Evaluation Criterion and Categories for Counseling Faculty Sample Clauses

Evaluation Criterion and Categories for Counseling Faculty. The criterion for evaluating and recommending full-time counseling faculty shall be the quality of activity, including keeping current in one’s field, within each of the categories listed below (Articles 7.3.1.1 – 7.3.1.6). All individuals and bodies evaluating counseling faculty shall weight these categories in the order listed. Any special conditions in the member’s letter of appointment or subsequent extensions or modification of such appointment as provided in Article 4.7 shall be considered in the evaluation process for renewal, promotion or tenure.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation Criterion and Categories for Counseling Faculty. [On Tenure Track Appointments]
Evaluation Criterion and Categories for Counseling Faculty. The criterion for evaluating and recommending full -time Counseling Faculty shall be the

Related to Evaluation Criterion and Categories for Counseling Faculty

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Evaluation, Testing, and Monitoring 1. The System Agency may review, test, evaluate and monitor Grantee’s Products and services, as well as associated documentation and technical support for compliance with the Accessibility Standards. Review, testing, evaluation and monitoring may be conducted before and after the award of a contract. Testing and monitoring may include user acceptance testing. Neither the review, testing (including acceptance testing), evaluation or monitoring of any Product or service, nor the absence of review, testing, evaluation or monitoring, will result in a waiver of the State’s right to contest the Grantee’s assertion of compliance with the Accessibility Standards.

  • Additional RO Review Criteria (1) In addition to the requirements in Subparagraph 34A, the RO must:

  • Program Monitoring and Evaluation (c) The Recipient shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and furnish to the Association not later than six months after the Closing Date, a report of such scope and in such detail as the Association shall reasonably request, on the execution of the Program, the performance by the Recipient and the Association of their respective obligations under the Legal Agreements and the accomplishment of the purposes of the Financing.”

  • TESTING AND COMMISSIONING 24 Allow for a Lump Sum for testing and commissioning of the entire electrical installation, including the provision of Compliance Certificate. Item Carried to Collection R Section No. 4 Electrical Installation (Provisional) Bill No. 1 Electrical Installation COLLECTION Total Brought Forward from Page No. Carried to Final Summary 76 77 R Amount FINAL SUMMARY Section No Page No 1 Preliminaries 26 2 Alterations (Provisional) 30 3 External Works (Provisional) 73

  • Training and Orientation (a) No employee shall be required to work on any job or operate any piece of equipment until he/she has received proper training and instruction.

  • Responsibility for Evaluation Within each school the Principal will be responsible for the evaluation of employees assigned to that school. Evaluation will be made by the Principal or a qualified administrator. An employee assigned to more than one school will be evaluated by the Principal of the school in which the employee is assigned for the greater amount of time, with input provided by the Principal of the other school. Any Principal or person charged with the responsibility of evaluation of employees may involve other staff and students in the process if acceptable to the certificated teacher being evaluated.

  • STATEWIDE ACHIEVEMENT TESTING When CONTRACTOR is an NPS, per implementation of Senate Bill 484, CONTRACTOR shall administer all Statewide assessments within the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (“CAASP”), Desired Results Developmental Profile (“DRDP”), California Alternative Assessment (“CAA”), achievement and abilities tests (using LEA-authorized assessment instruments), the Fitness Gram with the exception of the English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (“ELPAC”) to be completed by the LEA, and as appropriate to the student, and mandated by XXX xxxxxxxx to LEA and state and federal guidelines. CONTRACTOR is subject to the alternative accountability system developed pursuant to Education Code section 52052, in the same manner as public schools. Each LEA student placed with CONTRACTOR by the LEA shall be tested by qualified staff of CONTRACTOR in accordance with that accountability program. XXX shall provide test administration training to CONTRACTOR’S qualified staff. CONTRACTOR shall attend LEA test training and comply with completion of all coding requirements as required by XXX.

  • Evaluation Cycle: Annual Orientation A) At the start of each school year, the superintendent, principal or designee shall conduct a meeting for Educators and Evaluators focused substantially on educator evaluation. The superintendent, principal or designee shall:

  • PROCEDURES AND/OR CRITERIA FOR COURSE ARTICULATION a. Complete the ROP Careers with Children course at Freedom High School with a grade of “B” or better.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.