Examples of Litigation Class in a sentence
This approach is even more compelling in a case such as this one, which involves a potential class of nearly 11 million people and thus will involve significant time and expense in class notification.B. Settlement Class Versus Litigation Class To certify either a settlement class or a litigation class, the requirements of Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure must be satisfied.
If a court of competent jurisdiction determines that all or part of this Litigation Class Action Waiver is unenforceable, unconscionable, void or voidable, the remainder of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
Identifying every putative class action filed during 2009 would be impracticable—not least without extensive resources and staff support.75 We instead used two commercial publications—the BNA Class Action Litigation Reporter and the Mealey’s Litigation Class Action Reporter—to identify cases for inclusion in the study.
A trial involving those parties that have not settled is scheduled for February 2, 2016.After I issued an Order certifying the Direct Purchaser Litigation Class, Mylan and Ranbaxy were successful in obtaining Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f) review of this Order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Mylan and Ranbaxy provide no convincing explanation as to how the Third Circuit’s resolution of whether the Direct Purchaser Litigation Class was properly certified could impact a trial involving non-class claims brought by Apotex or the Individual Plaintiffs.
The Individual Plaintiffs are owners and operators of retail pharmacies who have filed their own separate actions and are excluded from the definition of the Direct Purchaser Litigation Class.
I previously rejected the applicability of this case in my opinion certifying the Direct Purchaser Litigation Class.
Instead, the End-Payor Plaintiffs requested that their case be stayed pending a decision from the Third Circuit on their Rule 23(f) petition filed in connection with the Order denying certification of the End-Payor Litigation Class.
Mylan and Ranbaxy have now requested that I stay all proceedings before me pending the Third Circuit’s interlocutory review of the Order certifying the Direct Purchaser Litigation Class.
On the other hand, Mylan and Ranbaxy’s appeal of theDirect Purchaser Litigation Class certification Order raises an arguably novel question of law concerning Supreme Court precedent – i.e. “the Comcast issue.”6 However, while the “Comcastissue” may be novel, as discussed extensively infra, I do not believe that Mylan and Ranbaxy’s argument is correct as a matter of law or fact.