CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY Sample Clauses

CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY. Purchasers/Tenants are advised that any berm, fencing, or vibration isolation features implements are not to be tamper with or altered, and further to that the owner shall have the sole responsibility for and shall maintain these features. Purchasers/Tenants are advised that the 1.83 metre high chain link security fence to be constructed by the developer and maintained along the common property line of the Railway and the development shall be maintained in a satisfactory conditions by the owners at their expense. Purchasers/Tenants within 300m of the railway right-of-way are advised of the existence of the Railway's operating right-of-way; the possibility of alterations including the possibility that the Railway may expand its operations, which expansion may affect the living environment of the residents notwithstanding the inclusion of noise and vibration attenuation measures in the design of the subdivision and individual units, and that the Railway will not be responsible of complaints or claims arising from the use of its facilities and/or operations.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY. 25. (1) The Owner covenants and agrees to include a clause in all Agreements of Purchase and Sale advising prospective purchasers within 300 m of the Canadian Pacific Railway right-of-way that the Canadian Pacific Railway will not take responsibility for complaints as a result of noise, vibration, air quality, generated by the present and/or future operations.
Sample 1
CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY. (excerpt from Foreign Railways Of The World, 1884) (Gauge 4 feet 8% inches.)
Sample 1

Related to CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY

  • Canadian Pension Plans The Loan Parties shall not (a) contribute to or assume an obligation to contribute to any Canadian Defined Benefit Plan, without the prior written consent of the Administrative Agent, or (b) acquire an interest in any Person if such Person sponsors, administers, maintains or contributes to or has any liability in respect of any Canadian Defined Benefit Plan, or at any time in the five-year period preceding such acquisition has sponsored, administered, maintained, or contributed to a Canadian Defined Benefit Plan, without the prior written consent of the Administrative Agent.

  • Subsidiaries; Equity Interests; Loan Parties (a) Subsidiaries, Joint Ventures, Partnerships and Equity Investments. Set forth on Schedule 5.20(a), is the following information which is true and complete in all respects as of the Closing Date and as of the last date such Schedule was required to be updated in accordance with Sections 6.02 and/or 6.13: (i) a complete and accurate list of all Subsidiaries, joint ventures and partnerships and other equity investments of the Loan Parties as of the Closing Date and as of the last date such Schedule was required to be updated in accordance with Sections 6.02 and/or 6.13, (ii) the number of shares of each class of Equity Interests in each Subsidiary outstanding, (iii) the number and percentage of outstanding shares of each class of Equity Interests owned by the Loan Parties and their Subsidiaries and (iv) the class or nature of such Equity Interests (i.e. voting, non-voting, preferred, etc.). The outstanding Equity Interests in all Subsidiaries are validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable and are owned free and clear of all Liens. There are no outstanding subscriptions, options, warrants, calls, rights or other agreements or commitments (other than stock options granted to employees or directors and directors’ qualifying shares) of any nature relating to the Equity Interests of any Loan Party or any Subsidiary thereof, except as contemplated in connection with the Loan Documents.

  • U.S. Real Property Holding Corporation The Company is not and has never been a U.S. real property holding corporation within the meaning of Section 897 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the Company shall so certify upon Purchaser’s request.

  • Orlando, FL; Ft Lauderdale, FL; Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC; Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC; Nashville, TN; and New Orleans, LA, and BellSouth has provided non- discriminatory cost based access to the Enhanced Extended Link (EEL) throughout Density Zone 1 as determined by NECA Tariff No. 4 as in effect on January 1, 1999.

  • AT&T-21STATE made an offer (the “Offer”) to all Telecommunications carriers to exchange Section 251(b)(5) Traffic, Non-toll VoIP-PSTN Traffic and ISP-Bound Traffic pursuant to the terms and conditions of the FCC’s interim ISP terminating compensation plan of the FCC’s Order on Remand and Report and Order, In the Matter of Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions in the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Intercarrier Compensation for ISP-Bound Traffic, FCC 01-131, CC Docket Nos. 96-98, 99-68 (rel. April 27, 2001)) (“FCC ISP Compensation Order”) which was remanded but not vacated in WorldCom, Inc. v. FCC, No. 01-1218 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.