Evidentiary Preclusion. The Parties agree that, to the fullest extent permitted by law, neither this Agreement nor the Settlement, nor any act performed or document executed pursuant to or in furtherance of this Agreement or the Settlement: (a) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission of, or evidence of, the validity of any claim or of any wrongdoing or liability of the Released Persons; or (b) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission of, or evidence of, any fault or omission of any Released Party or the appropriateness of class certification in any civil, criminal, or administrative proceeding in any court, administrative agency, or other tribunal. In addition, any failure of the Court to approve the Settlement and/or any objections or interventions may not be used as evidence in the Litigation or any other proceeding for any purpose whatsoever. However, the Released Persons may file this Agreement and/or the Final Approval Order and Judgment in any action or proceeding that may be brought against them in order to support a defense or counterclaim based on principles of res judicata, collateral estoppel, release, good faith settlement, judgment bar or reduction or any other theory of claim preclusion or issue preclusion, or similar defense or counterclaim.
Evidentiary Preclusion. The Parties agree that, to the fullest extent permitted by law, neither this Agreement nor the Settlement, nor any act performed or document executed pursuant to or in furtherance of this Agreement or the Settlement: (a) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission of, or evidence of, the validity of any claim or of any wrongdoing or liability of the Released Parties; or
Evidentiary Preclusion. In order to support a defense or counterclaim based on principles of res judicata, collateral estoppel, release, good faith settlement, judgment bar or reduction or any other theory of claim preclusion or issue preclusion or similar defense or counterclaim, the Released Parties may file the Agreement and/or the judgment in any action or proceeding that may be brought against them.
Evidentiary Preclusion. Neither the Settlement, the Memorandum of Understanding nor any act performed or document executed pursuant to or in furtherance of the Settlement: (i) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission of, or evidence of, the validity of any released claim, or of any wrongdoing or liability of the Released Parties; (ii) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission of, or evidence of, any fault or omission of the Released Parties in any civil, criminal or administrative proceeding in any court, administrative agency or other tribunal; or (iii) is or may be deemed to be a waiver of Synchrony’s rights to seek to enforce any arbitration provision in other cases or against persons in the Settlement Class who opt out of the Settlement. In addition, neither the fact of, nor any documents relating to, Synchrony’s withdrawal from the Settlement, any failure of the Court to approve the Settlement and/or any objections or interventions may be used as evidence for any purpose whatsoever. The Released Parties may file the Settlement Agreement and/or the judgment in any action or proceeding that may be brought against them in order to support a defense or counterclaim based on principles of res judicata, collateral estoppel, release, good faith settlement, judgment bar or reduction or any other theory of claim preclusion or issue preclusion or any other defense or counterclaim.
Evidentiary Preclusion. Neither this Settlement Agreement, nor any act performed or document executed pursuant to or in furtherance of the settlement: (a) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission of, or evidence of, the validity of any Released Claim, or of any wrongdoing or liability of the Released Parties; (b) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission of, or evidence of, any fault or omission of the Released Parties in any civil, criminal, or administrative proceeding in any court, administrative agency, or other forum; (c) is, may be deemed, or shall be construed against Plaintiff and the Settlement Class, or each or any of them, or against the Released Parties, or each or any of them, as an admission, concession, or evidence that the consideration to be given hereunder represents an amount equal to, less than, or greater than that amount that could have or would have been recovered after trial; and (d) is, may be deemed, or shall be construed against Plaintiff and the Settlement Class, or each or any of them, or against the Released Parties, or each or any of them, as an admission, concession, or evidence that any of Plaintiff’s or the Settlement Class’ claims are with or without merit or that damages recoverable in the Action would have exceeded or would have been less than any particular amount. In addition, neither the fact of, nor any documents relating to, Xxxxxx’x withdrawal from the settlement, any failure of the Court to approve the settlement, and/or any objections or interventions may be used as evidence for any purpose whatsoever. The Released Parties may file this Settlement Agreement and/or the judgment in any action or proceeding that may be brought against them in order to support a defense or counterclaim based on principles of res judicata, collateral estoppel, release, good faith settlement, judgment bar, reduction, or any other theory of claim preclusion or issue preclusion or similar defense or counterclaim.
