Tenured Faculty Evaluation Sample Clauses

The Tenured Faculty Evaluation clause establishes the process and criteria for regularly assessing the performance of faculty members who have achieved tenure. Typically, this clause outlines the frequency of evaluations, the standards or benchmarks used, and the procedures for review, which may include peer assessments, student feedback, and documentation of teaching, research, and service. Its core function is to ensure that tenured faculty continue to meet institutional expectations and maintain high professional standards, thereby promoting accountability and ongoing professional development.
Tenured Faculty Evaluation. The evaluation process will be conducted with all professors who are tenured or in a non-tenure track. After a professor is no longer in a probationary status, they will move into the professor evaluation cycle starting with the first year subsequent to being awarded tenure. If a professor is not in a tenure track, the evaluation cycle will begin with the first year of full-time employment. Full-time Tenured Professors who choose to teach additional courses as an overload assignment will have the assignment included as part of the tenure appraisal process. Evaluations are based on multiple indices and include administrative, student, peer, and self-evaluations. In keeping with the mission of the College, the goal of the evaluation process is to improve the abilities and skills of professors through immediate feedback, support and recommendation. To achieve this goal the evaluation process will do the following: maintain a positive learning environment for students; insure professors remain competent/knowledgeable in their fields; retain faculty through intervention, assistance and guidance; acknowledge effective forms of instructional delivery; and provide immediate feedback to professors.
View SourceView Similar (11)
Tenured Faculty Evaluation. The tenured faculty evaluation process is designed to improve the teaching/ learning process and delivery of student services, to provide a basis for professional growth and development, and to comply with California State Community College laws and regulations. A. Two-Step Process 1. Student Evaluation a. Student evaluations will be arranged through the appropriate Vice President’s office, and be obtained in each class, or for those faculty who engage in instruction outside of the traditional classroom, in the equivalent of a class, per year during the time covered by this evaluation period. b. These student evaluations will be made available for the faculty member to review. c. The student evaluations are the property of the faculty member, and will be returned to the faculty member at the end of the semester, and the information contained therein will not be retained by the college or the district, used by the administration in the completion of the formal evaluation, or included in the faculty member’s personnel file.
View SourceView Similar (5)
Tenured Faculty Evaluation. The tenured faculty evaluation process is designed to improve the teaching/ learning process and delivery of student services, to provide a basis for professional growth and development, and to comply with California State Community College laws and regulations. A. Tenured Faculty Evaluation Process 1. Self-evaluation a. The faculty member will submit to the ▇▇▇▇ a portfolio including a report of college, District or committee service; accomplishments (such as publications, shows or performances) awards and achievements; appropriate class materials such as sample syllabi and assignments; and other pertinent documents. 2. Instructional activity observation a. The appropriate ▇▇▇▇, or designee will make scheduled classroom/worksite/electronic visits as described below: i. The faculty member and ▇▇▇▇ or designee will mutually agree on the course(s) or equivalent in which the scheduled evaluation(s) will take place, so that the faculty member may be observed under optimum conditions displaying his/her abilities. ii. Each evaluation shall include at least one (1) observation, lasting at least fifty (50) minutes. For on-line classes, the faculty member will present the course to the evaluator during an observation lasting at least fifty (50) minutes. 3. Student Evaluation a. Student evaluations will be arranged through the appropriate ▇▇▇▇’▇ office, and be conducted in each class during the fall and spring semesters, or for those faculty members who engage in instruction outside of the traditional classroom, in the equivalent of a class, during the academic year in which the evaluation is conducted. b. These student evaluations will be made available for the faculty member to review. c. The student evaluations are the property of the faculty member, and will be returned to the faculty member at the end of the semester, and the information contained therein will not be retained by the college or the district, used by the administration in the completion of the formal evaluation, or included in the faculty member’s personnel file. 4. Report preparation a. The ▇▇▇▇ will complete a Faculty Performance Evaluation report, including a recommendation of continued employment, based upon: i. the materials from the faculty portfolio; ii. results of observations; iii. items relevant to the instructional duties assigned to the faculty member, including adherence to Board Policy and college processes and deadlines; iv. a review of activities which are outside of the instructi...
