Faculty Representation at Administrative Meetings Sample Clauses

Faculty Representation at Administrative Meetings. Where practicable and desirable, the College should invite Faculty members to attend special purpose or ad hoc Administration meetings at College level. As in the case of the President's Ad Hoc Budget Staff Meetings in 1994/95, this may be on a regular basis and should include Faculty from each main campus. The roles of such Faculty at these meetings shall normally be limited to observing, clarifying, advising, and providing a Faculty perspective. The Faculty roles after the meeting shall include communicating accurate information and responsible impressions to the Faculty at large and relaying Faculty responses back to the respective Administrative group.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Faculty Representation at Administrative Meetings. The UFF-BC President and the Faculty Senate President or their designees shall be notified and permitted to attend special purpose or ad hoc Administration meetings at College level. The roles of Faculty at these meetings shall normally be limited to observing, clarifying, advising, and providing a Faculty perspective. The Faculty roles after the meeting shall include communicating accurate information and responsible impressions to the Faculty at large and relaying Faculty responses back to the respective Administrative group.
Sample 1Sample 2

Related to Faculty Representation at Administrative Meetings

  • Health and Safety Representative Meetings 13.1 A health and safety representative will be allowed reasonable paid time during working hours to attend occupational health and safety matters, including meetings affecting employees they represent, providing that the Representative informs their manager.

  • CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION & NOTICES Except for legal notices, the parties hereby designate the following contract administrators as the respective single points of contact for purposes of this Master Contract. Enterprise Services’ contract administrator shall provide Master Contract oversight. Contractor’s contract administrator shall be Contractor’s principal contact for business activities under this Master Contract. The parties may change contractor administrators by written notice as set forth below. Any notices required or desired shall be in writing and sent by U.S. mail, postage prepaid, or sent via email, and shall be sent to the respective addressee at the respective address or email address set forth below or to such other address or email address as the parties may specify in writing: Enterprise Services Contractor

  • Required Confidentiality Claim Form This is a requirement of the TIPS Contract and is non-negotiable. TIPS provides the required TIPS Confidentiality Claim Form in the "Attachments" section of this solicitation. Vendor must execute this form by either signing and waiving any confidentiality claim, or designating portions of Vendor's proposal confidential. If Vendor considers any portion of Vendor's proposal to be confidential and not subject to public disclosure pursuant to Chapter 552 Texas Gov’t Code or other law(s) and orders, Vendor must have identified the claimed confidential materials through proper execution of the Confidentiality Claim Form. If TIPS receives a public information act or similar request, any responsive documentation not deemed confidential by you in this manner will be automatically released. For Vendor documents deemed confidential by you in this manner, TIPS will follow procedures of controlling statute(s) regarding any claim of confidentiality and shall not be liable for any release of information required by law, including Attorney General determination and opinion. Notwithstanding any other Vendor designation of Vendor's proposal as confidential or proprietary, Vendor’s submission of this proposal constitutes Vendor’s agreement that proper execution of the required TIPS Confidentiality Claim Form is the only way to assert any portion of Vendor's proposal as confidential.

  • Reasonable Suspicion Testing The Employer may, but does not have a legal duty to, request or require an employee to undergo drug and alcohol testing if the Employer or any supervisor of the employee has a reasonable suspicion (a belief based on specific facts and rational inferences drawn from those facts) related to the performance of the job that the employee:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.