Interim Service Rating Sample Clauses

Interim Service Rating. If the employee believes the rating to be inaccurate, unwarranted, unfair, arbitrary or capricious, or fails to consider mitigating circumstances, or that the time limits for compliance are unreasonable, the employee shall, within ten calendar days of issuance of the rating, (1) submit a Statement of Dissent, answering and specifying each item in the rating that the employee disagrees with; and (2) appeal in writing to the next level of supervision above the level imposing the Interim Service Rating. The party to whom the appeal is directed shall confer with the employee and the supervisor imposing the Interim Service Rating, and may set aside, modify or affirm the Rating within ten calendar days. If dissatisfied with the action of the person to whom the appeal is taken, the employee may, within ten calendar days, appeal to the Director. The Director or his designee shall respond within ten calendar days. No further appeal shall be permitted; however, the propriety of the Interim Service Rating may be an issue at any subsequent hearing if the employee is discharged or demoted.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Interim Service Rating

  • Performance Rating Describes the Educator’s performance on each performance standard and overall. There shall be four performance ratings:  Exemplary: the Educator’s performance consistently and significantly exceeds the requirements of a standard or overall. The rating of exemplary on a standard indicates that practice significantly exceeds proficient and could serve as a model of practice on that standard district-wide.  Proficient: the Educator’s performance fully and consistently meets the requirements of a standard or overall. Proficient practice is understood to be fully satisfactory.

  • Moody’s Xxxxx’x Investors Service, Inc. and its successors.

  • Ratings No “nationally recognized statistical rating organization” as such term is defined for purposes of Rule 436(g)(2) (i) has imposed (or has informed the Company that it is considering imposing) any condition (financial or otherwise) on the Company’s retaining any rating assigned to the Company or any securities of the Company or (ii) has indicated to the Company that it is considering any of the actions described in Section 7(c)(ii) hereof.

  • Insurance Company Rating The required insurance must be written by a company approved to do business in the State or Texas with a financial standing of at least an A- rating, as reflected in Best’s insurance ratings or by a similar rating system recognized within the insurance industry at the time the policy is issued.

  • PRIORITY RATING If so identified, this Contract is a "rated order" certified for national defense, emergency preparedness, and energy program use, and SELLER shall follow all the requirements of the Defense Priorities and Allocation System Regulation (15 C.F.R. Part 700).

  • Credit Rating With respect to the Competitive Supplier or Competitive Supplier’s Guarantor, its senior unsecured, unsubordinated long-term debt rating, not supported by third party credit enhancement, and if such debt is no longer rated, then the corporate or long-term issuer rating of Competitive Supplier or Competitive Supplier’s Guarantor.

  • Rating The Notes can be issued without the requirement that they have any rating from a nationally recognized statistical rating organization.

  • Insurance Carrier Rating Coverages provided by Contractor must be underwritten by an insurance company deemed acceptable to the State of Washington’s Office of Risk Management. Insurance coverage shall be provided by companies authorized to do business within the State of Washington and rated A- Class VII or better in the most recently published edition of Best’s Insurance Rating. Enterprise Services reserves the right to reject all or any insurance carrier(s) with an unacceptable financial rating.

  • Evaluation Rating The final summative evaluation level that is assigned to a teacher based on the holistic review of all Evaluation Factors, observed during the Evaluation Cycle. The rating shall be “accomplished”, “skilled”, “developing”, or “ineffective”. The final rating shall not be weighted in such a way that one (1) domain or component of the evaluation system has a higher importance than another, except that any area marked N/A shall not negatively impact the evaluation rating.

  • Industry Ratings The City will only accept coverage from an insurance carrier who offers proof that it:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.