CO-CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES EVALUATION Sample Clauses

CO-CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES EVALUATION. All coaches and club advisors shall be evaluated in writing annually using the evaluation forms attached as Appendix E. Head coaches and club advisors shall be evaluated by the Activities Director within 45 days of the completion of the activity. All assistant and feeder program coaches will be evaluated by the program’s head coach within 30 days of the completion of the activity, with input from the Activities Director and building principals. Club advisors will be evaluated by the appropriate member of the Administrative Team. All evaluations shall be reduced to writing, and placed in the advisors’ personnel files.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to CO-CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES EVALUATION

  • Co-Curricular Activities G. The enrollment of the student of employees who reside outside the District shall be subject to School Board Policy 3.02(3)f, Out-of-County Students.

  • EXTRA-CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES 1. In this agreement, extra-curricular programs and activities include all those that are beyond the provincially prescribed and locally determined curricula of the school.

  • Extracurricular Activities Effective July 1, 2009, stipends for participation in extracurricular activities which are authorized by the appointing authority shall be: Pathfinders/Mountaineering: Inland $950/year Sailing $400/year Art Club Advisor $300/year Drama Club Advisor $300/year Cross Country Skiing $150/year Interscholastic Coaches: Boys’ Basketball $1000/year Girls’ Basketball (if class D) $1000/year Asst. Boys’ Basketball $750/year Asst. Girls’ Basketball (if class D) $750/year Interscholastic Sport: Scorekeeper/Timekeeper $10/game Club Sport Coaches: Soccer $400/year Track $400/year Cross County Running $400/year Girls’ Basketball (if not class D) $400/year Sports Activity Director $400/year Athletic Director $200/year Committee:

  • Activities of Daily Living The basic tasks of everyday life, such as eating, bathing, dressing, toileting, and transferring.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Specific Activities Please give detailed information about the specific activities of the Project promoter and the Partner(s), with budget allocations

  • Self-Evaluation Each regular faculty member shall provide a self-evaluation. It shall address, among other items, the faculty member's fulfillment of professional responsibilities as referenced in Section 18.2.3 and an assessment of his or her own performance. The faculty member will share the self-evaluation with the Faculty Evaluation Committee and the first-level manager or designee. The self-evaluation will become part of the evaluation report.

  • Outreach Activities  Number of outreach events by event type (e.g., meeting with community group, attendance at public event, social media, materials distribution, other)  Number of individuals reached (e.g., number in attendance at community meeting, contacts at public event, followers/likes/friends on social media, amount of materials distributed) Enrollment Activities Enrollment Assistance Contacts - Individuals  # of those assisted from target population  # of those assisted not from target population  # of those assisted by application outcome (complete, incomplete, unknown)  # of applications by enrollment outcome (enrolled, not enrolled, unknown) Enrollment Assistance Contacts – Small Businesses  # of businesses assisted  # of businesses assisted by coverage type (e.g., all carriers and plans, one carrier and all plans, unknown)  Total number of employees represented by small business enrollment assistance contacts  Total number of employees electing coverage Qualitative Reporting  Assessment of organization’s progress toward outreach goals for the period; observations about most/least successful outreach and education activities during the reporting period  Assessment of organization’s progress against enrollment goals  Barriers encountered during reporting report with respect to outreach and/or enrollment activities  Observations about the type of enrollment assistance requested by individuals and/or businesses – e.g., type of assistance requested, at what point in the process individuals/businesses seek assistance, at what point they no longer need assistance  Assessment/observations about length of time spent on each person/entity assisted with enrollment Additionally, the Subrecipient will be expected to attend quarterly Navigator Organization summits to share lessons learned, collaborate on strategies to address shared challenges, and provide feedback to the State. Subrecipient Deliverables

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. Xxxxxxxxx & Xxxxxx will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Focused Evaluation The Focused Evaluation is used when a teacher is not evaluated using the Comprehensive Evaluation process, and will include evaluation of one of the eight state criteria (student growth impact required). If a non-provisional teacher has scored at Proficient or higher the previous year, they may be moved to Focused Evaluation. The teacher may remain on the Focused Evaluation for five (5) years before returning to the Comprehensive Evaluation. The teacher or the evaluator can initiate a move from the Focused to the Comprehensive Evaluation. A decision to move a teacher from a Focused to a Comprehensive Evaluation must occur by December 15.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.