OIP Table Sample Clauses

OIP Table. Measure Performance Target Measurement Period Data Source PMPM Component Payment Members Measured Leapfrog Initiative Participation 85% of elective admissions at hospital self-reported on Leapfrog website 12 month period ending six months prior to month of payout Leapfrog website $ .1258 All Commercial and Secure Horizons assigned to PMG CABG volume threshold (per PHS TAG threshold), combined with CCMRP risk-adjusted CABG outcomes 85% of CABG admissions at qualifying hospitals with >100 CABGs in latest reported year (or per latest OSHPD data available) AND NOT CCMRP “Worse Than Expected” outcome status. 12 month period ending six months prior to month of payout Leapfrog website, supplemented by OSHPD data $ .1258 All Commercial and Secure Horizons assigned to PMG PTCA volume threshold (per PHS TAG threshold) 85% of PTCA admissions at hospitals with >200 PTCAs in latest reported year (or per latest OSHPD data available) 12 month period ending slix months prior to month of payout Leapfrog website, supplemented by OSHPD data $ .1258 All Commercial and Secure Horizons assigned to PMG Measure Performance Target Measurement Period Data Source PMPM Component Payment Members Measured Computerized patient entry 85% of elective admissions at hospitals with self-reported compliance on Leapfrog website 12 month period ending six months prior to month of payout Leapfrog website, supplemented by OSHPD data $ .1258 All Commercial and Secure Horizons assigned to PMG Intensive ICU staffing 85% of elective admissions at hospitals with self-reported compliance on Leapfrog website 12 month period ending six months prior to month of payout Leapfrog website, supplemented by OSHPD data $ .1258 All Commercial and Secure Horizons assigned to PMG PEP-C Project Participation 85% of elective admissions at 2002 Survey California Health $ .1258 All Commercial and hospitals participating in PEP-C Project and Foundation Secure Horizons assigned to PMG Breast Cancer screening 70.6% screening performed on members measured 24 month period ending six months prior to payment period PacifiCare Quality Index and Provider Profile $ .2265 Females age 52-69 Cervical Cancer Screening 51.0% screening performed on members measured 36 month period ending six months prior to payment period PacifiCare Quality Index and Provider Profile $ 2265 Females age 21 -64 Childhood Immunizations 45.0% of recommended Immunizations performed on members measured 12 month period ending six months prior to payment peri...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to OIP Table

  • REFERENCE TABLE TIA Section Indenture Section ----------- ----------------- 310(a)(1)..................................................... 6.10 (a)(2)..................................................... 6.10 (a)(3)..................................................... N.A. (a)(4)..................................................... N.A. (a)(5)..................................................... 6.08 (b)........................................................ 6.08; 6.10 (c)........................................................ N.A. 311(a)........................................................ 6.11 (b)........................................................ 6.11 (c)........................................................ N.A. 312(a)........................................................ 2.05 (b)........................................................ 10.03 (c)........................................................ 10.03 313(a)........................................................ 6.06 (b)(1)..................................................... N.A. (b)(2)..................................................... 6.06 (c)........................................................ 6.06; 10.02 (d)........................................................ 6.06 314(a)........................................................ 3.02; 3.03; 10.02 (b)........................................................ N.A. (c)(1)..................................................... 10.04 (c)(2)..................................................... 10.04 (c)(3)..................................................... N.A. (d)........................................................ N.A. (e)........................................................ 10.05 (f)........................................................ N.A. 315(a)........................................................ 6.01(b) (b)........................................................ 6.05; 10.02 (c)........................................................ 6.01(a) (d)........................................................ 6.01(c) (e)........................................................ 5.11 316(a)(last sentence)......................................... 10.06 (a)(1)(A).................................................. 5.05 (a)(1)(B).................................................. 5.02; 5.04; 8.02 (a)(2)..................................................... N.A. (b)........................................................ 5.07 317(a)(1)..................................................... 5.08 (a)(2)..................................................... 5.09 (b)........................................................ 2.04 318(a)........................................................ 10.01 --------------------------

  • CROSS-REFERENCE TABLE Trust Indenture Act Section Indenture Section 310 (a)(1) 7.10 (a)(2) 7.10 (a)(3) N.A.

  • Table 2 (definition of “Casino Gross Revenue”) 15(e) 2 (definition of “Commissioning”) 19 2 (definition of “Committee’s Nominated Representative) 20(1) 6(1)(c) 20(2) 7(8)(a) 21(d) 11(1) 21(e) 11(2) 22(2) 11(3) 23(b) 14(d) 33(2) 15(a)(B) 35(1) 15(b)(i) 35(2) 15(c) 36(b) 15(d) 36(c)

  • Compensation Table Attachment C of each Approved Service Order is a compensation table setting forth the manner in which the City will pay the Maximum Service Order Compensation (“Compensation Table”). Each Compensation Table is subject to the terms and conditions set forth below in Subsections 10.4 through 10.6.

  • Table 4 Ending this Addendum when the Approved Addendum Changes Which Parties may end this Addendum as set out in Section 19: Importer Exporter Ending this Addendum when the Approved Addendum changes Part 2: Mandatory Clauses Entering into this Addendum

  • Table 3 .2: Worked out example of calculating the monitoring quality score of a population for population trend Attribute Country Importance Quality (qij) Weight (wij) wij × qij T MA 2 1 30.0 30.0 T MR 3 2 75.0 150.0 T SN 1 2 2.5 5.0 T GW 1 3 2.5 7.5 T GN 1 3 2.5 7.5 T SL 1 3 2.5 7.5 Sums: 115.0 207.5 Weighted mean rounded to the nearest integer: 2.0

  • Captions; Table of Contents The captions or headings in this Agreement and the Table of Contents are for convenience only and in no way define, limit or describe the scope and intent of any provisions of this Agreement.

  • Table 2 Software Subscription Use Case OpenShift Enterprise OpenShift Enterprise Broker Infrastructure OpenShift Enterprise is intended to be used as a platform as a service and will be supported only when used in that capacity. OpenShift Enterprise is not supported on non-server hardware such as desktops or workstations. OpenShift Enterprise is intended for use on a dedicated Physical Node or Virtual Guest; running other applications and/or programs of any type on the Physical Node or Virtual Guest can have a negative impact on the function and/or performance. Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform for OpenShift and/or Red Hat JBoss EAP for xPaaS will be supported in accordance with the terms of Exhibit 1.B.

  • Headings and Table of Contents The inclusion of headings and a table of contents in this Agreement are for convenience of reference only and will not affect the construction or interpretation hereof.

  • Headings; Table of Contents The headings of the sections of this Agreement and the table of contents have been inserted for convenience of reference only and shall not be deemed a part of this Agreement.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.