INCONSISTENT USES Sample Clauses

INCONSISTENT USES. TENANT shall not use the Leased Premises in a manner inconsistent with the purpose of this Agreement as set forth in Section 2 above, unless such activities are pursuant to a separate written agreement with the CITY. TENANT shall not operate any non-aviation activity on the Leased Premises. In addition, TENANT shall not use the Leased Premises for “business or commercial activity” within the meaning of Chapter 9, Section 9-9-13(C) of the Mesa City Code. TENANT shall not use the Leased Premises for residential purposes.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
INCONSISTENT USES. LESSEE shall not conduct any non-aeronautical activity from the Hangar. In addition, LESSEE shall not use the Hangar for “business or commercial activity” within the meaning of the Airport’s Minimum Standards for Commercial Aviation Operators unless a separate written agreement is entered into with the County. LESSEE shall not use the Hangar for residential purposes.
Sample 1
INCONSISTENT USES. Using the Property in ways that are inconsistent with the Conservation Purposes in perpetuity.
Sample 1
INCONSISTENT USES. The Easement shall prohibit any uses that are inconsistent with the Mitigation Permits within the temporary construction easement. Inconsistent uses shall include, but not be limited to: constructing or erecting any new permanent or temporary structures (including, but not limited to, fences, signs, pits, xxxxx, and tanks) within the Easement that are not authorized by the Mitigation Permits; stockpiling or storing materials (including, but not limited to, solid wastes and debris) that are inconsistent with the Mitigation Permits and purposes; parking of vehicles that are not being utilized for the mitigation activities authorized by the Mitigation Permits; and any other uses, activities, or conduct within the Easement which would or could foreseeably present a safety problem.
Sample 1
INCONSISTENT USES. LESSEE shall use the hangar solely for the non-commercial storage of non-aeronautical property consistent with the Airport’s Policy on Non-Aeronautical Storage in County T-Hangars and FAA Policy on Use of Hangars at Obligated Airports. LESSEE shall not use the Hangar for any type of aeronautical or non-aeronautical “business or commercial activity”. LESSEE shall not use the Hangar for residential purposes.
Sample 1

Related to INCONSISTENT USES

  • Inconsistencies To the extent of any inconsistencies between the terms and conditions of this Amendment and the terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Amendment shall prevail. All terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement not inconsistent herewith shall remain in full force and effect and are hereby ratified and confirmed by Borrowers.

  • No Inconsistent Agreements Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has entered, as of the date hereof, nor shall the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, on or after the date of this Agreement, enter into any agreement with respect to its securities, that would have the effect of impairing the rights granted to the Holders in this Agreement or otherwise conflicts with the provisions hereof. Except as set forth on Schedule 6(i), neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has previously entered into any agreement granting any registration rights with respect to any of its securities to any Person that have not been satisfied in full.

  • Inconsistency In the event of any inconsistency between the provisions of the Schedule and the other provisions of this Master Agreement, the Schedule will prevail. In the event of any inconsistency between the provisions of any Confirmation and this Master Agreement (including the Schedule), such Confirmation will prevail for the purpose of the relevant Transaction.

  • No Inconsistent Statements No person has made any oral or written statements or representations to you that are inconsistent with the information in this Investment Agreement and the Disclosure Materials.

  • Attachments, inconsistencies and severability This Consortium Agreement consists of this core text and Attachment 1 (Background included) Attachment 2 (Accession document) Attachment 3 (List of Third Parties for simplified transfer according to Section 8.2.2) Attachment 4 (Identified Affiliated Entities) In case the terms of this Consortium Agreement are in conflict with the terms of the Grant Agreement, the terms of the latter shall prevail. In case of conflicts between the attachments and the core text of this Consortium Agreement, the latter shall prevail. Should any provision of this Consortium Agreement become invalid, illegal or unenforceable, it shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this Consortium Agreement. In such a case, the Parties concerned shall be entitled to request that a valid and practicable provision be negotiated which fulfils the purpose of the original provision.

  • Collocation Transfer of Responsibility Without Working Circuits The Collocation is not serving any End User Customers and does not have active service terminations (e.g., Interconnection trunks or UNE Loops) or 2) Collocation Transfer of Responsibility With Working Circuits – The Collocation has active service terminations, such as Interconnection trunks or is serving End User Customers.

  • Private Letter Ruling or Change or Clarification of Law At Interconnection Customer’s request and expense, Transmission Owner shall file with the IRS a request for a private letter ruling as to whether any property transferred or sums paid, or to be paid, by Interconnection Customer to Transmission Owner under this GIA are subject to federal income taxation. Interconnection Customer will prepare the initial draft of the request for a private letter ruling, and will certify under penalties of perjury that all facts represented in such request are true and accurate to the best of Interconnection Customer’s knowledge. Transmission Owner and Interconnection Customer shall cooperate in good faith with respect to the submission of such request. Transmission Owner shall keep Interconnection Customer fully informed of the status of such request for a private letter ruling and shall execute either a privacy act waiver or a limited power of attorney, in a form acceptable to the IRS, that authorizes Interconnection Customer to participate in all discussions with the IRS regarding such request for a private letter ruling. Transmission Owner shall allow Interconnection Customer to attend all meetings with IRS officials about the request and shall permit Interconnection Customer to prepare the initial drafts of any follow-up letters in connection with the request.

  • Conflict To the extent any of the terms of this Amendment conflict with the terms of the Contract, the terms of this Amendment shall control.

  • Conflict or Inconsistency In the event of a conflict or inconsistency between any of the requirements of:

  • Tariff References 3.5.1 References to state tariffs throughout this Agreement shall be to the currently effective tariff for the state or jurisdiction in which the services were provisioned; provided however, where certain AT&T-22STATE services or tariff provisions have been or become deregulated or detariffed, any reference in this Agreement to a detariffed or deregulated service or provision of such tariff shall be deemed to refer to the service description, price list or other agreement pursuant to which AT&T-22STATE provides such services as a result of detariffing or deregulation.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.