Evidentiary Preclusion. The Parties agree that, to the fullest extent permitted by law, neither this Agreement nor the Settlement, nor any act performed or document executed pursuant to or in furtherance of this Agreement or the Settlement: (i) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission of, or evidence of, the validity of any claim or of any wrongdoing or liability of the Released Parties; or (ii) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission of, or evidence of, any fault or omission of any Released Party or the appropriateness of class certification in any civil, criminal or administrative proceeding in any court, administrative agency or other tribunal. In addition, neither the fact of, nor any documents relating to, the GEICO COMPANIES’ withdrawal from the Settlement, any failure of the Court to approve the Settlement and/or any objections or interventions may be used as evidence in the Action or any other proceeding for any purpose whatsoever. However, the Released Parties may file the Settlement Agreement and/or the Final Approval Order in any action or proceeding that may be brought against them in order to support a defense or counterclaim based on principles of res judicata, collateral estoppel, release, good faith settlement, judgment bar or reduction or any other theory of claim preclusion or issue preclusion or similar defense or counterclaim.
Evidentiary Preclusion. The Parties agree that, to the fullest extent permitted by law, neither this Agreement nor the Settlement, nor any act performed or document executed pursuant to or in furtherance of this Agreement or the Settlement: (a) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission of, or evidence of, the validity of any claim or of any wrongdoing or liability of the Released Parties; or (b) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission of, or evidence of, any fault or omission of any Released Party or the appropriateness of class certification in any civil, criminal or administrative proceeding in any court, administrative agency or other tribunal. In addition, any failure of the Court to approve the Settlement and/or any objections or interventions may not be used as evidence in the Action or any other proceeding for any purpose whatsoever. However, the Released Parties may file the Agreement and/or the Final Approval Order in any action or proceeding that may be brought against them in order to support a defense or counterclaim based on principles of res judicata, collateral estoppel, release, good faith settlement, judgment bar or reduction or any other theory of claim preclusion or issue preclusion or similar defense or counterclaim. Electronically Filed - Xxxxxx - June 15, 2018 - 02:02 PM
Evidentiary Preclusion. In the event that the Settlement is not approved as presented, or Defendants terminate the Settlement as permitted herein, the parties agree that neither the terms of this Agreement nor any publicly disseminated information regarding the Settlement, including, without limitation, the Original Class Notice, the New Class Notice, court filings, orders or public statements, may be used as evidence for any purpose whatsoever. In addition, neither the fact of, nor any documents relating to, Defendants’ termination of the Settlement, any failure of the Court to approve the Settlement or any objections or interventions may be used as evidence for any purpose whatsoever.
Evidentiary Preclusion. In the event that the Settlement is not approved as presented, or the Quicktrim Parties terminate the Settlement as permitted herein, the Settling Parties agree that neither the terms of this Agreement, the Settling Parties' settlement negotiations, nor any publicly disseminated information regarding the Settlement, including, without limitation, the Publication Notice, or Internet Notice, court filings, orders, or public statements, may be used as evidence for any purpose whatsoever. In addition, neither the fact of, nor any documents relating to, the Quicktrim Parties' termination of the Settlement, any failure of the Court to approve the Settlement, or any objections or interventions may be used as evidence for any purpose whatsoever.
Evidentiary Preclusion. The Parties agree that, to the fullest extent permitted by law, neither this Agreement nor the Settlement, nor any act performed or document executed pursuant to or in furtherance of this Agreement or the Settlement: (a) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission of, or evidence of, the validity of any claim or of any wrongdoing or liability of the Released Persons; or (b) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission of, or evidence of, any fault or omission of any Released Person or the appropriateness of class certification in any proceeding in any court, administrative agency, or other tribunal. In addition, any failure of the Court to approve the Settlement and any objections or interventions may not be used as evidence in the Action or any other proceeding for any other purpose whatsoever. However, the Released Persons may file the Agreement and the Final Approval Order in any action or proceeding that may be brought against them in order to support a defense or counterclaim including based on principles of res judicata, collateral estoppel, release, accord and satisfaction, judgment bar or reduction, or any other theory of claim preclusion or issue preclusion or similar defense or counterclaim.
