Annual Program Reporting and Review Sample Clauses

Annual Program Reporting and Review. The City and Contractor will conduct an Annual Program Review to assess the overall performance of the STAP, including the following matters relating to the management of STAP: • Review of Advertising Policy • Additions, amendments, or deletions to/from the approved Kit-of-Parts • Review of STAP advertising strategies • Review of advertising occupancy rates • Review of parameters for ad panel sizes • Review of parameters for Digital Displays • Review of STAP sponsorships • Annual review of the Contractor's business and sales plans • Monitoring of the achievement of STAP goals • Review of STAP purchases and Contractor’s adherence to budgeted amounts • Review of the Contractor’s Bond requirements • Review of Contractor capital requests and payment and reimbursement of Contractor expenditures • Review of Contract financial matters such as the Minimum Annual Guarantee, the revenue share, and the developing of new sources of Program revenues. • Review of fees and costs that should be capitalized by the City rather than paid for from Program revenues or the Reinvestment/Reserve Fund. • Review of the environmental impact of the Program and the Contractor’s sustainability practices The Contractor shall prepare an Annual Report to be submitted to the City no later than January 31st of each Contract Year, which will include a report on all the matters referenced above for the previous Contract Year. Included in the Annual Report will be updated Business and Sales Plans based upon the Contractor's assessment of the previous year's activities. The Annual Program Review will take place no later than the second week in February of each Contract Year.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Annual Program Reporting and Review

  • Program Review The Contracting Officer or other authorized government representative may hold semi- annual program review meetings. Such meetings will be held via telecom or video teleconferencing. However, the Government reserves the right to request a meeting in person. The meetings will include all BPA holders, representatives from prospective customer agencies, a combination of current and prospective customer agencies, or individual BPA holders. Some Federal Government Agencies and any approved State, Local and Tribal agencies may establish a central program management function. Such users may require their primary suppliers to participate in agency program review meetings on a periodic basis, at no additional cost to the Government.

  • Program Reporting Contractor shall provide such data as may be required by the Board, in the form required by the Board to fulfill its obligations as a public school district, as well as academic, financial and other program records and reports as requested by the Board for program accreditation, monitoring, payment, and auditing. Such data and reports shall include, but not be limited to, all of the following:

  • Monitoring and Review 5.1 The Council and the BID Company shall set up the Standard Services Review Panel within 28 days from the date of this Agreement the purpose of which shall be to:

  • Reporting and Monitoring Please provide a brief description of the mechanisms proposed for this project for reporting to the UNDP and partners, including a reporting schedule.

  • PERFORMANCE MONITORING AND REPORTING Performance indicators

  • Research Use Reporting To assure adherence to NIH GDS Policy, the PI agrees to provide annual Progress Updates as part of the annual Project Renewal or Project Close-out processes, prior to the expiration of the one (1) year data access period. The PI who is seeking Renewal or Close-out of a project agree to complete the appropriate online forms and provide specific information such as how the data have been used, including publications or presentations that resulted from the use of the requested dataset(s), a summary of any plans for future research use (if the PI is seeking renewal), any violations of the terms of access described within this Agreement and the implemented remediation, and information on any downstream intellectual property generated from the data. The PI also may include general comments regarding suggestions for improving the data access process in general. Information provided in the progress updates helps NIH evaluate program activities and may be considered by the NIH GDS governance committees as part of NIH’s effort to provide ongoing stewardship of data sharing activities subject to the NIH GDS Policy.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • Reporting and Record Keeping CONTRACTOR shall comply with all program and fiscal reporting requirements set forth by appropriate Federal, State and local agencies, and as required by the COUNTY. (c) CONTRACTOR agrees to provide to COUNTY, to any Federal or State department having monitoring or review authority, to COUNTY's authorized representatives, and/or their appropriate audit agencies upon reasonable notice, access to and the right to examine all records and documents necessary to determine compliance with relevant Federal, State, and local statutes, rules and regulations, and this Agreement, and to evaluate the quality, appropriateness and timeliness of services performed.

  • Evaluation, Testing, and Monitoring 1. The System Agency may review, test, evaluate and monitor Grantee’s Products and services, as well as associated documentation and technical support for compliance with the Accessibility Standards. Review, testing, evaluation and monitoring may be conducted before and after the award of a contract. Testing and monitoring may include user acceptance testing. Neither the review, testing (including acceptance testing), evaluation or monitoring of any Product or service, nor the absence of review, testing, evaluation or monitoring, will result in a waiver of the State’s right to contest the Grantee’s assertion of compliance with the Accessibility Standards.

  • Peer Assistance and Review Program 1. MCEA and MCPS agree to jointly operate a Peer Assistance and Review (PAR) Program. The PAR Program is a mechanism for maintaining systemwide quality control and ensuring that all MCPS teachers responsible for teaching students are functioning at or above the high MCPS standards of performance. It provides intensive assistance for any teacher who has not yet achieved that standard or who falls below acceptable standards. Assistance and review are provided to both experienced MCPS teachers in need of significant improvement and teachers in their first year of teaching.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.