Determination of Program Technology Ownership Sample Clauses

Determination of Program Technology Ownership. Either Party (the “Notifying Party”) may give notice (the “Prosecution Notice”) to the other Party that it believes Patent Prosecution should be sought for any Program Technology at any time during the Term, which in any event will be prior to either Party filing a patent application claiming such Program Technology. The Prosecution Notice will state the opinion of the Notifying Party as to whether the Program Technology belongs in the ARCHEMIX Program Technology, EYETECH Program Technology or Joint Program Technology category of ownership and will provide all relevant information reasonably available to the Notifying Party with regard to such opinion. The Notifying Party will also provide all additional information, available to such Portions of this Exhibit were omitted and have been filed separately with the Secretary of the Commission pursuant to the Company’s application requesting confidential treatment under Rule 406 of the Securities Act. Notifying Party, with respect thereto that is reasonably requested by the other Party. Within [***] days of receipt of the Prosecution Notice, the other Party shall provide a written response (the “Response”) stating its ownership category opinion to the Notifying Party.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Determination of Program Technology Ownership

  • Conduct of Research Program Each Party:

  • Background Technology List here prior contracts to assign Inventions that are now in existence between any other person or entity and you. [ ] List here previous Inventions which you desire to have specifically excluded from the operation of this Agreement. Continue on reverse side if necessary.

  • Collaboration Each Party shall provide to the enforcing Party reasonable assistance in such enforcement, at such enforcing Party’s request and expense, including to be named in such action if required by Applicable Laws to pursue such action. The enforcing Party shall keep the other Party regularly informed of the status and progress of such enforcement efforts, shall reasonably consider the other Party’s comments on any such efforts, including determination of litigation strategy and filing of material papers to the competent court. The non-enforcing Party shall be entitled to separate representation in such matter by counsel of its own choice and at its own expense, but such Party shall at all times cooperate fully with the enforcing Party.

  • Development of Products (a) During the term of this Agreement, ViewRay may from time to time seek services from PEKO with respect to the development of certain Products that can be incorporated into the ViewRay Renaissance™ MRI-guided radiation therapy system. For each Program to be undertaken by PEKO pursuant to this Agreement, the parties will prepare a “Work Statement” and agree to said “Work Statement” in substantially the form attached as Attachment 1. Each Work Statement will describe: (i) the (i) services that PEKO will be responsible for providing to ViewRay and the deliverables that PEKO will be responsible for delivering to ViewRay (“Deliverable(s)”), (ii) delivery schedule for the Deliverables, (iii) pricing terms, (iv) work plan for the Program, and (v) ViewRay’s responsibilities in connection with the Program. Each Work Statement will be prepared based upon the requirements and information provided to PEKO by ViewRay. A separate Work Statement will be required for each Program; and each Work Statement will become subject to this Agreement only when mutually agreed and signed by ViewRay and PEKO.

  • Research Collaboration (a) GSK hereby grants to Anacor a non-exclusive, non-royalty bearing license under the GSK IP, solely as and to the extent necessary or important to conduct activities for which Anacor is responsible under the Research Plans during the Research Collaboration Term.

  • Development and Commercialization Subject to Sections 4.6 and 4.7, Fibrocell shall be solely responsible for the development and Commercialization of Fibrocell Products and Improved Products. Fibrocell shall be responsible for all costs incurred in connection with the Fibroblast Program except that Intrexon shall be responsible for the following: (a) costs of establishing manufacturing capabilities and facilities in connection with Intrexon’s manufacturing obligation under Section 4.6 (provided, however, that Intrexon may include an allocable portion of such costs, through depreciation and amortization, when calculating the Fully Loaded Cost of manufacturing a Fibrocell Product, to the extent such allocation, depreciation, and amortization is permitted by US GAAP, it being recognized that the majority of non-facilities scale-up costs cannot be capitalized and amortized under US GAAP); (b) costs of basic research with respect to the Intrexon Channel Technology and Intrexon Materials (i.e., platform improvements) but, for clarity, excluding research described in Section 4.7 or research requested by the JSC for the development of a Fibrocell Product or an Improved Product (which research costs shall be reimbursed by Fibrocell); (c) [*****]; and (d) costs of filing, prosecution and maintenance of Intrexon Patents. The costs encompassed within subsection (a) above shall include the scale-up of Intrexon Materials and related active pharmaceutical ingredients for clinical trials and Commercialization of Fibrocell Products undertaken pursuant to Section 4.6, which shall be at Intrexon’s cost whether it elects to conduct such efforts internally or through Third Party contractors retained by either Intrexon or Fibrocell (with Intrexon’s consent).

  • Research Program The term “Research Program” shall mean the research program to be undertaken by TSRI under the direction and control of the Principal Investigator as expressly set forth on Exhibit A hereto.

  • Development Program A. Development Activities to be Undertaken (Please break activities into subunits with the date of completion of major milestones)

  • Tests and Preclinical and Clinical Trials The preclinical studies and clinical trials conducted by or, to the Company’s knowledge, on behalf of the Company, that are described in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Prospectus, as applicable, and are intended to be submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) or other comparable government entities, were and, if still ongoing, are being conducted in all material respects in accordance with experimental protocols, procedures and controls pursuant to accepted professional scientific standards and all Authorizations and Applicable Laws, including, without limitation, current Good Clinical Practices and Good Laboratory Practices and any applicable rules and regulations of the jurisdiction in which such trials and studies are being conducted; the descriptions of the results of such studies and trials contained in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Prospectus are, to the Company’s knowledge, accurate and complete in all material respects and fairly present the data derived from such studies and trials; except to the extent disclosed in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Prospectus, the Company is not aware of any studies or trials, the results of which the Company believes reasonably call into question the study or trial results described or referred to in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Prospectus when viewed in the context in which such results are described and the clinical stage of development; and, except to the extent disclosed in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package or the Prospectus, the Company has not received any written notices or written correspondence from the FDA or any governmental entity requiring the termination or suspension of any preclinical studies or clinical trials conducted by or on behalf of the Company, other than ordinary course communications with respect to modifications in connection with the design and implementation of such trials, copies of which communications have been made available to you.

  • Joint Inventions (a) There are countries (not including the United States) which require the express consent of all inventors or their assignees to the grant of licenses or rights under patents issued in such countries for joint inventions.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.