the Judgment of the Court given pursuant to this Special Agreement as final and binding upon them.
Sample 1

Related to Judgment of the Court

  • Competent Court The Court of Milan shall have jurisdiction over any dispute arising out of this offer to purchase.

  • THE COURT’S FAIRNESS HEARING The Court will hold a hearing to decide whether to approve the Settlement. You may attend and you may ask to speak, but you don’t have to.

  • LAW APPLICABLE AND COMPETENT COURT 6.1 The Agreement is governed by [insert the national law of the NA].

  • THE COURT’S FINAL APPROVAL HEARING The Court will hold a hearing to decide whether to approve the settlement. You may attend and you may ask to speak, but you don’t have to.

  • OBJECTIVE OF THE CITY 8. It is agreed that the delivery of municipal services in the most efficient, effective and courteous manner is of paramount importance to the City and its employees. Such achievement is recognized to be a mutual obligation of the parties to this MOU within their respective roles and responsibilities.

  • Continuing Jurisdiction of the Court The Parties agree that, after entry of Judgment, the Court will retain jurisdiction over the Parties, Action, and the Settlement solely for purposes of (i) enforcing this Agreement and/or Judgment, (ii) addressing settlement administration matters, and (iii) addressing such post-Judgment matters as are permitted by law.

  • COMPETENT JURISDICTION The entire Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of Gibraltar and the parties hereto irrevocably submit to the jurisdiction of the Courts of Gibraltar and irrevocably consents to the service of process out of such Courts by mailing copies thereof by registered mail, postage prepaid to his/her address.

  • Applicable law and competent court 15.1 The Agreement is governed by law of the Czech Republic.

  • Attending Court 20.1 An employee who loses time by being required, in a case in which the Company is involved, to attend court or coroner's inquest, or to appear as a witness, shall be paid for time lost. If no time is lost, such employee shall be paid for actual time held, with a minimum of four (4) hours at one and one-half (1 1/2) times his/her hourly rate.

  • Courts The parties agree that the State and Federal courts in The City of New York shall have jurisdiction for purposes of enforcement of their agreement to submit Disputes to arbitration and of any award of the Arbitrator.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.