Improving Data Quality Sample Clauses

Improving Data Quality. Availability of high-quality HRH related data is a serious problem. Unfortunately, over the decades, this problem has not been acknowledged by DoH. Most of the KP related articles, reviewed during this case study, also mentioned the same problem. The reason is absence of effective strategy by DoH KP towards HRH data management. As already mentioned, further research is needed to completely understand the problem of physician retention in KP. It is only possible when complete data related to HRH is available. DoH KP needs to work in collaboration with PMDC and CPSP to ensure management and availability of high-quality data related to HRH. This will encourage researchers to conduct quality research in future which will help DoH KP to design and evidence-based policies to achieve better outcomes. Table 7. summarizes these recommendations, stakeholders responsible for their implementation and intended outcome for each of these recommendations. In addition to providing rough estimates of timeline, feasibility and affordability of these interventions is also graded in the table. Table 7: Summary of Recommendations for DoH KP to Improve Physician Retention in PHCFs Recommendation Responsibility to Implement Timeline Feasibility 0-1 Easy 1-3 Moderate 4-5 Challenging Budget Affordability 0-1 Easy 1-3 Moderate 4-5 Challenging Intended Outcome Financial incentives DoH KP, Ministry of Finance (MoF) KP 6 months to 1 year 3-6 months for mapping 3-6 for approval from MoF & cabinet division 3-moderate 4-challenging To encourage physicians to join PHCFs, esp. in rural KP Restrictive Measures and Sanctions DoH KP 3 months 1-easy 0-easy Obligates physicians to serve in PHCFs Personal and Professional Development Opportunities DoH KP 2 years for Planning, devising mechanism, strengthening the institutions and coordination with other agencies like PMDC, CPSP 4-challenging 3-moderate To retain and motivate physicians to serve in PHCFs Family Medicine Programmes DoH KP, CPSP, PMDC 3-5 years This includes: developing policy; 2-4 years for PGT of physicians in FM; Creating a cadre for FM; Devising policy and drafting commission document for replacing current system with GP system. 4-challenging 2-moderate To train physicians exclusively for primary health care. Policies to Encourage Female Physicians to Enter Practice DoH KP 2-3 years Formulate rational distribution of HRH, mapping of health facilities and physicians. Upgrading facilities Special services for female physicians lik...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Improving Data Quality

  • Data Quality 4.1 Each party ensures that the shared Personal Data is accurate.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting Evaluation A. The Project Implementing Entity shall monitor and evaluate the progress of its activities under the Project and prepare Project Reports in accordance with the provisions of Section 5.08(b) of the General Conditions and on the basis of indicators agreed with the Bank. Each such report shall cover the period of one

  • For Product Development Projects and Project Demonstrations  Published documents, including date, title, and periodical name.  Estimated or actual energy and cost savings, and estimated statewide energy savings once market potential has been realized. Identify all assumptions used in the estimates.  Greenhouse gas and criteria emissions reductions.  Other non-energy benefits such as reliability, public safety, lower operational cost, environmental improvement, indoor environmental quality, and societal benefits.  Data on potential job creation, market potential, economic development, and increased state revenue as a result of the project.  A discussion of project product downloads from websites, and publications in technical journals.  A comparison of project expectations and performance. Discuss whether the goals and objectives of the Agreement have been met and what improvements are needed, if any.

  • Authorized User Overview and Mini-Bid Process Project Based IT Consulting Services Contracts enable Authorized Users to use a competitive Mini-bid Process to acquire Services on an as-needed basis, for qualified IT Projects. Project Based IT Consulting Services may include, but will not be limited to projects requiring: analysis, data classification, design, development, testing, quality assurance, security and associated training for Information Technology based applications. See section 1.3 Out of Scope Work for a listing of projects expressly excluded from the scope of this Contract. An Authorized User Agreement for Project Based IT Consulting Services will be governed first by the terms and conditions specified in the OGS Centralized Contract and second by terms and conditions added to the Authorized User Statement of Work. Additional terms and conditions shall not conflict with or modify the terms and conditions of the OGS Centralized Contract. NYS Executive Agencies must adhere to all internal processes and approvals including, as required, approval from NYS Office of Information Technology Services. Other Authorized Users must adhere to their own internal processes and approvals. In accordance with Appendix B, section 28, Modification of Contract Terms, an Authorized User may add additional required terms and conditions to this Mini-Bid and resultant Authorized User Agreement only if such terms and conditions (1) are more favorable to the Authorized User and (2) do not conflict with or supersede the OGS Centralized Contract terms and conditions. Examples of additional terms and conditions include: • Expedited delivery timeframe; • Additional incentives, such as discount for expedited payment/Procurement Card use; and • Any additional requirements imposed by the funding source or Federal law.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • Financial Viability and Regulatory Compliance 4.6.1 The Contractor warrants and represents that its corporate entity is in good standing with all applicable federal, state, and local licensing authorities and that it possesses all requisite licenses to perform the services required by this contract. The Contractor further warrants and represents that it owes no outstanding delinquent federal, state, or local taxes or business assessments.

  • Constructability Review Prepare detailed interdisciplinary constructability review within Fourteen (14) days of receipt of the plans from the District that:

  • Additional Information for Product Development Projects Outcome of product development efforts, such copyrights and license agreements. • Units sold or projected to be sold in California and outside of California. • Total annual sales or projected annual sales (in dollars) of products developed under the Agreement. • Investment dollars/follow-on private funding as a result of Energy Commission funding. • Patent numbers and applications, along with dates and brief descriptions.  Additional Information for Product Demonstrations: • Outcome of demonstrations and status of technology. • Number of similar installations. • Jobs created/retained as a result of the Agreement.

  • Geological and Archeological Specimens If, during the execution of the Work, the Contractor, any Subcontractor, or any servant, employee, or agent of either should uncover any valuable material or materials, such as, but not limited to, treasure trove, geological specimens, archival material, archeological specimens, or ore, the Contractor acknowledges that title to the foregoing is vested in the Owner. The Contractor shall notify the Owner upon the discovery of any of the foregoing, shall take reasonable steps to safeguard it, and seek further instruction from the Design Professional. Any additional cost incurred by the Contractor shall be addressed under the provision for changed conditions. The Contractor agrees that the Geological and Water Resources Division and the Historic Preservation Division of the Georgia Department of Natural Resources may inspect the Work at reasonable times.

  • COUNTY’S QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN The County or its agent will evaluate the Contractor’s performance under this Contract on not less than an annual basis. Such evaluation will include assessing the Contractor’s compliance with all Contract terms and conditions and performance standards. Contractor deficiencies which the County determines are severe or continuing and that may place performance of the Contract in jeopardy if not corrected will be reported to the Board of Supervisors. The report will include improvement/corrective action measures taken by the County and the Contractor. If improvement does not occur consistent with the corrective action measures, the County may terminate this Contract or impose other penalties as specified in this Contract.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.