View SourceView Similar (4)
Tenured Faculty Evaluation. The tenured faculty evaluation process is designed to improve the teaching and learning process and delivery of student services, to provide a basis for professional growth and development, and to comply with California State Community College laws and regulations. a. Tenured Faculty Evaluation Process (1) Self-Evaluation The faculty member will submit to the ▇▇▇▇ a portfolio including a report of college, District or committee service; accomplishments (such as publications, shows or performances); awards and achievements; 2768 appropriate class materials such as sample syllabi and assignments; and 2769 other pertinent documents. 2770 (2) Instructional Activity Observation 2772 2773 The appropriate ▇▇▇▇, or designee will make scheduled 2774 classroom/worksite/electronic visits as described below: 2775 (a) The faculty member and ▇▇▇▇ or designee will mutually agree on 2777 the course(s) or equivalent in which the scheduled observation(s) 2778 will take place, so that the faculty member may be observed under 2779 optimum conditions displaying their abilities. 2780 2781 (b) Each evaluation shall include at least one (1) observation, lasting at 2782 least fifty (50) minutes. For on-line classes, the faculty member 2783 will present the course to the evaluator during an observation 2784 lasting at least fifty (50) minutes. 2785 (3) Student Evaluations 2787 2788 (a) Student evaluations will be conducted in all classes during the 2789 semester in which a formal evaluation is performed. 2790 2791 Student evaluations are to be initiated prior to November 1 for the 2792 fall semester and prior to April 1 for the spring semester for full 2793 term and 1st 8-week classes and by December 1 and May 1 for late 2794 start and 2nd 8-week classes. 2795 2796 (b) For those faculty members who engage in instruction outside of the 2797 classroom, including librarians, counselors, and learning disability 2798 specialists, student evaluations will be collected within five (5) 2799 days of student contact sessions (i.e., student appointments or 2800 reference desk visits) during a selected month during the semester 2801 in which a formal evaluation is performed. 2802 2803 (c) These student evaluations will be made available for the faculty 2804 member and one tenured faculty member serving as a peer 2805 reviewer from the department or division/school, or from a related 2806 department or division/school selected by the evaluate, following 2807 the due dates for grades. The select...
View SourceView Similar (4)
Tenured Faculty Evaluation. Tenured Faculty Evaluation A. Post-Tenure Reflection Process 1. Post-Tenure Reflection Process Schedule
View SourceView Similar (3)
Tenured Faculty Evaluation. The tenured faculty evaluation process is designed to improve the teaching/ learning process and delivery of student services, to provide a basis for professional growth and development, and to comply with California State Community College laws and regulations.
View Source
Tenured Faculty Evaluation. The tenured faculty evaluation process is designed to improve the teaching/ learning process and delivery of student services, to provide a basis for professional growth and development, and to comply with California State Community College laws and regulations.
View Source

Related to Tenured Faculty Evaluation

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP ▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • MANAGEMENT OF EVALUATION OUTCOMES 12.1 Where the Employer is, any time during the Employee’s employment, not satisfied with the Employee’s performance with respect to any matter dealt with in this Agreement, the Employer will give notice to the Employee to attend a meeting; 12.2 The Employee will have the opportunity at the meeting to satisfy the Employer of the measures being taken to ensure that his performance becomes satisfactory and any programme, including any dates, for implementing these measures; 12.3 Where there is a dispute or difference as to the performance of the Employee under this Agreement, the Parties will confer with a view to resolving the dispute or difference; and 12.4 In the case of unacceptable performance, the Employer shall – 12.4.1 Provide systematic remedial or developmental support to assist the Employee to improve his performance; and 12.4.2 After appropriate performance counselling and having provided the necessary guidance and/or support as well as reasonable time for improvement in performance, the Employer may consider steps to terminate the contract of employment of the Employee on grounds of unfitness or incapacity to carry out his or her duties.