Evaluation of Award Sample Clauses

Evaluation of Award. Insights Training group, LLC anticipates the award of a single contract as a result of this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose proposal is responsive to the solicitations and is determined to be the best value. Selection of the best value is determined through the process of evaluating strengths and weaknesses of each Offeror’s proposal in accordance with the evaluation criteria stated herein. In determining the best value, credentials are more important than past performance and credentials and past performance combined are more important that cost. Insights Training Group, LLC is more concerned with obtaining a proposal demonstrating superior credentialing and past performance than making an award at the lowest evaluated cost. Thus, the closer or more similar in merit that the Offeror’s credentials and past performance are evaluated to be the more likely the evaluated cost may be the determining factor in selection for award. However, Insights Training Group, LLC will not make an award at the premium in cost that it considers disproportionate to the benefits associated with the evaluated superiority of the Offeror’s credentials and past performance. Attachment 1
Sample 1See All (8)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation of Award. 7.1 The Fundholder shall provide to the Research Foundation such information relating to the Award as the Research Foundation may reasonably request for the purpose of auditing and evaluating the Award.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
Evaluation of Award. ITG anticipates the award of a single contract as a result of this solicitation to the responsible Offeror whose proposal is responsive to the solicitation and is determined to be the best value. Selection of the best value is determined through the process of evaluating strengths and weaknesses of each Offeror’s proposal in accordance with the evaluation criteria stated herein. In determining the best value, credentials are more important than past performance. And, credentials and past performance combined are more important than cost. ITG is more concerned with obtaining a proposal demonstrating superior credentialing and past performance than making an award at the lowest evaluated cost. Thus, the closer or more similar in merit that the Offeror’s credentials and past performance are evaluated to be; the more likely the evaluated cost may be the determining factor in selection for award. However, ITG will not make an award at a premium in cost that it considers disproportionate to the benefits associated with the evaluated superiority of the offeror’s credentials and past performance. Attachment 1 TEAP Scope of Work The general emphasis of TEAP must be on prevention, education, identification of substance problems, relapse prevention, and helping students overcome barriers to employability.
Sample 1
Evaluation of Award. Insights Training Group, LLC anticipates the award of a single contract (but will also consider part time offers) as a result of this solicitation to the responsible Offeror whose proposal is responsive to the solicitation and is determined to be the best value. Selection of the best value is determined through the process of evaluating strengths and weaknesses of each Offeror’s proposal in accordance with the evaluation criteria stated herein. In determining the best value, credentials are more important than past performance and credentials and past performance combined are more important than cost. Insights Training Group, LLC is more concerned with obtaining a proposal demonstrating superior credentialing and past performance than making an award at the lowest evaluated cost. Thus, the closer or more similar in merit that the Offeror’s credentials and past performance are evaluated to be the more likely the evaluated cost may be the determining factor in selection for award. However, Insights Training Group, LLC will not make an award at a premium in cost that it considers disproportionate to the benefits associated with the evaluated superiority of the offeror’s credentials and past performance. Attachment 1
Sample 1
Evaluation of Award. Exceed Corporation anticipates the award of a single contract as a result of this solicitation to the responsible Offeror whose proposal is responsive to the solicitation and is determined to be the best value. Selection of the best value is determined through the process of evaluating strengths and weaknesses of each Offeror’s proposal in accordance with the evaluation criteria stated herein. In determining the best value, credentials are more important than past performance. And, credentials and past performance combined are more important than cost. Exceed Corporation is more concerned with obtaining a proposal demonstrating superior credentialing and past performance than making an award at the lowest evaluated cost. Thus, the closer or more similar in merit that the Offeror’s credentials and past performance are evaluated to be; the more likely the evaluated cost may be the determining factor in selection for award. However, Exceed Corporation will not make an award at a premium in cost that it considers disproportionate to the benefits associated with the evaluated superiority of the offeror’s credentials and past performance. Attachment 1 DENTIST
Sample 1

Related to Evaluation of Award

  • Notification of Award 2.28.1 Prior to the expiration of the period of tender validity, the Procuring entity will notify the successful tenderer in writing that its tender has been accepted.

  • METHOD OF AWARD AND PROCEDURE FOR AWARDING A SOW AGREEMENT 5.1. Contractor selection, or the determination to terminate the SOW-RFP without award, shall be done in the best interest of the State.

  • EVALUATION OF OPTIONS The County shall evaluate bids for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price of the basic period. However, the evaluation of options shall not obligate the County to exercise the option(s).

  • Appeal of Award Within thirty (30) days of a final award by the single arbitrator, you or we may appeal the award for reconsideration by a three-arbitrator panel. If you or we appeal, the other party may cross- appeal within thirty (30) days afler notice of the appeal. The panel will reconsider all aspects of the initial award that are appealed, including related findings of fact.

  • METHOD OF AWARD Select a method of award below for vehicles built to specifications at the OEM factory, and/or pre-existing inventory, as applicable. Method of Award for Vehicles Built to Specifications at the OEM Factory: Lowest price to a single contractor that can meet the specified delivery date, and supply the total number of vehicles requested. Method of Award for Pre-Existing Inventory Vehicles: Lowest price to a single contractor that can meet the specified delivery date, and provide the total number of vehicles requested. Lowest price for each contractor responding to the mini-bid will be determined by calculating the sum of the Total NYS Contract Price for Mini-Bid for all vehicles bid (i.e., the Grand Total NYS Contract Price of Vehicles Bid). Lowest price, per vehicle (i.e., the Total NYS Contract Price for Mini-Bid), to multiple Contractors that can meet the specified delivery date.

  • Award Criteria 40.1 The Procuring Entity shall award the Contract to the successful tenderer whose tender has been determined to be the Lowest Evaluated Tender in accordance with procedures in Section 3: Evaluation and Qualification Criteria.

  • Yes - No If awarded on Part 1 of the TIPS Contract, for the duration of the Contract, Vendor agrees to provide catalog pricing, as defined in the solicitation and below, to TIPS upon request for any goods and services offered on PART 1 of the Vendor's TIPS Contract, if any. "Catalog" means the available list of tangible personal property or services, in the most current listing, regardless of date, during the life of the contract, that takes the form of a catalog, price list, schedule, shelf price or other form that: A. is regularly maintained by the manufacturer or Vendor of an item; and B. is either published or otherwise available for inspection by a customer during the purchase process; C. to which the minimum discount proposed by the proposing Vendor may be applied. YES TIPS administration fee By submitting a proposal, I agree that all pricing submitted to TIPS shall include the participation fee, as designated in the solicitation or as otherwise agreed in writing and shall be remitted to TIPS by the Vendor or the vendor's named resellers and as agreed in the Vendor agreement. I agree that the fee shall not and will not be added by the vendor as a separate line item on a TIPS member invoice, quote, proposal or any other written communications with the TIPS member.

  • Basis of Award No additional documents submitted by a Bidder should be incorporated in the contract unless it is specifically identified and incorporated by reference in the attached contract document. Balance of page intentionally left blank

  • Evaluation of Students Acknowledging the District’s adopted grading system, the teacher shall maintain the right and responsibility to determine grades and other evaluation of a student. No grade or evaluation shall be changed except by the teacher with the approval of the building administrator.

  • Performance of Service 2.1 Appendix A (General Provisions), Articles 1 through 16, governs the performance of services under this contract. 2.2 Appendix B sets forth the liability and insurance provisions of this contract. 2.3 Appendix C sets forth the services to be performed by the contractor. ARTICLE 3.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.