MINIMUM PERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND QSI THRESHOLD Sample Clauses

MINIMUM PERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND QSI THRESHOLD. Minimum Operated Mileage Standard 98% Route Categorisation High Frequency Route Initial Minimum Performance Standard (3 January 2015 to 18 September 2015) 0.86 minutes Excess Wait Time Minimum Performance Standard 0.90 minutes Excess Wait Time Method of monitoring QSI Performance Full iBus QSI Coverage Locations See attached Locations list of Full iBus QSI QSI Threshold 0.80 minutes Excess Wait Time Extension Assessment Period Quarter 2 Of Financial Year 2017/18 To Quarter 1 Of Financial Year 2018/19 ROUTE: 192 SCHEDULE ID - ATTACHMENT OUT DIRECTION BACK DIRECTION Timing Point Code Stop Name Timing Point Code Stop Name ENTNLP Little Park Gardens TTHLBS Tottenham Xxxx Bus Station CRRDFR Xxxxxxxxxxxx Road NDPKTS Xxxxxx Drive / Tesco BHPKSN Hail & Ride Xxxx Xxxx Park Station MTGRTR Zambezie Drive BRYSGR Bury Street EDMGBSB Edmonton Green Bus Station EDMGBSD Edmonton Green Bus Station BRYSGR Bury Street MTGRTR Hail & Ride Town Road BHPKSN Xxxx Hill Park Station NDPKTS Xxxxxx Drive / Tesco CRRDFR Xxxxxxxxxxxx Road SCHEDULE IIA VEHICLE SPECIFICATION This Schedule comprises the following: Part 1 Vehicle Description Part 2 No longer used SCHEDULE IIA
Sample 1See All (15)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
MINIMUM PERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND QSI THRESHOLD. Minimum Operated Mileage Standard 98% Route Categorisation Low Frequency Route Initial Minimum Performance Standard (13 September 2014 to 26 June 2015) 89.1% “On-Time” Minimum Performance Standard 90.0% “On-Time” Method of monitoring QSI Performance Full iBus QSI Coverage Locations See attached Locations list of Full iBus QSI QSI Threshold 94.0% “On-Time” Extension Assessment Period Quarter 1 Of Financial Year 2017/2018 To Quarter 4 Of Financial Year 2017/2018 24 – Hour Services Will QSI Performance for the day-service only be used for calculating Performance Payments and assessing Contract Extension Criteria. Not Applicable NO: QC0015 NO: QC44703 ROUTE: 375 SCHEDULE ID - ATTACHMENT OUT DIRECTION BACK DIRECTION Timing Point Code Stop Name Timing Point Code Stop Name ROMFSN Romford Station PASSBG Passingford Bridge ROMFSE Romford Market STABRO Royal Oak COLRCL Xxxxxxx Row Roundabout/ COLRCL Xxxxxxx Row Roundabout/ Clockhouse Xxxx Xxx Close STABRO Royal Oak ROMFSE Romford Market SCHEDULE IIA VEHICLE SPECIFICATION This Schedule comprises the following: Part 1 Vehicle Description Part 2 No longer used SCHEDULE IIA
Sample 1
MINIMUM PERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND QSI THRESHOLD. Minimum Operated Mileage Standard 98% Route Categorisation Low Frequency Route Initial Minimum Performance Standard (1 April 2014 to 2 January 2015) 81.8% “On Time” Minimum Performance Standard 82.0% “On Time” Method of monitoring QSI Performance Full iBus QSI Coverage Locations See attached Locations list of Full iBus QSI QSI Threshold 86.0% “On Time” Extension Assessment Period Quarter 3 of Financial Year 2016/2017 to Quarter 2 of Financial Year 2017/2018 24 – Hour Services Will QSI Performance for the day-service only be used for calculating Performance Payments and assessing Contract Extension Criteria. Not Applicable ROUTE: 317 SCHEDULE ID - ATTACHMENT OUT DIRECTION BACK DIRECTION Timing Point Code Stop Name Timing Point Code Stop Name WALXBS Waltham Cross Bus Station ENTNLP Little Park Gardens STIGCL Turkey Street Station GTCMSR Great Cambridge Road ENFDHH Cambridge Gardens ENFDHH Cambridge Gardens GTCMSR Great Cambridge Road STIGCL Turkey Street Station SCHEDULE IIA VEHICLE SPECIFICATION This Schedule comprises the following: Part 1 Vehicle Description Part 2 No longer used SCHEDULE IIA
Sample 1
MINIMUM PERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND QSI THRESHOLD. Minimum Operated Mileage Standard 98% Route Categorisation Low Frequency Route Initial Minimum Performance Standard (1 April 2015 to 8 January 2016) 89.8 % “On-Time” Minimum Performance Standard 90.0 % “On-Time” Method of monitoring QSI Performance Full iBus QSI Coverage Locations See attached Locations list of Full iBus QSI QSI Threshold 94.0% “On-Time” Extension Assessment Period Quarter 3 Of Financial Year 2017/18 To Quarter 2 Of Financial Year 2018/19 SCHEDULE ID - ATTACHMENT OUT DIRECTION BACK DIRECTION Timing Point Code Stop Name Timing Point Code Stop Name CANNBS Canning Town Bus Station MNSNGR Mile End Station / Bow Road CODRBC South Crescent Business Centre DEVRSN Devons Road Station DEVRSN Devons Road Station CODRBC North Crescent Business Centre SCHEDULE IIA VEHICLE SPECIFICATION This Schedule comprises the following: Part 1 Vehicle Description Part 2 No longer used SCHEDULE IIA
Sample 1
MINIMUM PERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND QSI THRESHOLD. Minimum Operated Mileage Standard 98% Route Categorisation Low Frequency Route Initial Minimum Performance Standard (13 September 2008 to 26 June 2009) 81.2 % “On-Time” Minimum Performance Standard 82.0 % “On-Time” Method of monitoring QSI Performance Manual QSI Surveys QSI Coverage Locations $ Observed simultaneously in both directions. Counted as two surveys. Towards Whyteleafe South Coulsdon Red Lion $ Purley $ Towards Coulsden, Ridgemont Avenue Purley $ Coulsdon Red Lion $ Number of Manual QSI Surveys scheduled per Quarter: 60 QSI Threshold 86.0 % “On-Time” Extension Assessment Period Quarter 1 Of Financial Year 2011/2012 To Quarter 4 Of Financial Year 2011/2012 24 – Hour Services Will QSI Performance for the day- service only be used for calculating Performance Payments and assessing Contract Extension Criteria. N/A
Sample 1

