Case Study Selection Methodology Sample Clauses

Case Study Selection Methodology. The case study investigation in WP3 is designed “To identify key barriers and incentives for societal engagement under the terms of RRI across three domains – nanotechnology; food & health; bio-economy – and from the point of view of Third sector actors and other stakeholders/actors contributing to RRI, including science/technology policy makers, research funders, academics, industry.” Our investigation and subsequent analysis of the interviews connected with these nine case studies will explore the similarities and differences in the perspectives of the various stakeholders contributing to RRI. The case study selection process was developed iteratively and collaboratively with the relevant PROSO project partners. Regular (bi-monthly) meetings were instigated during which the search, recording, and selection criteria were sequentially discussed and timelines for each phase of selection determined. This ensured a transparent, timely and harmonised approach to selection of cases across the three domains. During these meetings, core concepts were being defined and agreed upon (such as the definition of the ‘case’, ‘societal engagement’). These concepts, as agreed by the WP3 consortium partners, are reviewed in this document. The starting points and resources for the case study search were:  Previous projects on societal engagement and RRI (and its conceptual predecessors, like ‘science in society’), including Engage2020 and PE2020  Funding agencies o RRI-focused programmes and funding (such as the Netherlands’ NWO “Responsible Innovation” programme) o Programmes supporting engagement strategies, including BBSRC o CORDIS (EU projects)  Organisations dedicated to societal engagement o Collaborations between researchers and Civil Society Organisations (e.g., ‘SynBioWatch’, funded by SYNENERGENE) o Public engagement initiatives (such as the ‘Science Shop’ at Queen’s University Belfast)  Citizen science platforms (initiatives such as ‘Observatree’)  Research within the respective PROSO domain (Bioeconomy, Nanotechnology, Food & Health), including informal interviews with key figures doing societal engagement in science  Exploratory informal interviews with prominent CSOs  Major research and innovation activities o Funding programmes (e.g. 7th Framework Programme) o Major research networks across a range of European countries (e.g. Northern Periphery Programme)
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Case Study Selection Methodology

  • Selection Criteria Each Contract is secured by a new or used Motorcycle. No Contract has a Contract Rate less than 1.00%. Each Contract amortizes the amount financed over an original term no greater than 84 months (excluding periods of deferral of first payment). Each Contract has a Principal Balance of at least $500.00 as of the Cutoff Date.

  • Claims Review Methodology a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject to the Quarterly Claims Review.‌

  • Supplier Selection If Customer selects a seat or galley supplier that is not on the Boeing recommended list, such seat or galley will become BFE and the provisions of Exhibit A, Buyer Furnished Equipment Provisions Document, of the AGTA will apply.

  • Single Source Selection Services for tasks in circumstances which meet the requirements of paragraph 3.10 of the Consultant Guidelines for Single Source Selection, may, with the Association's prior agreement, be procured in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 3.9 through 3.13 of the Consultant Guidelines.

  • Selection Procedure 10.2.4.1 Internal applicants shall be defined as all applicants with seniority in accordance with Article 12.5.

  • Loop Testing/Trouble Reporting 2.1.6.1 TeleConex will be responsible for testing and isolating troubles on the Loops. TeleConex must test and isolate trouble to the BellSouth portion of a designed/non-designed unbundled Loop (e.g., UVL-SL2, UCL-D, UVL-SL1, UCL-ND, etc.) before reporting repair to the UNE Customer Wholesale Interconnection Network Services (CWINS) Center. Upon request from BellSouth at the time of the trouble report, TeleConex will be required to provide the results of the TeleConex test which indicate a problem on the BellSouth provided Loop.

  • Selection Process The Mortgage Loans were selected from among the outstanding one- to four-family mortgage loans in the Seller's portfolio at the related Closing Date as to which the representations and warranties set forth in Subsection 9.02 could be made and such selection was not made in a manner so as to affect adversely the interests of the Purchaser;

  • Quality-based Selection Services for assignments which the Bank agrees meet the requirements set forth in paragraph 3.2 of the Consultant Guidelines may be procured under contracts awarded on the basis of Quality-based Selection in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 3.1 through 3.4 of the Consultant Guidelines.

  • Random Drug Testing All employees covered by this Agreement shall be subject to random drug testing in accordance with Appendix D.

  • Conformity Assessment Procedures 1. The Parties recognise that a broad range of mechanisms exist to facilitate the acceptance of conformity assessment results, including:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.