According to Xx. X’Xxxxx palliative care can assist in allowing the plaintiff to die in her own bed, in her own home and surrounded by her family. It can afford her the possibility of dying with dignity in a peaceful and gentle way. When death is expected within quite a short period of time the Irish Hospice Foundation will fund a nurse to attend to that patient overnight for a period of up to 14 nights. This is designed to give an additional layer of support, comfort and reassurance to family members and to others assisting in the care of such a person at home.
According to Xx. X’Xxxxx the idea that the plaintiff would become unable to communicate but would nevertheless remain conscious would not be a likely occurrence as she would most likely succumb to respiratory sepsis. The risk of speech function being lost while swallowing and respiratory functions continue is unlikely as typically they decline roughly in parallel. Further, where patients lose the ability to speak that there are other ways in which they can communicate their needs very efficiently and effectively. Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxx
According to Xx. Xxxxxxx, there was nothing on the file stating that after the agreement of the final account was made, there was an oral agreement entered into by the employees of UDeCOTT and Dipcon for payment of any further sum.
According to Xx. Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx, Director of Enrollment Services with the Emory’s RSPH, the RSPH considered students to be second-year if they had earned 18 credit hours. According to Xx. Xxxxxxxx, there were approximately 564 second-year students enrolled in the RSPH at the time of the study.
According to Xx. Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Head of Term Funding and Money Markets with Ulster Bank Ireland DAC, two of the plaintiff’s loans (nos. 3704 and 3908) were sold by Ulster Bank Ireland Limited to the sixth defendant. This was done by way of securitisation, whereby the legal title to the loans remained with Ulster Bank Ireland Limited (now Ulster Bank Ireland DAC). That mortgage sale agreement was dated 20th November, 2008.
According to Xx. Xxxxx, Xxxxxx was in pain during the ride home. Shortly after arriving home, Xxxxxx died.
According to Xx. Xxxxxxx S.C., the situation was, to the Chief Justice’s mind, urgent. An urgent solution was needed. That was the reason for the emergency meeting of the JLSC on 27th April 2017. And the JLSC wanted urgent action.
According to Xx. Xxxxx, the DPH Summary also did not qualify as secondary evidence within the meaning of section 43 as it did not fit into any of the categories of document listed in the section and furthermore, the maker of the Summary had not been not called to give an oral account of the circumstances surrounding how, when or why the Summary had been generated. According, to Xx. Xxxxx, the learned judge was therefore correct to find as he did at paragraphs 52 through 54 of his Judgment that the Summary was hearsay and inadmissible.
According to Xx. Xxxxxxx, the Deceased’s pension commenced in November 2006 and at the time of her death her last monthly pension was $939.76. In accordance with its pension policy the Claimant now receives 50% of the monthly pension payment ($469.88) until his death.
According to Xx. Xxxxxx, Xx. Xxxxxxx was visibly upset at this time and was rocking back and forth and making high pitched squeals. Further, he alternated between expressing his desire not to vote and a desire to vote. Xx. Xxxx indicated that he never witnessed Xx. Xxxxxxx so agitated. To which, the Respondent responded "[t]hat's because you never pressed him."
