Pre-judgment Violation Sample Clauses

Pre-judgment Violation. Should the provisions of this Settlement Agreement be violated by any party or should any party believe that any of the Parties (or other person making such covenant) has breached its, his or her covenants hereunder, then upon notice by a non-breaching party to the party or person in breach and to all Parties to this Agreement, the Parties consent to the Court’s jurisdiction and authority to hold a hearing to determine whether such breach occurred, and, if so, the appropriate remedy for such breach, which may include, but not be limited to, sanctions, fines, damages, equitable relief and in the event of a knowing, willful and material breach, the Parties acknowledge and agree that the Court may enter an order of contempt; and if the Court determines that such breach violates the essence of this Settlement Agreement so as to defeat its purpose, the Court may void this Settlement Agreement and this Settlement Agreement shall then terminate and be of no further force and effect, the Parties shall cause to be filed a motion to terminate the class action; in such event the Lawsuits shall continue as non-class action suits.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Pre-judgment Violation

  • ALLEGED VIOLATIONS ‌ At its discretion, NRMP will investigate alleged violations of this Agreement, including but not limited to:

  • Repeat Violations Xxxxxxx agrees to comply with all regulatory requirements and acknowledges that repeat violations could result in increased penalties in the future.

  • Notice of Violation On or about August 8, 2020, October 30, 2020, April 29, 2021 and July 21, 2022, Xxxxxxx served Xxxxxx.xxx, Inc. and certain requisite public enforcement agencies with 60- Day Notices of Violation (notice), alleging that Xxxxxx.xxx, Inc. violated Proposition 65 when it failed to warn customers or consumers in California that the Products expose users to lead. To the best of the Parties’ knowledge, no public enforcer has commenced and is diligently prosecuting the allegations set forth in the notice.

  • LAW APPLICABLE AND COMPETENT COURT 6.1 The Agreement is governed by [insert the national law of the NA].

  • Termination Due To Lack Of Funding Appropriation If, in the judgment of the Director of Accounts and Reports, Department of Administration, sufficient funds are not appropriated to continue the function performed in this agreement and for the payment of the charges hereunder, State may terminate this agreement at the end of its current fiscal year. State agrees to give written notice of termination to contractor at least 30 days prior to the end of its current fiscal year, and shall give such notice for a greater period prior to the end of such fiscal year as may be provided in this contract, except that such notice shall not be required prior to 90 days before the end of such fiscal year. Contractor shall have the right, at the end of such fiscal year, to take possession of any equipment provided State under the contract. State will pay to the contractor all regular contractual payments incurred through the end of such fiscal year, plus contractual charges incidental to the return of any such equipment. Upon termination of the agreement by State, title to any such equipment shall revert to contractor at the end of the State's current fiscal year. The termination of the contract pursuant to this paragraph shall not cause any penalty to be charged to the agency or the contractor.

  • Disaster Relief Contract Violation Under Sections 2155.006 and 2261.053 of the Texas Government Code, PSP certifies that the individual or business entity named in the response or Agreement is not ineligible to receive the specified Agreement and acknowledges that this Agreement may be terminated and payment withheld if this certification is inaccurate.

  • Retainage for Unacceptable Corrective Action Plan or Plan Failure If the corrective action plan is unacceptable to the Department or Customer, or implementation of the plan fails to remedy the performance deficiencies, the Department or Customer will retain ten percent (10%) of the total invoice amount. The retainage will be withheld until the Contractor resolves the performance deficiencies. If the performance deficiencies are resolved, the Contractor may invoice the Department or Customer for the retained amount. If the Contractor fails to resolve the performance deficiencies, the retained amount will be forfeited to compensate the Department or Customer for the performance deficiencies.

  • Third Party Antitrust Violations The Subrecipient hereby assigns to the State of Arizona any claim for overcharges resulting from antitrust violations to the extent that such violations concern materials or services supplied by third parties to Subrecipient toward fulfillment of this Agreement.

  • Reportable Events Involving the Xxxxx Law Notwithstanding the reporting requirements outlined above, any Reportable Event that involves solely a probable violation of section 1877 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §1395nn (the Xxxxx Law) should be submitted by Practitioner to CMS through the self-referral disclosure protocol (SRDP), with a copy to the OIG. If Practitioner identifies a probable violation of the Xxxxx Law and repays the applicable Overpayment directly to the CMS contractor, then Practitioner is not required by this Section III.G to submit the Reportable Event to CMS through the SRDP.

  • Waiver of Appellate and Post-Conviction Rights a. The defendant acknowledges, understands and agrees that by pleading guilty pursuant to this plea agreement he waives his right to appeal or collaterally attack a finding of guilt following the acceptance of this plea agreement, except on grounds of (1) ineffective assistance of counsel; or (2) prosecutorial misconduct.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.