Trading Performance Sample Clauses

Trading Performance. The ION NZ operations continue to operate well with only minor production interruptions, although recent performance has been adversely affected by poor vehicle sales for some models it supplies. Detailed financial forecasts for the ION NZ operations have been prepared, and the Administrators are monitoring the performance of those operations by comparison to forecast. The Administrators do not anticipate there are substantial profit improvement gains to be derived from efficiency improvements or cost savings, prior to a sale in the absence of significant expenditure. The ION NZ operations' recent trading performance (1 December 2004 to 28 February 2005) is detailed below. Operating Results - ION NZ Total 1 December 2004 - 28 February 2005 AUD 000's Sales 27,705 Gross Margin 5,983 Depreciation and Amortisation 1,361 Operating EBITDA 3,080 Administration costs (196) Restructuring 0 EBITDA 2,884 Movement in working capital (10,349) Trading Cashflow (7,465) Capital Expenditure & Research and Development (1,980) Operating Cashflow (9,445) Operating cashflow has been impacted by accelerated payment terms required by Comalco following the appointment of Administrators to the ION Administration Group. These revised trading terms will continue to impact the business unit’s operating cashflow unless the Comalco terms are revised. Funding of AUD $9.95 million has been provided by ION Limited during the reporting period to accommodate the revised Comalco trading terms. This funding by the Administrators was provided under a secured facility. Some unfavourable sales and EBITDA variances were experienced during the reporting period due to production problems caused by tool breakages which impacted on drilling cycle times. Non-essential capital expenditure has been deferred pending a possible sale of the business unit and the Administrators anticipate that the business unit will maintain a positive EBITDA to June 2005.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Trading Performance. The ION US operations' management accounts for the period from 1 December 2004 to 28 February 2005 are summarised below: Operating Results - ION US 1 December 2004 - 28 February 2005 Total AUD 000's Sales Gross Margin Depreciation and Amortisation Operating EBITDA 48 (154) Administration costs Restructuring EBITDA Movement in working capital Trading Cashflow Capital Expenditure & Research and Development Operating Cashflow (196) 0 (350) (179) (529) (12,239) (12,768) The project was put on hold by the Administrators on 7 December 2004 and works recommenced in early February 2005 pursuant to the Administrators’ decision to fund the project. Capital expenditure during the period is in line with forecasts upon which the Administrators’ funding decision was based. 9 Sale process The Administrators’ strategy has been to maximise returns to creditors by pursuing sales of ION Consolidated Group’s operations on a going concern basis, where those operations are viable. Given the extent of losses which have been incurred, the need for additional capital, and the necessity of maintaining the confidence of customers and suppliers, it is not feasible to re-organise creditor claims and restore solvency without disturbing the existing ownership of ION Limited, In short, the salvageable operations within ION Consolidated Group need new owners who can provide adequate financial and technical resources to secure their long term future. The ION Energy Services Group was sold by the Administrators as a going concern on 25 January 2005. The Administrators commenced a sale process for the businesses of the ION Automotive Group in January 2005 appointing CSFB as their advisors in this sale process. CSFB were chosen from a number of candidates based on their global reach and experience in the automotive sector, both of which were considered important qualifications. With the co-operation of the directors and management of ION NZ and ION US the sale process also includes the operations of those entities.

Related to Trading Performance

  • EVALUATING PERFORMANCE 6.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) to this Agreement sets out -

  • Software Performance HP warrants that its branded software products will conform materially to their specifications and be free of malware at the time of delivery. HP warranties for software products will begin on the date of delivery and unless otherwise specified in Supporting Material, will last for ninety (90) days. HP does not warrant that the operation of software products will be uninterrupted or error-free or that software products will operate in hardware and software combinations other than as authorized by HP in Supporting Material.

  • Service Performance All Services provided by the Agency shall be performed in a diligent, safe, courteous, and timely manner in accordance with this Contract and the Associated federal requirements.

  • Full Performance The Owner and the Contractor hereby agree to the full performance of the Contract Documents.

  • Continuing Performance Each party is required to continue to perform its obligations under this contract pending final resolution of any dispute arising out of or relating to this contract, unless to do so would be impossible or impracticable under the circumstances.

  • REGISTRY PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS

  • Excused Performance 6.1 Notwithstanding the occurrence of a Force Majeure Event, in which case Clause 17 will govern, BT will not be liable for any failure or delay to perform any of its obligations under this Agreement (including any of its obligations to meet any Service Levels) to the extent that BT’s failure or delay in performing arises as a result of:

  • Excuse from Performance The Parties shall be excused from performing their respective obligations hereunder if they are prevented from so performing by reason of floods, earthquakes, other acts of nature, war, civil insurrection, riots, acts of any government (including judicial action), and other similar catastrophic events which are beyond the control of and not the fault of the Party claiming excuse from performance hereunder. Labor unrest, including but not limited to strike, work stoppage or slowdown, sick-out, picketing, or other concerted job action conducted by Contractor's employees or directed at Contractor is not an excuse from performance and Contractor shall be obligated to continue to provide service notwithstanding the occurrence of any or all of such events. The Party claiming excuse from performance shall, within two (2) Business Days after such Party has notice of such cause, give the other Party notice of the facts constituting such cause and asserting its claim to excuse under this Section. If either Party validly exercises its rights under this Section, the Parties hereby waive any claim against each other for any damages sustained thereby. The partial or complete interruption or discontinuance of Contractor's services caused by one or more of the events described in this Section shall not constitute a default by Contractor under this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, if Contractor is excused from performing its obligations hereunder for any of the causes listed in this Section for a period of thirty (30) calendar days or more, the SCWMA shall nevertheless have the right, in its sole discretion, to terminate this Agreement by giving ten (10) calendar days notice to Contractor unless Contractor has demonstrated, by the thirtieth (30th) calendar day, to the satisfaction of the SCWMA that the Contractor will resume services no later than the sixtieth (60th) day following the date service was interrupted or discontinued by Contractor.

  • Work Performance All work in performance of this Lease shall be done by skilled workers or mechanics and shall be acceptable to the RECO. The RECO may reject the Lessor’s workers 1) if such are unlicensed, unskilled, or otherwise incompetent, or 2) if such have demonstrated a history of either untimely or otherwise unacceptable performance in connection with work carried out in conjunction with either this contract or other Government or private contracts.

  • School Performance The School shall achieve an accountability designation of Good Standing or Honor on each of the three sections of the Performance Framework. In the event the School is a party to a third party management contract which includes a deficit protection clause, the School shall be exempt from some or all measures within the financial portion of the Performance Framework. In accordance with Charter School Law, the Authorizer shall renew any charter in which the public charter school met all of the terms of its performance certificate at the time of renewal.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.