Related to MINIMUM PERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND QSI THRESHOLD

  • Ongoing Performance Measures The Department intends to use performance-reporting tools in order to measure the performance of Contractor(s). These tools will include the Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit H), to be completed by Customers on a quarterly basis. Such measures will allow the Department to better track Vendor performance through the term of the Contract(s) and ensure that Contractor(s) consistently provide quality services to the State and its Customers. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MFMP or on the Department's website).

  • Performance Standard Contractor shall perform all work hereunder in a manner consistent with the level of competency and standard of care normally observed by a person practicing in Contractor's profession. County has relied upon the professional ability and training of Contractor as a material inducement to enter into this Agreement. Contractor hereby agrees to provide all services under this Agreement in accordance with generally accepted professional practices and standards of care, as well as the requirements of applicable federal, state and local laws, it being understood that acceptance of Contractor’s work by County shall not operate as a waiver or release. If County determines that any of Contractor's work is not in accordance with such level of competency and standard of care, County, in its sole discretion, shall have the right to do any or all of the following: (a) require Contractor to meet with County to review the quality of the work and resolve matters of concern; (b) require Contractor to repeat the work at no additional charge until it is satisfactory; (c) terminate this Agreement pursuant to the provisions of Article 4; or (d) pursue any and all other remedies at law or in equity.

  • Performance Levels (a) The Performance Levels which apply to the performance by the respective Parties of their obligations under this Agreement are set out in Part 1 of Schedule 5. A failure by either Party to achieve the relevant Performance Level will not constitute a breach of this Agreement and the only consequences of such failure as between the Parties shall be the consequences set out in this Clause 5.6.

  • Performance Standards The Contractor agrees to perform all tasks and provide deliverables as set forth in the Contract. The Department and the Customer will be entitled at all times, upon request, to be advised as to the status of work being done by the Contractor and of the details thereof.

  • Quarterly Contractor Performance Reporting Customers shall complete a Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit I) for each Contractor on a Quarterly basis. Customers will electronically submit the completed Contractor Performance Survey(s) to the Department Contract Manager no later than the due date indicated in Contract Exhibit D, Section 17, Additional Special Contract Conditions. The completed Contractor Performance Survey(s) will be used by the Department as a performance-reporting tool to measure the performance of Contractors. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MyFloridaMarketPlace or on the Department's website).

  • Registry Performance Specifications Registry Performance Specifications for operation of the TLD will be as set forth in Specification 10 attached hereto (“Specification 10”). Registry Operator shall comply with such Performance Specifications and, for a period of at least one (1) year, shall keep technical and operational records sufficient to evidence compliance with such specifications for each calendar year during the Term.

  • Performance Requirements 1. Neither Party may impose or enforce any of the following requirements, or enforce any commitment or undertaking, in connection with the establishment, acquisition, expansion, management, conduct or operation of an investment of an investor of a Party or of a non-Party in its territory:

  • Performance Measurement Satisfactory performance of this Contract will be measured by:

  • Performance Targets Threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance measure of the performance period are contained in Appendix B.

  • Performance Measures and Metrics This section outlines the performance measures and metrics upon which service under this SLA will be assessed. Shared Service Centers and Customers will negotiate the performance metric, frequency, customer and provider service responsibilities associated with each performance measure. Measurements of the Port of Seattle activities are critical to improving services and are the basis for cost recovery for services provided. The Port of Seattle and The Northwest Seaport Alliance have identified activities critical to meeting The NWSA’s business requirements and have agreed upon how these activities will be assessed.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.