Candidate’s Self-Assessment Sample Clauses

Candidate’s Self-Assessment. The candidate shall complete a self-assessment as part of the evaluation process, utilizing the Candidate’s Self-Assessment form (form C). The candidate may submit additional information concerning professionally related activities such as conference or workshop attendance, professional association memberships, scholarly publications, and research as part of this self- assessment.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Candidate’s Self-Assessment. During the first fall semester, the candidate needs to complete an initial self-assessment (form C1 or C2, as appropriate). This first self- assessment should focus on the plans and goals that the candidate hopes to achieve in the coming semesters. This document should be realistic and reasonable and focus specifically on issues relevant to the candidate’s faculty position with the District. The self-assessment needs to be completed no later than the 12th week of the semester and submitted to the chair of the ITRC.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
Candidate’s Self-Assessment. During the second fall semester, the candidate needs to complete a second self-assessment (form C2). This second self-assessment should focus equally on accomplishments of the past year as well as on the plans and goals that the candidate hopes to achieve in the coming semesters. This document should be realistic and reasonable and focus specifically on issues relevant to the candidate’s faculty position with the District. The self-assessment needs to be completed no later than the 12th week of the semester and submitted to the chair of the ITRC.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
Candidate’s Self-Assessment. During the fourth fall semester, the candidate needs to complete a final tenure review self-assessment (form C2). This self-assessment should focus on the candidate’s accomplishments during the tenure review process and look forward to their continuing contributions to the college in the future should they be granted tenure. This document should be realistic and reasonable and focus specifically on issues relevant to the candidate’s faculty position with the District. The self-assessment needs to be completed no later than the 12th week of the semester and submitted to the chair of the ITRC.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
Candidate’s Self-Assessment. During the third fall semester, the candidate needs to complete a third self-assessment (form C2). This third self-assessment should focus equally on accomplishments of the past year as well as on the plans and goals that the candidate hopes to achieve in the coming semesters. This document should be realistic and reasonable and focus specifically on issues relevant to the candidate’s faculty position with the District. The self-assessment needs to be completed no later than the 12th week of the semester and submitted to the chair of the ITRC.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)

Related to Candidate’s Self-Assessment

  • Self-Assessment (a) Subject to clause 4.4(b), for Services that are Self-Assessable:

  • Formal Investigation Once the matter has been brought to the attention of the Store executive, an internal investigation of the complaint will be conducted at which time the complainant will be requested to present, in writing, the particulars of the harassment. Such internal investigation will be initiated no later than ten (10) business days of the matter being brought to the attention of the Store executive, and shall be concluded no later than thirty (30) business days of the initiation of the investigation. Any extension of the aforementioned time frames must have the agreement of the complainant and the union if the complainant has chosen to involve it. Based on the outcome of the investigation, which will be provided in writing upon the completion of the investigation, to both the complainant and the union, should the complainant consent to this disclosure, it will be determined if there has been a breach of Company policy on harassment, and the appropriate action will be taken in the event that harassment is determined to have occurred. STEP THREE - SUBSEQUENT INCIDENTS Subsequent incidents should immediately be reported and followed by a written description to the most senior store executive involved in Step Two for further investigation and disciplinary action, if confirmed, with a copy to the union Chairperson with the consent of the complainant. After all steps of the Harassment Protection Policy have been exhausted, if the incident has not been resolved to the satisfaction of the employee, the employee may file a grievance at Step 2 of the grievance procedure.

  • Review of assessment The assessment of the applicable percentage should be subject to annual review or earlier on the basis of a reasonable request for such a review. The process of review shall be in accordance with the procedures for assessing capacity under the Supported Wage System.

  • Submitting Investigator An investigator who submitted a genomic dataset to an NIH designated data repository (e.g., dbGaP). Study specific DUC addendum phs000178 : The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Public Posting of Genomic Summary Results - Not Allowed. NIH Data Access Committee (DAC) : NCI DAC Important Contacts : XXXXXX@xxxx.xxx.xxx; XXX@xxxx.xxx.xxx In the event of a data management incident, within 24 hours, please contact emails above.

  • Evaluation Cycle: Annual Orientation A) At the start of each school year, the superintendent, principal or designee shall conduct a meeting for Educators and Evaluators focused substantially on educator evaluation. The superintendent, principal or designee shall:

  • Using Student feedback in Educator Evaluation ESE will provide model contract language, direction and guidance on using student feedback in Educator Evaluation by June 30, 2013. Upon receiving this model contract language, direction and guidance, the parties agree to bargain with respect to this matter.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Evaluation Cycle: Formative Assessment A) A specific purpose for evaluation is to promote student learning, growth and achievement by providing Educators with feedback for improvement. Evaluators are expected to make frequent unannounced visits to classrooms. Evaluators are expected to give targeted constructive feedback to Educators based on their observations of practice, examination of artifacts, and analysis of multiple measures of student learning, growth and achievement in relation to the Standards and Indicators of Effective Teaching Practice.

  • Certification for Federal-Aid Contracts Lobbying Activities A. The CONSULTANT certifies, by signing and submitting this Contract, to the best of its knowledge and belief after diligent inquiry, and other than as disclosed in writing to the LPA prior to or contemporaneously with the execution and delivery of this Contract by the CONSULTANT, the CONSULTANT has complied with Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code, and specifically, that:

  • Geotechnical Investigation Perform in accordance with the City Design Manual and other City requirements as designated in writing by the Director.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.