Reimbursement of Davia’s Fees and Costs. The Parties acknowledge that Davia and her counsel offered to resolve this dispute without reaching terms on the amount of fees and costs to be reimbursed to them, thereby leaving this fee issue to be resolved after the material terms of the agreement had been settled. PEM then expressed a desire to resolve the fee and cost issue shortly after the other settlement terms had been finalized. The Parties then attempted to (and did) reach an accord on the compensation due to Davia and her counsel under general contract principles and the private attorney general doctrine codified at California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, for all work performed in this matter, except fees that may be incurred on appeal. Under these legal principles, PEM shall cause to be paid to Davia’s counsel the amount of $29,000 for fees and costs incurred investigating, litigating and enforcing this matter. Such payment shall be made payable to “Xxxxxxx Law Firm”.
Reimbursement of Davia’s Fees and Costs. The Parties acknowledge that Davia and her counsel refused to consider any reimbursement of plaintiff’s fees or costs until all other terms of the settlement were reached. The Parties then reached an accord on the reimbursement due to Davia and compensation of her counsel under general contract principles and consistent with the private attorney general doctrine codified at California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, in the amount of $33,000 for fees and costs incurred investigating and negotiating a resolution of this matter. Such payment shall be made payable to “Xxxxxxx Law Firm”.
Reimbursement of Davia’s Fees and Costs. The Parties acknowledge that Davia and her counsel offered to resolve this dispute without reaching terms on the amount of fees and costs to be reimbursed to them, thereby leaving this fee issue to be resolved after the material terms of the agreement had been settled. Wellsco then expressed a desire to resolve the fee and cost issue shortly after the other settlement terms had been finalized. The Parties then attempted to (and did) reach an accord on the compensation due to Davia and her counsel under general contract principles and the private attorney general doctrine codified at California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, for all work performed in this matter, except fees that may be incurred on appeal. Under these legal principles, Wellsco International Group, Co., Ltd. shall pay, pursuant to the procedures of Section 4.4 the amount of $40,000 for fees and costs incurred investigating, litigating and enforcing this matter.
Reimbursement of Davia’s Fees and Costs. The Parties acknowledge that Davia and her counsel offered to resolve this dispute without reaching terms on the amount of fees and costs to be reimbursed to them, thereby leaving this fee issue to be resolved after the material terms of the agreement had been settled. The Parties then attempted to (and did) reach an accord on the compensation due to Davia and her counsel under general contract principles and the private attorney general doctrine codified at California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, for all work performed in this matter, except fees that may be incurred on appeal. Under these legal principles, on behalf of the Settling Sellers Trends shall cause to be paid to Davia’s counsel the amount of $25,000 for fees and costs, incurred investigating, litigating and enforcing this matter. Such payment shall be made payable to “Xxxxxxx Law Firm”.
Reimbursement of Davia’s Fees and Costs. The Parties acknowledge that Davia and her counsel offered to resolve this dispute without reaching terms on the amount of fees and costs to be reimbursed to them, thereby leaving this fee issue to be resolved after the material terms of the agreement had been settled. Madden expressed a desire to resolve the fee and cost issue shortly after the other settlement terms had been finalized. The Parties then attempted to (and did) reach an accord on the compensation due to Davia and her counsel under general contract principles and the private attorney general doctrine codified at California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, for all work performed in this matter, except fees that may be incurred on appeal. Under these legal principles, Madden shall pay Davia’s counsel the amount of $19,000 for fees and costs incurred investigating, litigating and enforcing this matter.
Reimbursement of Davia’s Fees and Costs. The Parties acknowledge that Davia and her counsel offered to resolve this dispute without reaching terms on the amount of fees and costs to be reimbursed to them, thereby leaving this fee issue to be resolved after the material terms of the agreement had been settled. Pacific World expressed a desire to resolve the fee and cost issue shortly after the other settlement terms had been finalized. The Parties then attempted to (and did) reach an accord on the compensation due to Davia and her counsel under general contract principles and the private attorney general doctrine codified at California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, for all work performed in this matter. Under these legal principles, Pacific World shall pay Davia’s counsel the amount of $29,000 for all fees and costs incurred investigating, litigating and enforcing this matter.
Reimbursement of Davia’s Fees and Costs. The Parties acknowledge that Davia and her counsel offered to resolve this dispute without reaching terms on the amount of fees and costs to be reimbursed to them, thereby leaving this fee issue to be resolved after the material terms of the agreement had been settled. Container Store then expressed a desire to resolve the fee and cost issue shortly after the other settlement terms had been finalized. The Parties then attempted to (and did) reach an accord on the compensation due to Davia and her counsel under general contract principles and the private attorney general doctrine codified at California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, for all work performed in this matter. Under these legal principles, Container Store shall pay Davia’s counsel the amount of $35,137 for fees and costs incurred investigating, litigating and enforcing this matter.
Reimbursement of Davia’s Fees and Costs. The Parties acknowledge that Davia and her counsel offered to resolve this dispute without reaching terms on the amount of fees and costs to be reimbursed to them, thereby leaving this fee issue to be resolved after the material terms of the agreement had been settled. Sunham then expressed a desire to resolve the fee and cost issue shortly after the other settlement terms had been finalized. The Parties then attempted to (and did) reach an accord on the compensation due to Davia and her counsel under general contract principles and the private attorney general doctrine codified at California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, for all work performed in this matter. Under these legal principles, Sunham shall cause to be paid to Davia’s counsel the amount of $31,000.00 for fees and costs incurred investigating, litigating and enforcing this matter. Such payment shall be made payable to “Xxxxxxx Law Firm”.
Reimbursement of Davia’s Fees and Costs. The Parties acknowledge that Davia and her counsel offered to resolve this dispute without reaching terms on the amount of fees and costs to be reimbursed to them, thereby leaving this fee issue to be resolved after the non-monetary terms of the agreement had been settled. The Parties then attempted to (and did) reach an accord on the compensation due to Davia and her counsel under the principles of California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5 and 11 C.C.R. § 3201, for all work performed in this matter. Under these legal principles, Fire Mountain shall pay Davia’s counsel the amount of $22,750 for fees and costs incurred investigating, litigating and enforcing this matter.
Reimbursement of Davia’s Fees and Costs. The Parties acknowledge that Davia and her counsel offered to resolve this dispute without reaching terms on the amount of fees and costs to be reimbursed to them, thereby leaving this fee issue to be resolved after the material terms of the agreement had been settled. Earth Pak then expressed a desire to resolve the fee and cost issue shortly after the other settlement terms had been finalized. The Parties then attempted to (and did) reach an accord on the compensation due to Davia and her counsel under general contract principles and the private attorney general doctrine codified at California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, for all work performed in this matter, except fees that may be incurred on appeal. Under these legal principles, Earth Pak shall cause to be paid to Davia’s counsel the amount of $20,933.58 for fees and costs incurred investigating, litigating and enforcing this matter. Such payment shall be made payable to “Xxxxxxx Law Firm”.
