Quality of Service targets Sample Clauses

Quality of Service targets. For each of the indicators mentioned under II.2.1-A, the targets set for Aéroports de Paris SA over the periods defined hereinafter are as follows: Type Indicators 2016 0000 0000 0000 0000 Quality standard: DEE 95.00% 95.25% 95.50% 95.75% 96.00% DTB 98.00% 98.00% 98.00% 98.00% 98.00% DPS 94.00% 94.25% 94.50% 94.75% 95.00% DPT 95.00% 95.25% 95.50% 95.75% 96.00% D4H 97.00% 97.00% 97.00% 97.00% 97.00% SPR 3.88 3.90 3.91 3.93 4.05 SQR 3.71 3.73 3.75 3.76 3.87 Excellence SFC 3.51 3.52 3.53 3.55 3.57 SGD 3.66 3.67 3.68 3.70 3.73 SGA 91.00% 91.25% 91.50% 91.75% 92.00% For the purposes of the present article, the period "n" as mentioned in the table above relates to the period running from 1 July of the previous year, i.e. "n-1", to 30 June of the current year "n". However, regarding the availability indicators (DEE, DTB, DPS, DPT, D4H), the period 2016 as mentioned in the table above relates to the period running from 1 January to 30 June, 2016. Considering the new method of calculation for availability indicators and the ensuing uncertainty over their initial level, a review clause for targets will be generated for each indicator whenever the first year results are outside the median values between targets and the lower and upper limits defined for one and the same period. Furthermore, in cases where the maximum bonus/penalty for a given indicator is applied two years running, the latter's target level will also be reviewed. The definitions and methods of review clauses for the indicators mentioned under II.2.1-A are given in Appendix 5. Pricing
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Quality of Service targets. RingCentral will maintain an average MOS score of 3.8 over each calendar month for Customer Sites in the Territory, except to the extent that Customer endpoints connect via public WiFi, a low bandwidth mobile data connection (3G or lower), or Customer uses of narrowband codecs such as G.729.

Related to Quality of Service targets

  • Quality of Service Contractor shall perform its services with care, skill, and diligence, in accordance with the applicable professional standards currently recognized by such profession, and shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, completeness, and coordination of all reports, designs, drawings, plans, information, specifications, and/or other items and services furnished under this Agreement. Contractor shall, without additional compensation, correct or revise any errors or deficiencies immediately upon discovery in its reports, drawings, specifications, designs, and/or other related items or services.

  • Quality of Services (a) The Consultant shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, and the coordination of all designs, drawings, specifications, and other services furnished pursuant to this Agreement.

  • Performance Targets Threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance measure of the performance period are contained in Appendix B.

  • Originality of Services Except as to standard generic details, Consultant agrees that all technologies, formulae, procedures, processes, methods, writings, ideas, dialogue, compositions, recordings, teleplays and video productions prepared for, written for, or submitted to the District and/or used in connection with this Agreement, shall be wholly original to Consultant and shall not be copied in whole or in part from any other source, except that submitted to Consultant by District as a basis for such services.

  • PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES 4.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) sets out-

  • Targets and Milestones You may choose to develop specific additional targets and milestones which assess your performance in ITT over time – particularly if ITT trainees make up a significant proportion of your overall student body. Alternatively, you may have targets and milestones in your existing 2012-13 access agreement which you now also wish to apply to undergraduate and/or postgraduate ITT trainees. These targets may be statistical – based on how representative your entrants are and/or your retention performance – and might include annual or interim milestones to help you monitor whether you are making progress. You may wish to include criteria around the numbers of trainees in receipt of a full or partial maintenance grant, as financial data will need to be collected to determine bursary support and the data will also be accessible through the Student Loans Company for HEBSS subscribers. You may also wish to consider the TDA guidance at Annex C which gives information on specific groups that are Annex A underrepresented in the teaching profession. In this section, please state whether you intend to develop additional targets and milestones, or the extent to which you intend to use targets and milestones in your existing agreement which you now wish to extend to apply to undergraduate and/or postgraduate ITT trainees. Where you have new or amended milestones and targets, you should set these out in your Excel template (Annex B) at Table 6. The University of Cambridge does not intend to adjust its current targets or to develop additional targets and milestones for its ITT provision. The number of students on the PGCE programme amount to less than 4% of the total population of Cambridge students with which the Office for Fair Access is concerned, and all of those students have already experienced a first taste of higher education. It would therefore be disproportionate to set specific aims and objectives for this group.

  • Service Objectives D4.1 The Services will:

  • Performance of Service 2.1 Appendix A (General Provisions), Articles 1 through 16, governs the performance of services under this contract. 2.2 Appendix B sets forth the liability and insurance provisions of this contract. 2.3 Appendix C sets forth the services to be performed by the contractor. ARTICLE 3.

  • Selection Criteria for Awarding Task Order The Government will award to the offeror whose proposal is deemed most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment using the evaluation criteria. The Government will evaluate proposals against established selection criteria specified in the task order RFP. Generally, the Government's award decision will be based on selection criteria which addresses past performance, technical acceptability, proposal risk and cost. Among other sources, evaluation of past performance may be based on past performance assessments provided by TO Program Managers on individual task orders performed throughout the life of the contract. The order of importance for the factors will be identified in the RFP for the specified task order.

  • Performance Schedule The Parties will perform their respective responsibilities in accordance with the Performance Schedule. By executing this Agreement, Customer authorizes Motorola to proceed with contract performance.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.