Job Order Proposal Review Sample Clauses

Job Order Proposal Review. The Owner and the Contractor shall review Contractor’s Job Order Proposal and negotiate any changes, clarifications or modifications as required. The Contractor shall submit a revised Job Order Proposal incorporating any changes, clarifications or modifications made in the review process. The Owner may accept, reject or seek modification of any Job Order Proposal.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Job Order Proposal Review. Owner shall review each Job Order Proposal and advise Contractor of any provisions Owner determines are unacceptable. Owner and Contractor shall negotiate in good faith to resolve any issues and to formulate changes, clarifications or modifications to any Job Order Proposal(s) as required. Contractor shall submit a revised Job Order Proposal incorporating any such changes, clarifications or modifications made in the review process. Owner may accept, reject or seek modification of any Job Order Proposal.‌
Job Order Proposal Review. Each Price Proposal received from Contractor will be reviewed in detail for the appropriateness of quantities and tasks selected. Submittals will be reviewed, as well as the work duration schedule and list of Subcontractors. County will evaluate the proposed work units and may compare them with the independent County estimate of the same tasks to determine the reasonableness of approach, including the nature and number of work units proposed. County will determine whether Contractor’s Price Proposal is acceptable. The Contractor may choose the means and methods of construction; subject, however, to the County’s right to reject any means and methods proposed by the Contractor that:
Job Order Proposal Review. Each Price Proposal received from Contractor will be reviewed in detail for the appropriateness of quantities and tasks selected. Submittals will be reviewed, as well as the work duration schedule and list of Subcontractors. County will evaluate the proposed work units and may compare them with the independent County estimate of the same tasks to determine the reasonableness of approach, including the nature and number of work units proposed. County will determine whether The Contractor may choose the means and methods of construction; subject, y means and methods proposed by the Contractor that:

Related to Job Order Proposal Review

  • Technical Proposal The technical proposal may be presented in free format. It shall not exceed ten pages, not counting the CVs. It shall respect the following page limit and structure: • Technical methodology (max. 7 pages) • Quality management (max. 1 page) • Project management (max. 1 page) • Resource management (proposal (max. 1 page) + CVs of experts)

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Staffing Plan 8.l The Board and the Association agree that optimum class size is an important aspect of the effective educational program. The Polk County School Staffing Plan shall be constructed each year according to the procedures set forth in Board Policy and, upon adoption, shall become Board Policy.

  • Training Plan Within 90 days after the Effective Date, Good Shepherd shall develop a written plan (Training Plan) that outlines the steps Good Shepherd will take to ensure that: (a) all Covered Persons receive adequate training regarding Good Shepherd’s CIA requirements and Compliance Program, including the Code of Conduct and (b) all Relevant Covered Persons receive adequate training regarding: (i) the Federal health care program requirements regarding eligibility for hospice services upon initial admission, recertification for continued stay, and for Continuous Care, Respite Care, and General Inpatient Care; (ii) the role of physicians in making eligibility determinations; (iii) the accurate coding and submission of claims; (iv) policies, procedures, and other requirements applicable to the documentation of medical records; (v) the personal obligation of each individual involved in the claims submission process to ensure that such claims are accurate; (vi) applicable reimbursement statutes, regulations, and program requirements and directives; (vii) the legal sanctions for violations of the Federal health care program requirements; and (viii) examples of proper and improper eligibility determinations, documentation, and claims submission practices. The Training Plan shall include information regarding the training topics, the categories of Covered Persons and Relevant Covered Persons required to attend each training session, the length of the training, the schedule for training, and the format of the training. Within 30 days of the OIG’s receipt of Good Shepherd’s Training Plan, OIG will notify Good Shepherd of any comments or objections to the Training Plan. Absent notification by the OIG that the Training Plan is unacceptable, Good Shepherd may implement its Training Plan. Good Shepherd shall furnish training to its Covered Persons and Relevant Covered Persons pursuant to the Training Plan during each Reporting Period.

  • Peer Review Dental Group, after consultation with the Joint ----------- Operations Committee, shall implement, regularly review, modify as necessary or appropriate and obtain the commitment of Providers to actively participate in peer review procedures for Providers. Dental Group shall assist Manager in the production of periodic reports describing the results of such procedures. Dental Group shall provide Manager with prompt notice of any information that raises a reasonable risk to the health and safety of Group Patients or Beneficiaries. In any event, after consultation with the Joint Operations Committee, Dental Group shall take such action as may be reasonably warranted under the facts and circumstances.

  • Program Review The Contracting Officer or other authorized government representative may hold semi- annual program review meetings. Such meetings will be held via telecom or video teleconferencing. However, the Government reserves the right to request a meeting in person. The meetings will include all BPA holders, representatives from prospective customer agencies, a combination of current and prospective customer agencies, or individual BPA holders. Some Federal Government Agencies and any approved State, Local and Tribal agencies may establish a central program management function. Such users may require their primary suppliers to participate in agency program review meetings on a periodic basis, at no additional cost to the Government.

  • Questions About Review The Asset Representations Reviewer will make appropriate personnel available to respond in writing to written questions or requests for clarification of any Review Report from the Indenture Trustee or the Servicer until the earlier of (i) the payment in full of the Notes and (ii) one year after the delivery of the Review Report. The Asset Representations Reviewer will not be obligated to respond to questions or requests for clarification from a Noteholder or any other Person and will direct such Persons to submit written questions or requests to the Indenture Trustee.

  • AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES A. Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this AGREEMENT that is not disposed of by AGREEMENT, shall be reviewed by LOCAL AGENCY’S Chief Financial Officer.

  • Request for Proposals A State request inviting proposals for Goods or Services. This Contract shall be governed by the statutes, regulations and procedures of the State of Connecticut, Department of Administrative Services.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.