Award Criteria Figure Formula Sample Clauses

Award Criteria Figure Formula. Line 1. Total Base Bid (Refer to Line 7 of BID FORM), in figures Line 2. Percentage of the Journeyworkers hours that the Contractor proposes to be worked by minority Journey workers during construction of the project. (Maximum figure 0.70) Line 3. Multiply Line 2 by Line 1 by 0.04 Line 4. Percentage of total Apprentice hours that the Contractor proposes to be worked by minority Apprentices during construction of the project. (Maximum figure 0.70) Line 5. Multiply Line 4 by Line 1 by 0.03 Line 6. Percentage of the total Laborer hours that the Contractor proposes to be worked by minority Laborers during construction of the project. (Maximum figure 0.70) Line 7. Multiply Line 6 by Line 1 by 0.01 Line 8. Percentage of total Journeyworker hours that the Contractor proposes to be worked by female Journeyworkers during the construction of the project. (Maximum figure 0.15) Line 9. Multiply Line 8 by Line 1 by 0.04 Line 10. Percentage of total Apprentice hours that the Contractor proposes to be worked by female Apprentices during construction of the project. (Maximum figure 0.15) Line 11. Multiply Line 10 by Line 1 by 0.03 Line 12. Percentage of the total Laborer hours that the Contractor proposes to be worked by female Laborers during construction of the project. (Maximum figure 0.15) Line 13. Multiply Line 12 by Line 1 by 0.01 Line 14. Summation of Lines 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, and 13 Line 15. Subtract Line 14 from Line 1 (= “Award Criteria Figure”) Award Criteria Figure (Insert Line 15 of Award Criteria Formula): $
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Award Criteria Figure Formula

  • Award Criteria 40.1 The Procuring Entity shall award the Contract to the successful tenderer whose tender has been determined to be the Lowest Evaluated Tender in accordance with procedures in Section 3: Evaluation and Qualification Criteria.

  • Selection Criteria for Awarding Task Order The Government will award to the offeror whose proposal is deemed most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment using the evaluation criteria. The Government will evaluate proposals against established selection criteria specified in the task order RFP. Generally, the Government's award decision will be based on selection criteria which addresses past performance, technical acceptability, proposal risk and cost. Among other sources, evaluation of past performance may be based on past performance assessments provided by TO Program Managers on individual task orders performed throughout the life of the contract. The order of importance for the factors will be identified in the RFP for the specified task order.

  • Performance Measurement Satisfactory performance of this Contract will be measured by:

  • Performance Measures and Metrics This section outlines the performance measures and metrics upon which service under this SLA will be assessed. Shared Service Centers and Customers will negotiate the performance metric, frequency, customer and provider service responsibilities associated with each performance measure. Measurements of the Port of Seattle activities are critical to improving services and are the basis for cost recovery for services provided. The Port of Seattle and The Northwest Seaport Alliance have identified activities critical to meeting The NWSA’s business requirements and have agreed upon how these activities will be assessed.

  • Performance Measures The System Agency will monitor the Grantee’s performance of the requirements in Attachment A and compliance with the Contract’s terms and conditions.

  • PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES 4.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) sets out-

  • Performance Metrics In the event Grantee fails to timely achieve the following performance metrics (the “Performance Metrics”), then in accordance with Section 8.4 below Grantee shall upon written demand by Triumph repay to Triumph all portions of Grant theretofore funded to and received by Grantee:

  • Performance Criteria The Performance Criteria are set forth in Exhibit A to this Agreement.

  • Performance Levels (a) The Performance Levels which apply to the performance by the respective Parties of their obligations under this Agreement are set out in Part 1 of Schedule 5. A failure by either Party to achieve the relevant Performance Level will not constitute a breach of this Agreement and the only consequences of such failure as between the Parties shall be the consequences set out in this Clause 5.6.

  • PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS Upon a particular Commission’s issuance of an Order pertaining to Performance Measurements in a proceeding expressly applicable to all CLECs generally, BellSouth shall implement in that state such Performance Measurements as of the date specified by the Commission. Performance Measurements that have been Ordered in a particular state can currently be accessed via the internet at xxxx://xxxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx. The following Service Quality Measurements (SQM) plan as it presently exists and as it may be modified in the future, is being included as the performance measurements currently in place for the state of Tennessee. At such time that the TRA issues a subsequent Order pertaining to Performance Measurements, such Performance Measurements shall supersede the SQM contained in the Agreement. BellSouth Service Quality Measurement Plan‌ (SQM) Tennessee Performance Metrics Measurement Descriptions Version 2.00 Issue Date: July 1, 2003 Introduction

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.