Selection for Award Clause Samples
The 'Selection for Award' clause defines the criteria and process by which a contract or agreement will be awarded to a bidder or participant. Typically, this clause outlines the evaluation methods, such as technical merit, price, or past performance, and may specify whether the lowest bid or the most advantageous offer will be chosen. Its core practical function is to ensure transparency and fairness in the selection process, providing clear guidelines for both the awarding party and potential candidates, and reducing disputes over how the final decision is made.
Selection for Award. Award selection will be based on the best approach, taking into consideration the desire for quality service at reasonable menu prices, in combination with past service quality and experience. The Embassy may award this Agreement solely on the basis of the evaluation of the initial offers, without any negotiations, request for samples, or oral presentations. Therefore, tenders should be submitted on the most favorable terms possible.
Selection for Award. 1. The Government will select one person/organization for award.
2. Those tenders that receive a technically acceptable rating from the review described above will be eligible for further consideration.
3. The technically acceptable person/organization that proposes the best combination of price, service, reliability, past performance, financial capability, and established country and international presence will receive the award.
Selection for Award. Award selection will be based on the best approach, taking into consideration the desire for quality service at reasonable menu prices, in combination with past service quality and experience. The Licensor (the EASE Board) may award this Agreement solely on the basis of the evaluation of the initial offers, without any negotiations, request for samples, or oral presentations. Therefore, tenders should be submitted on the most favorable terms possible.
Selection for Award. Award selection will be based on the best approach, taking into consideration the desire for quality service at reasonable menu prices, in combination with past service quality and experience. The U.S. Consulate General Johannesburg may award this Agreement solely on the basis of the evaluation of the initial offers, without any negotiations, request for samples, or oral presentations. Therefore, tenders should be submitted on the most favorable terms possible.
Selection for Award. Award selection will be based on the best approach, taking into consideration the desire for quality service at reasonable menu prices, in combination with past service quality and experience. The Embassy may award this Agreement solely on the basis of the evaluation of the initial offers, without any negotiations, request for samples, or oral presentations. Therefore, tenders should be submitted on the most favorable terms possible. EXHIBIT A: Performance Required under the Licensing Agreement EXHIBIT B: Licensor-Furnished Property EXHIBIT C: Holiday Schedule EXHIBIT D: Approved Cleaning Materials EXHIBIT E: Cafeteria Plan EXHIBIT F: Kitchen Plan
Selection for Award. Award selection will be based on the best approach, taking into consideration the desire for quality service at reasonable menu prices, in combination with past service quality and experience. ACE may award this Agreement solely on the basis of the evaluation of the initial offers, without any negotiations, request for samples, or oral presentations. Therefore, tenders should be submitted on the most favorable terms possible.
Selection for Award. The Government intends to award up to three BPAs resulting from this solicitation to responsible Quoters. Award shall be made to the Quoters whose quotation is determined to be the best value to the Government based on a tradeoff among the non-price and price factors. The Government intends to issue awards without communication with Quoters. Consequently, Quoters are highly encouraged to provide their best quote with initial submissions. However, the Government reserves the right to review quotes with any or all Quoters submitting a quote, if it is determined advantageous to the Government to do so. This statement is not to be construed to mean that the Government is obligated to conduct such a conversation with any Quoter. A Quoter may be eliminated from consideration for award without further dialogue or explanation prior to award if its quote is not found to be among those Quoters considered most advantageous to the Government based on a best value determination.